P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalO U Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$2.5M×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 370093

1Hospital

O U Medical Center

2Location

Oklahoma City, OK (Oklahoma’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 73104

Oklahoma County

3Type

Major teaching · 910 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.8647

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$1.6M estimate
Likely $1.3⁠–⁠1.8M; about $284 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$1.6M

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.8647 for O U Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $163M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $284 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $1.3–1.8M

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.8647 This hospital 0.8647 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.8647 This hospital 0.8647

Higher than 91% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 11 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.4490, to 0.4157. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 6; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.5107

    Z-score2.5111

    Part of score+0.4185

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 76% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.885

    Z-score0.6465

    Part of score+0.1078

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 73% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.737

    Z-score0.4579

    Part of score+0.0763

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 92% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.843

    Z-score1.7006

    Part of score+0.2834

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 51% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.356

    Z-score−0.0837

    Part of score−0.0139

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 53% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.676

    Z-score−0.0445

    Part of score−0.0074

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.51070.96232.5111+0.4185Worse than 97% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.8850.5590.6465+0.1078Worse than 76% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.7370.4890.4579+0.0763Worse than 73% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.8430.7951.7006+0.2834Worse than 92% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.3560.346−0.0837−0.0139Worse than 51% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.6760.641−0.0445−0.0074Worse than 53% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(2.5111PSI 90+0.6465CLABSI+0.4579CAUTI+1.7006SSI−0.0837CDI−0.0445MRSA)÷6measures=0.8647Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.4855 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.8647, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.6465 divided by 6 = +0.1078CLABSI+0.1078 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4579 divided by 6 = +0.0763CAUTI+0.0763 SSI: z‑score 1.7006 divided by 6 = +0.2834SSI+0.2834 CDI: z‑score −0.0837 divided by 6 = −0.0139CDI−0.0139 MRSA: z‑score −0.0445 divided by 6 = −0.0074MRSA−0.0074 Total HAC Score: 0.8647Score0.8647 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.6465 divided by 6 = +0.1078CLABSI+0.1078 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4579 divided by 6 = +0.0763CAUTI+0.0763 SSI: z‑score 1.7006 divided by 6 = +0.2834SSI+0.2834 CDI: z‑score −0.0837 divided by 6 = −0.0139CDI−0.0139 MRSA: z‑score −0.0445 divided by 6 = −0.0074MRSA−0.0074 Total HAC Score: 0.8647Score0.8647 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 902.5111+0.41850.4185
CLABSI0.6465+0.10780.5263
CAUTI0.4579+0.07630.6026
SSI1.7006+0.28340.8860
CDI−0.0837−0.01390.8721
MRSA−0.0445−0.00740.8647
Total HAC Score0.8647
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.4855 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $1.6M by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.6M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.6M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.8647 This hospital 0.8647 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.6M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.6Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.8647 This hospital 0.8647

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$1,626,543
This hospital0.8647−$1,626,543
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$1,626,543

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($150,398,681payment+$13,082,369teaching, MA stays−$31,973readmissions−$794,805value-based)×1%the cut=$1,626,543HAC cut

$1,626,543HAC cut÷5,730traditional Medicare stays=$284per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $1.6M: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$32K and −$795K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $79,933,571
Teaching (indirect medical education) $17,419,124
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $13,082,369
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $6,923,846
Outliers: unusually costly stays $13,125,092
Capital: buildings and equipment $10,760,101
Uncompensated care $22,236,947
Total, before the three programs $163,481,050
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9996 − 1) −$31,973
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9901 − 1) −$794,805
After these two $162,654,272
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $1.3⁠–⁠1.8M −$1,626,543
Net of the three programs likely −$2.7M to −$2.1M −$2,453,321

