P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalLakeside Women's Hospital, A Member of INTEGRIS He Estimated FY2026 net: $0×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 370199

1Hospital

Lakeside Women's Hospital, A Member of INTEGRIS He

2Location

Oklahoma City, OK (Oklahoma’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 73120

Oklahoma County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 23 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

Not Available

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
CMS footnote 16: There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.0427

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $2K, likely $1⁠–⁠2K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.0427 for Lakeside Women's Hospital, A Member of INTEGRIS He and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $2K estimate 1% of about $154K, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.4226 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $1–2K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.0427 This hospital −0.0427 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.0427 This hospital −0.0427

Higher than 50% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 1 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 2 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.7357, to −0.7784. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 2 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 1; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 89% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.654

    Z-score1.3768

    Part of score+0.6884

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 91% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4622

    Part of score−0.7311

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 90no value published0.9623no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTIno value published0.489no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
SSI1.6540.7951.3768+0.6884Worse than 89% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.0000.346−1.4622−0.7311Better than 91% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 2; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.3768SSI−1.4622CDI)÷2measures=−0.0427Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.0427; CMS reports −0.0427. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.4226 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.0427, below CMS’s line.
1% cut SSI: z‑score 1.3768 divided by 2 = +0.6884SSI+0.6884 CDI: z‑score −1.4622 divided by 2 = −0.7311CDI−0.7311 Total HAC Score: −0.0427Score−0.0427 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut SSI: z‑score 1.3768 divided by 2 = +0.6884SSI+0.6884 CDI: z‑score −1.4622 divided by 2 = −0.7311CDI−0.7311 Total HAC Score: −0.0427Score−0.0427 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
SSI1.3768+0.68840.6884
CDI−1.4622−0.7311−0.0427
Total HAC Score−0.0427
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.4226 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.4226 higher, the cut would have been about $2K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $2K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $2K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.0427 This hospital −0.0427 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $2K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $2Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.0427 This hospital −0.0427

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$1,540
This hospital−0.0427$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$1,540

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($154,014payment+$0readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$1,540at stake

$1,540at stake÷7traditional Medicare stays=$220per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $2K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $41,581
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,247
Capital: buildings and equipment $3,202
Uncompensated care $107,984
Total, before the three programs $154,014
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) not in CMS’s readmissions file: no adjustment $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $154,014
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $1,540 $0
Net of the three programs $0

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, outlier payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$41,581
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,247
Capital: buildings and equipment$3,202
Uncompensated care$107,984
Total, before the three programs$154,014
Readmissions (HRRP) (not in CMS’s readmissions file: no adjustment)$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$154,014
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $1,540)$0
Net of the three programs$0

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.0427same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.0427 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $2K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIup to 0.217

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 2 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.654 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0857

CMS 0.000 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.1936

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.0427 among its measured results: +0.6884.
  • SSI +0.6884
  • CDI −0.7311

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 2, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
SSI1.3768+0.6884same
CDI−1.4622−0.7311same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/370199/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 1 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.0000, higher than 55% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.9000, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.3245, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −1.4534, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −1.1546, higher than 2% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.9775, higher than 5% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2249, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 1.1011, higher than 94% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.0844, higher than 58% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.0427, higher than 50% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.0000, higher than 55% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.9000, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.3245, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −1.4534, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −1.1546, higher than 2% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.9775, higher than 5% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2249, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 1.1011, higher than 94% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.0844, higher than 58% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.0427, higher than 50% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.000055.9%not cut
FY20162.25006.2%not cut
FY20172.900014.3%not cut
FY20180.324573.7%not cut
FY2019−1.45343.6%not cut
FY2020−1.15462.9%not cut
FY2021−0.97755.4%not cut
FY2022−0.224935.7%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20241.101194.3%cut
FY20250.084458.5%not cut
FY2026−0.042750.2%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 0 of its 1 infection measures ended lower than they started.
SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 1.17 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.489SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.476SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.502SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 2.198SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 1.171 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 1.17 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.489SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.476SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.502SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 2.198SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 1.171

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearSSI, hysterectomy
20170.000
20180.000
20190.489
20210.476
20221.502
20232.198
20241.171

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Oklahoma, its score is higher than 53% of the other 67 scored there.

In Oklahoma City, OK area, its score is higher than 60% of the other 20 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 7 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 10% (Oklahoma City, OK area) to 28% (Fewer than 100 beds).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma: CMS cut 15 of 68 (22%); middle score −0.1556Oklahoma 68 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma City, OK area: CMS cut 2 of 21 (10%); middle score −0.1382Oklahoma City, OK area 21 hospitals10% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.0427 This hospital −0.0427 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma: CMS cut 15 of 68 (22%); middle score −0.1556Oklahoma68 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma City, OK area: CMS cut 2 of 21 (10%); middle score −0.1382Oklahoma City, OK area21 hospitals10% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.0427 This hospital −0.0427

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045350%
South region1,17426322%−0.105653%
Oklahoma681522%−0.155653%
Oklahoma City, OK area21210%−0.138260%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105353%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115453%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013448%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057451%
This hospital−0.0427
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut none of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi8. Summit Medical Center, LLC, Edmond: score −0.0276, not cut, 6 miles87. Onecore Health, Oklahoma City: score 0.1175, not cut, 5 miles76. INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center, Inc, Oklahoma City: score −0.1382, not cut, 5 miles65. McBride Orthopedic Hospital, Oklahoma City: score −0.1050, not cut, 4 miles54. Oklahoma Spine Hospital, Oklahoma City: score −1.4728, not cut, 2 miles43. Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City, Inc, Oklahoma City: score −0.2467, not cut, 2 miles32. Oklahoma Heart Hospital, LLC, Oklahoma City: score −0.4837, not cut, 2 miles21. Northwest Surgical Hospital, Oklahoma City: score −0.2320, not cut, 2 miles1This hospital: Lakeside Women's Hospital, A Member of INTEGRIS He

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Northwest Surgical Hospital, Oklahoma City, OK2−0.2320not cut
Oklahoma Heart Hospital, LLC, Oklahoma City, OK2−0.4837not cut
Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City, Inc, Oklahoma City, OK2−0.2467not cut
Oklahoma Spine Hospital, Oklahoma City, OK2−1.4728not cut
McBride Orthopedic Hospital, Oklahoma City, OK4−0.1050not cut
INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center, Inc, Oklahoma City, OK5−0.1382not cut
Onecore Health, Oklahoma City, OK50.1175not cut
Summit Medical Center, LLC, Edmond, OK6−0.0276not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Northwest Surgical HospitalOklahoma City, OK2−0.2320No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
2Oklahoma Heart Hospital, LLCOklahoma City, OK2−0.4837No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 5 measures
3Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City, IncOklahoma City, OK2−0.2467No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
4Oklahoma Spine HospitalOklahoma City, OK2−1.4728No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures
5McBride Orthopedic HospitalOklahoma City, OK4−0.1050No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
6INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center, IncOklahoma City, OK5−0.1382No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
7Onecore HealthOklahoma City, OK50.1175No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
8Summit Medical Center, LLCEdmond, OK6−0.0276No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Lakeside Women's Hospital, A Member of INTEGRIS He, Oklahoma City, OK: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/370199/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.