P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalAlliancehealth Durant Estimated FY2026 net: −$457K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 370014

1Hospital

Alliancehealth Durant

2Location

Durant, OK (Oklahoma’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 74702

Bryan County

3Type

Minor teaching · 120 beds · For-profit · Rural · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

1 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.3019

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $221K, likely $168⁠–⁠278K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.3019 for Alliancehealth Durant and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $221K estimate 1% of about $22.1M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.6818 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $168–278K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.3019 This hospital −0.3019 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.3019 This hospital −0.3019

Higher than 32% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing MRSA down to the national median (0.641) would lower the score the most: by 0.2982, to −0.6001. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 1; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 87% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8378

    Z-score−1.0518

    Part of score−0.1753

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 55% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.499

    Z-score−0.2489

    Part of score−0.0415

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 80% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.183

    Z-score−0.8775

    Part of score−0.1463

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 83% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.271

    Z-score−0.9923

    Part of score−0.1654

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 57% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.297

    Z-score−0.3122

    Part of score−0.0520

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 91% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.497

    Z-score1.6713

    Part of score+0.2786

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.83780.9623−1.0518−0.1753Better than 87% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.4990.559−0.2489−0.0415Better than 55% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.1830.489−0.8775−0.1463Better than 80% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.2710.795−0.9923−0.1654Better than 83% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.2970.346−0.3122−0.0520Better than 57% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.4970.6411.6713+0.2786Worse than 91% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−1.0518PSI 90−0.2489CLABSI−0.8775CAUTI−0.9923SSI−0.3122CDI+1.6713MRSA)÷6measures=−0.3019Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.3019; CMS reports −0.3019. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.6818 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.3019, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.0518 divided by 6 = −0.1753PSI 90−0.1753 CLABSI: z‑score −0.2489 divided by 6 = −0.0415CLABSI−0.0415 CAUTI: z‑score −0.8775 divided by 6 = −0.1463CAUTI−0.1463 SSI: z‑score −0.9923 divided by 6 = −0.1654SSI−0.1654 CDI: z‑score −0.3122 divided by 6 = −0.0520CDI−0.0520 MRSA: z‑score 1.6713 divided by 6 = +0.2786MRSA+0.2786 Total HAC Score: −0.3019Score−0.3019 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.0518 divided by 6 = −0.1753PSI 90−0.1753 CLABSI: z‑score −0.2489 divided by 6 = −0.0415CLABSI−0.0415 CAUTI: z‑score −0.8775 divided by 6 = −0.1463CAUTI−0.1463 SSI: z‑score −0.9923 divided by 6 = −0.1654SSI−0.1654 CDI: z‑score −0.3122 divided by 6 = −0.0520CDI−0.0520 MRSA: z‑score 1.6713 divided by 6 = +0.2786MRSA+0.2786 Total HAC Score: −0.3019Score−0.3019 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−1.0518−0.1753−0.1753
CLABSI−0.2489−0.0415−0.2168
CAUTI−0.8775−0.1463−0.3631
SSI−0.9923−0.1654−0.5285
CDI−0.3122−0.0520−0.5805
MRSA1.6713+0.2786−0.3019
Total HAC Score−0.3019
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.6818 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.6818 higher, the cut would have been about $221K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $221K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $221K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.3019 This hospital −0.3019 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $221K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $221Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.3019 This hospital −0.3019

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$220,901
This hospital−0.3019$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$220,901

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($22,040,456payment+$507,111teaching, MA stays−$487,085readmissions+$29,646value-based)×1%the cut=$220,901at stake

$220,901at stake÷2,003traditional Medicare stays=$110per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $221K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$487K and +$30K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $17,211,485
Teaching (indirect medical education) $863,672
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $507,111
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,125,287
Outliers: unusually costly stays $53,700
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,397,949
Uncompensated care $1,388,363
Total, before the three programs $22,547,567
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9717 − 1) −$487,085
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0017 − 1) +$29,646
After these two $22,090,128
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $220,901 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$538K to −$368K −$457,439

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$17,211,485
Teaching (indirect medical education)$863,672
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$507,111
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,125,287
Outliers: unusually costly stays$53,700
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,397,949
Uncompensated care$1,388,363
Total, before the three programs$22,547,567
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9717 − 1))−$487,085
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0017 − 1))+$29,646
After these two$22,090,128
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $220,901)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$538K to −$368K)−$457,439

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.3019same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.3019 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $221K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8378 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.499 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.183 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.271 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.297 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.497 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.3019 among its measured results: +0.2786.
  • PSI 90 −0.1753
  • CLABSI −0.0415
  • CAUTI −0.1463
  • SSI −0.1654
  • CDI −0.0520
  • MRSA +0.2786

