P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSalem Regional Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$98K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 360185

1Hospital

Salem Regional Medical Center

2Location

Salem, OH (Ohio’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 44460

Columbiana County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 252 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Medicare-dependent hospital

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.6397

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

Likely $48⁠–⁠75K; about $123 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$67K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6397 for Salem Regional Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $6.7M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $123 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $48–75K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6397 This hospital 0.6397 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6397 This hospital 0.6397

Higher than 85% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CDI down to the national median (0.346) would lower the score the most: by 0.2362, to 0.4035. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 5 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CDI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 80% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0948

    Z-score0.7423

    Part of score+0.1485

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 84% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.034

    Z-score0.9922

    Part of score+0.1984

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 54% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.449

    Z-score−0.2363

    Part of score−0.0473

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 75% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.225

    Z-score0.6420

    Part of score+0.1284

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 84% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.651

    Z-score1.0585

    Part of score+0.2117

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.09480.96230.7423+0.1485Worse than 80% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.0340.5590.9922+0.1984Worse than 84% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.4490.489−0.2363−0.0473Better than 54% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.2250.7950.6420+0.1284Worse than 75% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.6510.3461.0585+0.2117Worse than 84% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.7423PSI 90+0.9922CLABSI−0.2363CAUTI+0.6420SSI+1.0585CDI)÷5measures=0.6397Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2605 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.6397, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.7423 divided by 5 = +0.1485PSI 90+0.1485 CLABSI: z‑score 0.9922 divided by 5 = +0.1984CLABSI+0.1984 CAUTI: z‑score −0.2363 divided by 5 = −0.0473CAUTI−0.0473 SSI: z‑score 0.6420 divided by 5 = +0.1284SSI+0.1284 CDI: z‑score 1.0585 divided by 5 = +0.2117CDI+0.2117 Total HAC Score: 0.6397Score0.6397 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.7423 divided by 5 = +0.1485PSI 90+0.1485 CLABSI: z‑score 0.9922 divided by 5 = +0.1984CLABSI+0.1984 CAUTI: z‑score −0.2363 divided by 5 = −0.0473CAUTI−0.0473 SSI: z‑score 0.6420 divided by 5 = +0.1284SSI+0.1284 CDI: z‑score 1.0585 divided by 5 = +0.2117CDI+0.2117 Total HAC Score: 0.6397Score0.6397 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.7423+0.14850.1485
CLABSI0.9922+0.19840.3469
CAUTI−0.2363−0.04730.2996
SSI0.6420+0.12840.4280
CDI1.0585+0.21170.6397
Total HAC Score0.6397
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2605 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $67K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $67K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $67K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6397 This hospital 0.6397 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $67K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $67Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6397 This hospital 0.6397

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$66,687
This hospital0.6397−$66,687
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$66,687

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($6,700,462payment+$0readmissions−$31,736value-based)×1%the cut=$66,687HAC cut

$66,687HAC cut÷542traditional Medicare stays=$123per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $67K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and −$32K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates $5,001,603
Medicare-dependent hospital add-on $1,307,920
Base payment the base $6,309,523
Outliers: unusually costly stays $4,952
Capital: buildings and equipment $385,987
Total, before the three programs $6,700,462
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9950 − 1) −$31,736
After these two $6,668,726
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $48⁠–⁠75K −$66,687
Net of the three programs likely −$104K to −$68K −$98,423

Not paid to this hospital: teaching payments, low-income-patient payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates$5,001,603
Medicare-dependent hospital add-on$1,307,920
Base payment (the base)$6,309,523
Outliers: unusually costly stays$4,952
Capital: buildings and equipment$385,987
Total, before the three programs$6,700,462
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9950 − 1))−$31,736
After these two$6,668,726
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $48–75K)−$66,687
Net of the three programs (likely −$104K to −$68K)−$98,423

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.6397same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$67Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6397 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $67K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.9081 or lower
CLABSI0.472 or lower
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSI0.464 or lower
CDI0.314 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0948 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 1.034 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0464

CMS 0.449 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

CMS 1.225 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0343

CMS 0.651 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CDI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.6397 among its measured results: +0.2117.
  • PSI 90 +0.1485
  • CLABSI +0.1984
  • CAUTI −0.0473
  • SSI +0.1284
  • CDI +0.2117

