P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSouthwestern Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$131K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 370097

1Hospital

Southwestern Medical Center

2Location

Lawton, OK (Oklahoma’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 73505

Comanche County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 199 beds · For-profit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.6499

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$57K estimate
Likely $43⁠–⁠72K; about $102 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$57K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6499 for Southwestern Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $5.7M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $102 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $43–72K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6499 This hospital 0.6499 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6499 This hospital 0.6499

Higher than 85% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 4 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 3 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.8421, to −0.1922. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 3 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 67% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9201

    Z-score−0.4770

    Part of score−0.1590

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 99% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value3.287

    Z-score2.3863

    Part of score+0.7954

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 56% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.388

    Z-score0.0402

    Part of score+0.0134

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.92010.9623−0.4770−0.1590Better than 67% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTI3.2870.4892.3863+0.7954Worse than 99% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDI0.3880.3460.0402+0.0134Worse than 56% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 3; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.4770PSI 90+2.3863CAUTI+0.0402CDI)÷3measures=0.6499Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make 0.6498; CMS reports 0.6499. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.2707 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.6499, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.4770 divided by 3 = −0.1590PSI 90−0.1590 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 3 = +0.7954CAUTI+0.7954 CDI: z‑score 0.0402 divided by 3 = +0.0134CDI+0.0134 Total HAC Score: 0.6499Score0.6499 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.4770 divided by 3 = −0.1590PSI 90−0.1590 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 3 = +0.7954CAUTI+0.7954 CDI: z‑score 0.0402 divided by 3 = +0.0134CDI+0.0134 Total HAC Score: 0.6499Score0.6499 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.4770−0.1590−0.1590
CAUTI2.3863+0.79540.6364
CDI0.0402+0.01340.6498
Total HAC Score0.6499
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2707 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $57K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $57K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $57K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6499 This hospital 0.6499 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $57K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $57Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6499 This hospital 0.6499

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$56,990
This hospital0.6499−$56,990
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$56,990

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($5,772,783payment−$14,377readmissions−$59,392value-based)×1%the cut=$56,990HAC cut

$56,990HAC cut÷560traditional Medicare stays=$102per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $57K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$14K and −$59K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $4,492,952
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $234,352
Outliers: unusually costly stays $7,638
Capital: buildings and equipment $374,512
Uncompensated care $663,329
Total, before the three programs $5,772,783
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9968 − 1) −$14,377
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9868 − 1) −$59,392
After these two $5,699,014
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $43⁠–⁠72K −$56,990
Net of the three programs likely −$154K to −$105K −$130,759

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$4,492,952
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$234,352
Outliers: unusually costly stays$7,638
Capital: buildings and equipment$374,512
Uncompensated care$663,329
Total, before the three programs$5,772,783
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9968 − 1))−$14,377
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9868 − 1))−$59,392
After these two$5,699,014
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $43–72K)−$56,990
Net of the three programs (likely −$154K to −$105K)−$130,759

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.6499same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$57Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6499 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $57K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.8036 or lower
CAUTI1.200 or lower
CDI0.178 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 3 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9201 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.2327

CMS 3.287 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0804

CMS 0.388 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.1291

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.6499 among its measured results: +0.7954.
  • PSI 90 −0.1590
  • CAUTI +0.7954
  • CDI +0.0134

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 3, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.4770−0.1590same
CAUTI2.3863+0.7954same
CDI0.0402+0.0134same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/370097/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 4 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.3750, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2016: score 4.7500, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.9000, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1512, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.4372, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.9409, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.9516, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −1.0008, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.8823, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.8311, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6499, higher than 85% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.3750, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2016: score 4.7500, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.9000, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1512, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.4372, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.9409, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.9516, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −1.0008, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.8823, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.8311, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6499, higher than 85% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.375082.7%cut
FY20164.750033.4%not cut
FY20173.900024.6%not cut
FY2018−0.151240.1%not cut
FY2019−0.437223.8%not cut
FY2020−0.94097.7%not cut
FY2021−0.95166.3%not cut
FY2022−1.00083.3%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.882390.8%cut
FY20250.831190.9%cut
FY20260.649985.6%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 0 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CAUTI 0.44 → 1.67 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.438CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.607CAUTI, 2022: 1.671 SSI, colon 0.00 → 2.35 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 2.354 MRSA 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.000MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 0.000 C. diff 0.40 → 0.74 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.398C. diff, 2018: 0.367C. diff, 2019: 0.230C. diff, 2021: 0.973C. diff, 2022: 0.604C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.745 CAUTI 0.44 → 1.67 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.438CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.607CAUTI, 2022: 1.671 SSI, colon 0.00 → 2.35 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 2.354 MRSA 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.000MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 0.000 C. diff 0.40 → 0.74 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.398C. diff, 2018: 0.367C. diff, 2019: 0.230C. diff, 2021: 0.973C. diff, 2022: 0.604C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.745

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.4380.0000.398
20180.0000.0000.0000.367
20190.0000.0000.0000.230
20210.6070.0000.973
20221.6712.3540.604
20230.000
20240.745

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Oklahoma, its score is higher than 83% of the other 67 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 25% (Not teaching).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma: CMS cut 15 of 68 (22%); middle score −0.1556Oklahoma 68 hospitals22% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.6499 This hospital 0.6499 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma: CMS cut 15 of 68 (22%); middle score −0.1556Oklahoma68 hospitals22% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.6499 This hospital 0.6499

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045385%
South region1,17426322%−0.105686%
Oklahoma681522%−0.155683%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105384%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073288%
For-profit6519815%−0.259092%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057487%
This hospital0.6499
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 4 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Kell West Regional Hospital, Wichita Falls: score −0.8933, not cut, 53 miles87. Lindsay Municipal Hospital, Lindsay: score 2.1931, cut, 52 miles76. Jackson County Memorial Hospital Authority, Altus: score −0.6129, not cut, 47 miles65. United Regional Health Care System, Wichita Falls: score 0.4055, cut, 46 miles54. Grady Memorial Hospital, Chickasha: score 0.3034, not cut, 44 miles43. Duncan Regional Hospital, Inc, Duncan: score 0.2353, not cut, 36 miles32. Lawton Indian Hospital, Lawton: score 0.0189, not cut, 7 miles21. Memorial Health, Lawton: score 1.0590, cut, 4 miles1This hospital: Southwestern Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Memorial Health, Lawton, OK41.0590cut
Lawton Indian Hospital, Lawton, OK70.0189not cut
Duncan Regional Hospital, Inc, Duncan, OK360.2353not cut
Grady Memorial Hospital, Chickasha, OK440.3034not cut
United Regional Health Care System, Wichita Falls, TX460.4055cut
Jackson County Memorial Hospital Authority, Altus, OK47−0.6129not cut
Lindsay Municipal Hospital, Lindsay, OK522.1931cut
Kell West Regional Hospital, Wichita Falls, TX53−0.8933not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Memorial HealthLawton, OK41.05901% cut$460KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
2Lawton Indian HospitalLawton, OK70.0189No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
3Duncan Regional Hospital, IncDuncan, OK360.2353No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4Grady Memorial HospitalChickasha, OK440.3034No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 3 measures
5United Regional Health Care SystemWichita Falls, TX460.40551% cut$746KAbove the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6Jackson County Memorial Hospital AuthorityAltus, OK47−0.6129No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 4 measures
7Lindsay Municipal HospitalLindsay, OK522.19311% cutno estimateAbove the national median on 1 of 1 measures
8Kell West Regional HospitalWichita Falls, TX53−0.8933No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Southwestern Medical Center, Lawton, OK: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/370097/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.