P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalAscension St John Jane Phillips Estimated FY2026 net: −$44K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 370018

1Hospital

Ascension St John Jane Phillips

2Location

Bartlesville, OK (Oklahoma’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 74006

Washington County

3Type

Minor teaching · 133 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Rural referral center · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.4304

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $206K, likely $148⁠–⁠232K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.4304 for Ascension St John Jane Phillips and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $206K estimate 1% of about $20.6M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.8103 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $148–232K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.4304 This hospital −0.4304 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.4304 This hospital −0.4304

Higher than 24% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing MRSA down to the national median (0.641) would lower the score the most: by 0.0745, to −0.5049. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 72% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9009

    Z-score−0.6112

    Part of score−0.1019

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4065

    Part of score−0.2344

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.3186

    Part of score−0.2198

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 58% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value0.914

    Z-score0.1092

    Part of score+0.0182

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 66% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.459

    Z-score0.3151

    Part of score+0.0525

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 67% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value0.855

    Z-score0.3296

    Part of score+0.0549

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.90090.9623−0.6112−0.1019Better than 72% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.0000.559−1.4065−0.2344Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.0000.489−1.3186−0.2198Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.9140.7950.1092+0.0182Worse than 58% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.4590.3460.3151+0.0525Worse than 66% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.8550.6410.3296+0.0549Worse than 67% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.6112PSI 90−1.4065CLABSI−1.3186CAUTI+0.1092SSI+0.3151CDI+0.3296MRSA)÷6measures=−0.4304Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.4304; CMS reports −0.4304. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.8103 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.4304, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.6112 divided by 6 = −0.1019PSI 90−0.1019 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 6 = −0.2344CLABSI−0.2344 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score 0.1092 divided by 6 = +0.0182SSI+0.0182 CDI: z‑score 0.3151 divided by 6 = +0.0525CDI+0.0525 MRSA: z‑score 0.3296 divided by 6 = +0.0549MRSA+0.0549 Total HAC Score: −0.4304Score−0.4304 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.6112 divided by 6 = −0.1019PSI 90−0.1019 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 6 = −0.2344CLABSI−0.2344 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score 0.1092 divided by 6 = +0.0182SSI+0.0182 CDI: z‑score 0.3151 divided by 6 = +0.0525CDI+0.0525 MRSA: z‑score 0.3296 divided by 6 = +0.0549MRSA+0.0549 Total HAC Score: −0.4304Score−0.4304 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.6112−0.1019−0.1019
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2344−0.3363
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198−0.5561
SSI0.1092+0.0182−0.5379
CDI0.3151+0.0525−0.4854
MRSA0.3296+0.0549−0.4305
Total HAC Score−0.4304
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.8103 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.8103 higher, the cut would have been about $206K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $206K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $206K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.4304 This hospital −0.4304 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $206K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $206Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.4304 This hospital −0.4304

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$206,423
This hospital−0.4304$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$206,423

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($20,679,270payment+$7,140teaching, MA stays−$44,152readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$206,423at stake

$206,423at stake÷1,675traditional Medicare stays=$123per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $206K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$44K and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $16,981,690
Teaching (indirect medical education) $20,378
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $7,140
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $427,259
Outliers: unusually costly stays $107,494
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,314,438
Uncompensated care $1,828,011
Total, before the three programs $20,686,410
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9974 − 1) −$44,152
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $20,642,258
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $206,423 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$47K to −$31K −$44,152

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$16,981,690
Teaching (indirect medical education)$20,378
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$7,140
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$427,259
Outliers: unusually costly stays$107,494
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,314,438
Uncompensated care$1,828,011
Total, before the three programs$20,686,410
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9974 − 1))−$44,152
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$20,642,258
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $206,423)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$47K to −$31K)−$44,152

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.4304same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.4304 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $206K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9009 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.000 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.000 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.914 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.459 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.855 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.4304 among its measured results: +0.0549.
  • PSI 90 −0.1019
  • CLABSI −0.2344
  • CAUTI −0.2198
  • SSI +0.0182
  • CDI +0.0525
  • MRSA +0.0549