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$79,933,571
Teaching (indirect medical education)$17,419,124
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$13,082,369
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$6,923,846
Outliers: unusually costly stays$13,125,092
Capital: buildings and equipment$10,760,101
Uncompensated care$22,236,947
Total, before the three programs$163,481,050
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9996 − 1))−$31,973
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9901 − 1))−$794,805
After these two$162,654,272
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $1.3–1.8M)−$1,626,543
Net of the three programs (likely −$2.7M to −$2.1M)−$2,453,321

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.8647same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$1.6Msame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.8647 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $1.6M, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.9308 or lower
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSI0.142 or lower
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.5107 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.885 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.737 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.843 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.356 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.676 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.8647 among its measured results: +0.4185.
  • PSI 90 +0.4185
  • CLABSI +0.1078
  • CAUTI +0.0763
  • SSI +0.2834
  • CDI −0.0139
  • MRSA −0.0074

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 902.5111+0.4185same
CLABSI0.6465+0.1078same
CAUTI0.4579+0.0763same
SSI1.7006+0.2834same
CDI−0.0837−0.0139same
MRSA−0.0445−0.0074same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/370093/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 8 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 11 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.4000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.7500, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.9400, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.6017, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.8007, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.9472, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.8041, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.4313, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2024: score 1.1559, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.1037, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.8647, higher than 91% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.4000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.7500, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.9400, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.6017, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.8007, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.9472, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.8041, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.4313, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2024: score 1.1559, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.1037, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.8647, higher than 91% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.400083.3%cut
FY20167.750086.8%cut
FY20176.940081.6%cut
FY20180.601785.6%cut
FY20190.800791.3%cut
FY20200.947295.0%cut
FY20210.804192.6%cut
FY20220.431380.9%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20241.155995.1%cut
FY20251.103795.5%cut
FY20260.864791.1%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 5 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.38 → 0.54 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.375CLABSI, 2018: 0.733CLABSI, 2019: 0.722CLABSI, 2021: 2.062CLABSI, 2022: 1.477CLABSI, 2023: 1.226CLABSI, 2024: 0.544 CAUTI 0.85 → 0.56 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.847CAUTI, 2018: 0.840CAUTI, 2019: 0.937CAUTI, 2021: 1.319CAUTI, 2022: 1.182CAUTI, 2023: 0.897CAUTI, 2024: 0.563 SSI, colon 1.56 → 1.32 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.558SSI, colon, 2018: 2.038SSI, colon, 2019: 1.176SSI, colon, 2021: 1.154SSI, colon, 2022: 1.689SSI, colon, 2023: 2.071SSI, colon, 2024: 1.321 SSI, hysterectomy 0.72 → 3.44 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.724SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.049SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.292SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.258SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.858SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.378SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 3.439 MRSA 0.96 → 0.72 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.964MRSA, 2018: 1.289MRSA, 2019: 0.529MRSA, 2021: 1.856MRSA, 2022: 1.746MRSA, 2023: 0.633MRSA, 2024: 0.719 C. diff 0.91 → 0.37 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.914C. diff, 2018: 1.004C. diff, 2019: 0.552C. diff, 2021: 0.663C. diff, 2022: 0.473C. diff, 2023: 0.346C. diff, 2024: 0.367 CLABSI 1.38 → 0.54 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.375CLABSI, 2018: 0.733CLABSI, 2019: 0.722CLABSI, 2021: 2.062CLABSI, 2022: 1.477CLABSI, 2023: 1.226CLABSI, 2024: 0.544 CAUTI 0.85 → 0.56 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.847CAUTI, 2018: 0.840CAUTI, 2019: 0.937CAUTI, 2021: 1.319CAUTI, 2022: 1.182CAUTI, 2023: 0.897CAUTI, 2024: 0.563 SSI, colon 1.56 → 1.32 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.558SSI, colon, 2018: 2.038SSI, colon, 2019: 1.176SSI, colon, 2021: 1.154SSI, colon, 2022: 1.689SSI, colon, 2023: 2.071SSI, colon, 2024: 1.321 SSI, hysterectomy 0.72 → 3.44 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.724SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.049SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.292SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.258SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.858SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.378SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 3.439 MRSA 0.96 → 0.72 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.964MRSA, 2018: 1.289MRSA, 2019: 0.529MRSA, 2021: 1.856MRSA, 2022: 1.746MRSA, 2023: 0.633MRSA, 2024: 0.719 C. diff 0.91 → 0.37 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.914C. diff, 2018: 1.004C. diff, 2019: 0.552C. diff, 2021: 0.663C. diff, 2022: 0.473C. diff, 2023: 0.346C. diff, 2024: 0.367

