P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSpringfield Regional Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$61K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 360086

1Hospital

Springfield Regional Medical Center

2Location

Springfield, OH (Ohio’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 45504

Clark County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 254 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

4 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.2385

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $309K, likely $235⁠–⁠388K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2385 for Springfield Regional Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $309K estimate 1% of about $30.9M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.1414 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $235–388K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2385 This hospital 0.2385 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2385 This hospital 0.2385

Higher than 67% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.2958, to −0.0573. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 81% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8695

    Z-score−0.8303

    Part of score−0.1384

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 91% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.324

    Z-score1.6649

    Part of score+0.2775

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 53% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.530

    Z-score−0.0410

    Part of score−0.0068

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 89% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.676

    Z-score1.4145

    Part of score+0.2358

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 84% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.115

    Z-score−1.0169

    Part of score−0.1695

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 64% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.812

    Z-score0.2397

    Part of score+0.0400

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.86950.9623−0.8303−0.1384Better than 81% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.3240.5591.6649+0.2775Worse than 91% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.5300.489−0.0410−0.0068Worse than 53% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.6760.7951.4145+0.2358Worse than 89% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.1150.346−1.0169−0.1695Better than 84% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.8120.6410.2397+0.0400Worse than 64% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.8303PSI 90+1.6649CLABSI−0.0410CAUTI+1.4145SSI−1.0169CDI+0.2397MRSA)÷6measures=0.2385Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.1414 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.2385, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.8303 divided by 6 = −0.1384PSI 90−0.1384 CLABSI: z‑score 1.6649 divided by 6 = +0.2775CLABSI+0.2775 CAUTI: z‑score −0.0410 divided by 6 = −0.0068CAUTI−0.0068 SSI: z‑score 1.4145 divided by 6 = +0.2358SSI+0.2358 CDI: z‑score −1.0169 divided by 6 = −0.1695CDI−0.1695 MRSA: z‑score 0.2397 divided by 6 = +0.0400MRSA+0.0400 Total HAC Score: 0.2385Score0.2385 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.8303 divided by 6 = −0.1384PSI 90−0.1384 CLABSI: z‑score 1.6649 divided by 6 = +0.2775CLABSI+0.2775 CAUTI: z‑score −0.0410 divided by 6 = −0.0068CAUTI−0.0068 SSI: z‑score 1.4145 divided by 6 = +0.2358SSI+0.2358 CDI: z‑score −1.0169 divided by 6 = −0.1695CDI−0.1695 MRSA: z‑score 0.2397 divided by 6 = +0.0400MRSA+0.0400 Total HAC Score: 0.2385Score0.2385 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.8303−0.1384−0.1384
CLABSI1.6649+0.27750.1391
CAUTI−0.0410−0.00680.1323
SSI1.4145+0.23580.3681
CDI−1.0169−0.16950.1986
MRSA0.2397+0.04000.2386
Total HAC Score0.2385
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1414 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.1414 higher, the cut would have been about $309K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $309K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $309K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2385 This hospital 0.2385 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $309K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $309Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2385 This hospital 0.2385

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$308,708
This hospital0.2385$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$308,708

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($30,931,542payment−$79,919readmissions+$19,219value-based)×1%the cut=$308,708at stake

$308,708at stake÷2,249traditional Medicare stays=$137per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $309K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$80K and +$19K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $25,780,472
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,001,056
Outliers: unusually costly stays $264,250
Capital: buildings and equipment $2,142,597
Uncompensated care $1,743,167
Total, before the three programs $30,931,542
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9969 − 1) −$79,919
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0007 − 1) +$19,219
After these two $30,870,842
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $308,708 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$71K to −$49K −$60,700

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$25,780,472
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,001,056
Outliers: unusually costly stays$264,250
Capital: buildings and equipment$2,142,597
Uncompensated care$1,743,167
Total, before the three programs$30,931,542
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9969 − 1))−$79,919
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0007 − 1))+$19,219
After these two$30,870,842
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $308,708)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$71K to −$49K)−$60,700

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.2385same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2385 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $309K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 0.9903
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIup to 0.880
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIup to 0.333
MRSAup to 1.215

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8695 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.324 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.530 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.676 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.115 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.812 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.2385 among its measured results: +0.2775.
  • PSI 90 −0.1384
  • CLABSI +0.2775
  • CAUTI −0.0068
  • SSI +0.2358
  • CDI −0.1695
  • MRSA +0.0400