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.6112−0.1019same
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2344same
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198same
SSI0.1092+0.0182same
CDI0.3151+0.0525same
MRSA0.3296+0.0549same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/370018/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.9750, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.5000, higher than 48% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.4900, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.4911, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2019: score −0.1506, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.6467, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.8396, higher than 8% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.5828, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5839, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.5902, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.4304, higher than 24% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.9750, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.5000, higher than 48% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.4900, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.4911, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2019: score −0.1506, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.6467, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.8396, higher than 8% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.5828, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5839, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.5902, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.4304, higher than 24% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20151.97504.3%not cut
FY20165.500048.7%not cut
FY20177.490089.6%cut
FY20180.491181.5%cut
FY2019−0.150640.8%not cut
FY2020−0.646714.4%not cut
FY2021−0.83968.4%not cut
FY2022−0.582816.5%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.583915.3%not cut
FY2025−0.590216.3%not cut
FY2026−0.430424.5%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.696CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 1.622CLABSI, 2022: 0.000 CAUTI 0.78 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.775CAUTI, 2018: 0.952CAUTI, 2019: 0.516CAUTI, 2021: 1.939CAUTI, 2022: 0.414CAUTI, 2023: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.72 → 0.57 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.719SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.570 C. diff 0.56 → 0.62 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.561C. diff, 2018: 0.503C. diff, 2019: 0.740C. diff, 2021: 0.769C. diff, 2022: 0.212C. diff, 2023: 0.423C. diff, 2024: 0.616 CLABSI 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.696CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 1.622CLABSI, 2022: 0.000 CAUTI 0.78 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.775CAUTI, 2018: 0.952CAUTI, 2019: 0.516CAUTI, 2021: 1.939CAUTI, 2022: 0.414CAUTI, 2023: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.72 → 0.57 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.719SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.570 C. diff 0.56 → 0.62 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.561C. diff, 2018: 0.503C. diff, 2019: 0.740C. diff, 2021: 0.769C. diff, 2022: 0.212C. diff, 2023: 0.423C. diff, 2024: 0.616

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonC. diff
20170.0000.7750.7190.561
20180.6960.9520.0000.503
20190.0000.5160.740
20211.6221.9390.769
20220.0000.4140.0000.212
20230.0000.5700.423
20240.616

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Oklahoma, its score is higher than 28% of the other 67 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma: CMS cut 15 of 68 (22%); middle score −0.1556Oklahoma 68 hospitals22% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.4304 This hospital −0.4304 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma: CMS cut 15 of 68 (22%); middle score −0.1556Oklahoma68 hospitals22% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.4304 This hospital −0.4304

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045324%
South region1,17426322%−0.105627%
Oklahoma681522%−0.155628%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056720%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073225%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013421%
Rural61919632%0.022927%
This hospital−0.4304
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 31 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Hillcrest Hospital Pryor, Pryor: score 0.4226, cut, 46 miles87. Saint Francis Hospital Vinita, Inc, Vinita: score 0.3074, not cut, 44 miles76. Ascension St John Medical Center, Tulsa: score 0.4282, cut, 43 miles65. Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa: score 0.0398, not cut, 42 miles54. Hillcrest Hospital Claremore, Claremore: score −0.8371, not cut, 35 miles43. Claremore Indian Hospital, Claremore: score −1.4622, not cut, 34 miles32. St John Owasso, Owasso: score 0.8727, cut, 32 miles21. Bailey Medical Center, LLC, Owasso: score −1.0668, not cut, 31 miles1This hospital: Ascension St John Jane Phillips

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Bailey Medical Center, LLC, Owasso, OK31−1.0668not cut
St John Owasso, Owasso, OK320.8727cut
Claremore Indian Hospital, Claremore, OK34−1.4622not cut
Hillcrest Hospital Claremore, Claremore, OK35−0.8371not cut
Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK420.0398not cut
Ascension St John Medical Center, Tulsa, OK430.4282cut
Saint Francis Hospital Vinita, Inc, Vinita, OK440.3074not cut
Hillcrest Hospital Pryor, Pryor, OK460.4226cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Bailey Medical Center, LLCOwasso, OK31−1.0668No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 3 measures
2St John OwassoOwasso, OK320.87271% cut$36KAbove the national median on 1 of 1 measures
3Claremore Indian HospitalClaremore, OK34−1.4622No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
4Hillcrest Hospital ClaremoreClaremore, OK35−0.8371No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 3 measures
5Oklahoma State University Medical CenterTulsa, OK420.0398No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
6Ascension St John Medical CenterTulsa, OK430.42821% cut$1.1MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7Saint Francis Hospital Vinita, IncVinita, OK440.3074No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
8Hillcrest Hospital PryorPryor, OK460.42261% cut$18KAbove the national median on 2 of 2 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

29
This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Ascension St John Jane Phillips, Bartlesville, OK: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/370018/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.