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.7423+0.1485same
CLABSI0.9922+0.1984same
CAUTI−0.2363−0.0473same
SSI0.6420+0.1284same
CDI1.0585+0.2117same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.9500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.6200, higher than 54% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1688, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.4595, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.0586, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.0326, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.0630, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.0610, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.8247, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6397, higher than 85% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.9500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.6200, higher than 54% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1688, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.4595, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.0586, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.0326, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.0630, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.0610, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.8247, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6397, higher than 85% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.950072.7%not cut
FY20166.000056.2%not cut
FY20175.620054.7%not cut
FY2018−0.168839.0%not cut
FY2019−0.459523.0%not cut
FY2020−0.058647.5%not cut
FY2021−0.032649.8%not cut
FY2022−0.063047.7%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.061057.7%not cut
FY20250.824790.8%cut
FY20260.639785.2%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.73 → 1.87 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.726CLABSI, 2018: 0.928CLABSI, 2019: 0.972CLABSI, 2021: 1.351CLABSI, 2022: 0.907CLABSI, 2023: 1.866 CAUTI 0.64 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.637CAUTI, 2018: 0.407CAUTI, 2019: 1.216CAUTI, 2021: 2.074CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.833CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.94 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.941 C. diff 0.89 → 0.54 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.888C. diff, 2018: 0.858C. diff, 2019: 0.233C. diff, 2021: 0.583C. diff, 2022: 0.467C. diff, 2023: 0.813C. diff, 2024: 0.543 CLABSI 0.73 → 1.87 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.726CLABSI, 2018: 0.928CLABSI, 2019: 0.972CLABSI, 2021: 1.351CLABSI, 2022: 0.907CLABSI, 2023: 1.866 CAUTI 0.64 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.637CAUTI, 2018: 0.407CAUTI, 2019: 1.216CAUTI, 2021: 2.074CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.833CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.94 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.941 C. diff 0.89 → 0.54 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.888C. diff, 2018: 0.858C. diff, 2019: 0.233C. diff, 2021: 0.583C. diff, 2022: 0.467C. diff, 2023: 0.813C. diff, 2024: 0.543

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonC. diff
20170.7260.6370.888
20180.9280.4070.0000.858
20190.9721.2160.0000.233
20211.3512.0740.583
20220.9070.0000.467
20231.8660.8330.813
20240.0000.9410.543

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Ohio, its score is higher than 88% of the other 113 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (100 to 299 beds) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Ohio: CMS cut 31 of 114 (27%); middle score 0.1059Ohio 114 hospitals27% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.6397 This hospital 0.6397 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Ohio: CMS cut 31 of 114 (27%); middle score 0.1059Ohio114 hospitals27% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.6397 This hospital 0.6397

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045385%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026885%
Ohio1143127%0.105988%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105384%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073287%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013484%
Rural61919632%0.022978%
This hospital0.6397
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 12 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. University Hospitals Portage Medical Center, Ravenna: score 0.5254, cut, 27 miles87. East Liverpool City Hospital, East Liverpool: score −0.5197, not cut, 24 miles76. Insight Hospital and Medical Center Trumbull, Warren: score −0.0796, not cut, 23 miles65. MH St Joseph Warren Hospital, Warren: score 0.0995, not cut, 23 miles54. MH St Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital, Youngstown: score 0.1123, not cut, 18 miles43. Surgical Hospital at Southwoods, Youngstown: score −0.2864, not cut, 14 miles32. HMHP St Elizabeth Boardman Health Center, Boardman: score 0.3993, cut, 13 miles21. Alliance Community Hospital, Alliance: score −0.6647, not cut, 12 miles1This hospital: Salem Regional Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Alliance Community Hospital, Alliance, OH12−0.6647not cut
HMHP St Elizabeth Boardman Health Center, Boardman, OH130.3993cut
Surgical Hospital at Southwoods, Youngstown, OH14−0.2864not cut
MH St Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital, Youngstown, OH180.1123not cut
MH St Joseph Warren Hospital, Warren, OH230.0995not cut
Insight Hospital and Medical Center Trumbull, Warren, OH23−0.0796not cut
East Liverpool City Hospital, East Liverpool, OH24−0.5197not cut
University Hospitals Portage Medical Center, Ravenna, OH270.5254cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Alliance Community HospitalAlliance, OH12−0.6647No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 3 measures
2HMHP St Elizabeth Boardman Health CenterBoardman, OH130.39931% cut$342KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3Surgical Hospital at SouthwoodsYoungstown, OH14−0.2864No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures
4MH St Elizabeth Youngstown HospitalYoungstown, OH180.1123No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5MH St Joseph Warren HospitalWarren, OH230.0995No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6Insight Hospital and Medical Center TrumbullWarren, OH23−0.0796No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
7East Liverpool City HospitalEast Liverpool, OH24−0.5197No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures
8University Hospitals Portage Medical CenterRavenna, OH270.52541% cut$138KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Salem Regional Medical Center, Salem, OH: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/360185/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.