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.8303−0.1384same
CLABSI1.6649+0.2775same
CAUTI−0.0410−0.0068same
SSI1.4145+0.2358same
CDI−1.0169−0.1695same
MRSA0.2397+0.0400same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.9500, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.7500, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.5300, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.0847, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.1826, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.7237, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.4810, higher than 20% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.0135, higher than 53% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.1714, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0224, higher than 53% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2385, higher than 67% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.9500, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.7500, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.5300, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.0847, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.1826, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.7237, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.4810, higher than 20% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.0135, higher than 53% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.1714, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0224, higher than 53% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2385, higher than 67% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20153.950023.6%not cut
FY20162.75009.4%not cut
FY20174.530033.7%not cut
FY20180.084759.4%not cut
FY2019−0.182638.9%not cut
FY2020−0.723712.7%not cut
FY2021−0.481020.5%not cut
FY20220.013553.8%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.171440.5%not cut
FY20250.022453.6%not cut
FY20260.238567.4%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.85 → 0.51 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.846CLABSI, 2018: 0.145CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 0.871CLABSI, 2022: 1.223CLABSI, 2023: 1.613CLABSI, 2024: 0.506 CAUTI 0.07 → 0.90 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.072CAUTI, 2018: 0.505CAUTI, 2019: 0.775CAUTI, 2021: 0.349CAUTI, 2022: 0.375CAUTI, 2023: 0.416CAUTI, 2024: 0.899 SSI, colon 0.67 → 1.24 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.673SSI, colon, 2018: 0.298SSI, colon, 2019: 1.189SSI, colon, 2021: 1.576SSI, colon, 2022: 2.096SSI, colon, 2023: 2.040SSI, colon, 2024: 1.237 MRSA 0.45 → 0.43 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.453MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 1.770MRSA, 2021: 1.722MRSA, 2022: 0.390MRSA, 2023: 1.155MRSA, 2024: 0.429 C. diff 0.88 → 0.05 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.880C. diff, 2018: 0.353C. diff, 2019: 0.489C. diff, 2021: 0.418C. diff, 2022: 0.377C. diff, 2023: 0.178C. diff, 2024: 0.051 CLABSI 0.85 → 0.51 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.846CLABSI, 2018: 0.145CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 0.871CLABSI, 2022: 1.223CLABSI, 2023: 1.613CLABSI, 2024: 0.506 CAUTI 0.07 → 0.90 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.072CAUTI, 2018: 0.505CAUTI, 2019: 0.775CAUTI, 2021: 0.349CAUTI, 2022: 0.375CAUTI, 2023: 0.416CAUTI, 2024: 0.899 SSI, colon 0.67 → 1.24 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.673SSI, colon, 2018: 0.298SSI, colon, 2019: 1.189SSI, colon, 2021: 1.576SSI, colon, 2022: 2.096SSI, colon, 2023: 2.040SSI, colon, 2024: 1.237 MRSA 0.45 → 0.43 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.453MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 1.770MRSA, 2021: 1.722MRSA, 2022: 0.390MRSA, 2023: 1.155MRSA, 2024: 0.429 C. diff 0.88 → 0.05 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.880C. diff, 2018: 0.353C. diff, 2019: 0.489C. diff, 2021: 0.418C. diff, 2022: 0.377C. diff, 2023: 0.178C. diff, 2024: 0.051

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.8460.0720.6730.4530.880
20180.1450.5050.2980.0000.353
20190.0000.7751.1891.7700.489
20210.8710.3491.5761.7220.418
20221.2230.3752.0960.3900.377
20231.6130.4162.0401.1550.178
20240.5060.8991.2370.4290.051

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Ohio, its score is higher than 61% of the other 113 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 27% (Ohio).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Ohio: CMS cut 31 of 114 (27%); middle score 0.1059Ohio 114 hospitals27% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.2385 This hospital 0.2385 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Ohio: CMS cut 31 of 114 (27%); middle score 0.1059Ohio114 hospitals27% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.2385 This hospital 0.2385

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045367%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026866%
Ohio1143127%0.105961%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105369%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073268%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013466%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057469%
This hospital0.2385
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 10 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. Kettering Health Main Campus, Kettering: score −0.2154, not cut, 24 miles87. Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton: score −0.5161, not cut, 22 miles76. Madison Health, London: score 0.3982, cut, 22 miles65. Kettering Health Dayton, Dayton: score 0.1900, not cut, 22 miles54. Upper Valley Medical Center, Troy: score −0.3371, not cut, 21 miles43. Kettering Health Troy, Troy: score −0.8305, not cut, 19 miles32. Soin Medical Center, Beaver Creek: score 0.0702, not cut, 16 miles21. Ohio Valley Surgical Hospital, Springfield: score −0.1956, not cut, 10 miles1This hospital: Springfield Regional Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Ohio Valley Surgical Hospital, Springfield, OH10−0.1956not cut
Soin Medical Center, Beaver Creek, OH160.0702not cut
Kettering Health Troy, Troy, OH19−0.8305not cut
Upper Valley Medical Center, Troy, OH21−0.3371not cut
Kettering Health Dayton, Dayton, OH220.1900not cut
Madison Health, London, OH220.3982cut
Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, OH22−0.5161not cut
Kettering Health Main Campus, Kettering, OH24−0.2154not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Ohio Valley Surgical HospitalSpringfield, OH10−0.1956No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
2Soin Medical CenterBeaver Creek, OH160.0702No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3Kettering Health TroyTroy, OH19−0.8305No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures
4Upper Valley Medical CenterTroy, OH21−0.3371No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5Kettering Health DaytonDayton, OH220.1900No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
6Madison HealthLondon, OH220.39821% cut$30KAbove the national median on 3 of 3 measures
7Miami Valley HospitalDayton, OH22−0.5161No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
8Kettering Health Main CampusKettering, OH24−0.2154No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Springfield Regional Medical Center, Springfield, OH: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/360086/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.