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−1.0518−0.1753same
CLABSI−0.2489−0.0415same
CAUTI−0.8775−0.1463same
SSI−0.9923−0.1654same
CDI−0.3122−0.0520same
MRSA1.6713+0.2786same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/370014/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.6250, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.5000, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.5900, higher than 54% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.0570, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.4587, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.7094, higher than 13% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.7048, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.3974, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.2274, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.0077, higher than 51% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.3019, higher than 32% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.6250, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.5000, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.5900, higher than 54% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.0570, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.4587, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.7094, higher than 13% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.7048, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.3974, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.2274, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.0077, higher than 51% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.3019, higher than 32% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20152.62509.6%not cut
FY20164.500030.4%not cut
FY20175.590054.0%not cut
FY20180.057057.3%not cut
FY2019−0.458723.1%not cut
FY2020−0.709413.0%not cut
FY2021−0.704812.3%not cut
FY2022−0.397425.0%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.227436.2%not cut
FY2025−0.007751.4%not cut
FY2026−0.301932.2%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 0.98 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.785CLABSI, 2021: 0.448CLABSI, 2022: 0.617CLABSI, 2023: 0.976 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.656CAUTI, 2022: 0.503CAUTI, 2023: 0.307CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 0.95 → 1.97 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2019: 0.948MRSA, 2021: 0.923MRSA, 2023: 1.965 C. diff 0.81 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.814C. diff, 2018: 0.291C. diff, 2019: 0.466C. diff, 2021: 0.372C. diff, 2022: 1.072C. diff, 2023: 0.579C. diff, 2024: 0.000 CLABSI 0.00 → 0.98 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.785CLABSI, 2021: 0.448CLABSI, 2022: 0.617CLABSI, 2023: 0.976 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.656CAUTI, 2022: 0.503CAUTI, 2023: 0.307CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 0.95 → 1.97 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2019: 0.948MRSA, 2021: 0.923MRSA, 2023: 1.965 C. diff 0.81 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.814C. diff, 2018: 0.291C. diff, 2019: 0.466C. diff, 2021: 0.372C. diff, 2022: 1.072C. diff, 2023: 0.579C. diff, 2024: 0.000

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20170.0000.0000.814
20180.0000.291
20190.7850.0000.9480.466
20210.4480.6560.9230.372
20220.6170.5031.072
20230.9760.3070.0001.9650.579
20240.0000.0000.000

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Oklahoma, its score is higher than 35% of the other 67 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma: CMS cut 15 of 68 (22%); middle score −0.1556Oklahoma 68 hospitals22% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.3019 This hospital −0.3019 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Oklahoma: CMS cut 15 of 68 (22%); middle score −0.1556Oklahoma68 hospitals22% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.3019 This hospital −0.3019

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045332%
South region1,17426322%−0.105635%
Oklahoma681522%−0.155635%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056729%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073233%
For-profit6519815%−0.259046%
Rural61919632%0.022932%
This hospital−0.3019
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 24 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Hunt Regional Medical Center, Greenville: score 1.0623, cut, 58 miles87. Baylor Scott and White Medical Center McKinney, McKinney: score −0.2622, not cut, 57 miles76. North Texas Medical Center, Gainesville: score −0.1894, not cut, 57 miles65. Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc, Ardmore: score −0.6045, not cut, 53 miles54. Paris Regional Medical Center, Paris: score −0.1944, not cut, 45 miles43. Wilson N Jones Regional Medical Center, Sherman: score −0.2471, not cut, 31 miles32. Baylor Scott and White Surgical Hospital at Sherma, Sherman: score −0.7775, not cut, 28 miles21. Texoma Medical Center, Denison: score −0.2964, not cut, 24 miles1This hospital: Alliancehealth Durant

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Texoma Medical Center, Denison, TX24−0.2964not cut
Baylor Scott and White Surgical Hospital at Sherma, Sherman, TX28−0.7775not cut
Wilson N Jones Regional Medical Center, Sherman, TX31−0.2471not cut
Paris Regional Medical Center, Paris, TX45−0.1944not cut
Mercy Hospital Ardmore, Inc, Ardmore, OK53−0.6045not cut
North Texas Medical Center, Gainesville, TX57−0.1894not cut
Baylor Scott and White Medical Center McKinney, McKinney, TX57−0.2622not cut
Hunt Regional Medical Center, Greenville, TX581.0623cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Texoma Medical CenterDenison, TX24−0.2964No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2Baylor Scott and White Surgical Hospital at ShermaSherman, TX28−0.7775No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures
3Wilson N Jones Regional Medical CenterSherman, TX31−0.2471No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 3 measures
4Paris Regional Medical CenterParis, TX45−0.1944No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5Mercy Hospital Ardmore, IncArdmore, OK53−0.6045No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
6North Texas Medical CenterGainesville, TX57−0.1894No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 4 measures
7Baylor Scott and White Medical Center McKinneyMcKinney, TX57−0.2622No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8Hunt Regional Medical CenterGreenville, TX581.06231% cut$260KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Alliancehealth Durant, Durant, OK: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/370014/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.