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20171.3750.8471.5580.7240.9640.914
20180.7330.8402.0381.0491.2891.004
20190.7220.9371.1761.2920.5290.552
20212.0621.3191.1541.2581.8560.663
20221.4771.1821.6891.8581.7460.473
20231.2260.8972.0711.3780.6330.346
20240.5440.5631.3213.4390.7190.367

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Oklahoma, its score is higher than 86% of the other 67 scored there.

In Oklahoma City, OK area, its score is higher than 100% of the other 20 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 10% (Oklahoma City, OK area) to 32% (Major teaching).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma: CMS cut 15 of 68 (22%); middle score −0.1556Oklahoma 68 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma City, OK area: CMS cut 2 of 21 (10%); middle score −0.1382Oklahoma City, OK area 21 hospitals10% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up 365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.8647 This hospital 0.8647 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma: CMS cut 15 of 68 (22%); middle score −0.1556Oklahoma68 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma City, OK area: CMS cut 2 of 21 (10%); middle score −0.1382Oklahoma City, OK area21 hospitals10% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.8647 This hospital 0.8647

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045391%
South region1,17426322%−0.105691%
Oklahoma681522%−0.155686%
Oklahoma City, OK area21210%−0.1382100%
Major teaching42413632%0.178092%
500 beds and up36510529%0.132393%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013491%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057493%
This hospital0.8647
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is about a mile away.
5 mi8. Northwest Surgical Hospital, Oklahoma City: score −0.2320, not cut, 7 miles87. SSM Health St Anthony Hospital - Midwest, Midwest City: score 0.1894, not cut, 6 miles76. McBride Orthopedic Hospital, Oklahoma City: score −0.1050, not cut, 6 miles65. Surgical Hospital of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City: score −0.2534, not cut, 5 miles54. Onecore Health, Oklahoma City: score 0.1175, not cut, 5 miles43. INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center, Inc, Oklahoma City: score −0.1382, not cut, 5 miles32. INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center, Oklahoma City: score −0.2345, not cut, 5 miles21. SSM Health St Anthony Hospital - Oklahoma City, Oklahoma City: score 0.7818, cut, about a mile1This hospital: O U Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
SSM Health St Anthony Hospital - Oklahoma City, Oklahoma City, OK10.7818cut
INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK5−0.2345not cut
INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center, Inc, Oklahoma City, OK5−0.1382not cut
Onecore Health, Oklahoma City, OK50.1175not cut
Surgical Hospital of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK5−0.2534not cut
McBride Orthopedic Hospital, Oklahoma City, OK6−0.1050not cut
SSM Health St Anthony Hospital - Midwest, Midwest City, OK60.1894not cut
Northwest Surgical Hospital, Oklahoma City, OK7−0.2320not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1SSM Health St Anthony Hospital - Oklahoma CityOklahoma City, OK10.78181% cut$904KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
2INTEGRIS Southwest Medical CenterOklahoma City, OK5−0.2345No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
3INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center, IncOklahoma City, OK5−0.1382No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
4Onecore HealthOklahoma City, OK50.1175No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
5Surgical Hospital of OklahomaOklahoma City, OK5−0.2534No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
6McBride Orthopedic HospitalOklahoma City, OK6−0.1050No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
7SSM Health St Anthony Hospital - MidwestMidwest City, OK60.1894No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Northwest Surgical HospitalOklahoma City, OK7−0.2320No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. O U Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/370093/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.