P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalLexington Memorial Hospital Inc Estimated FY2026 net: −$60K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 340096

1Hospital

Lexington Memorial Hospital Inc

2Location

Lexington, NC (North Carolina’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 27293

Davidson County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 94 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.6702

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

Likely $58⁠–⁠99K; about $129 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$80K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6702 for Lexington Memorial Hospital Inc and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $8.0M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $129 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $58–99K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6702 This hospital 0.6702 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6702 This hospital 0.6702

Higher than 86% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 3 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.3580, to 0.3122. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 55% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9487

    Z-score−0.2773

    Part of score−0.0462

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 94% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.485

    Z-score2.0384

    Part of score+0.3397

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 65% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.640

    Z-score0.2241

    Part of score+0.0374

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 68% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.069

    Z-score0.3747

    Part of score+0.0625

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 81% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.599

    Z-score0.8572

    Part of score+0.1429

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 80% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.082

    Z-score0.8040

    Part of score+0.1340

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.94870.9623−0.2773−0.0462Better than 55% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.4850.5592.0384+0.3397Worse than 94% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.6400.4890.2241+0.0374Worse than 65% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.0690.7950.3747+0.0625Worse than 68% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.5990.3460.8572+0.1429Worse than 81% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.0820.6410.8040+0.1340Worse than 80% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.2773PSI 90+2.0384CLABSI+0.2241CAUTI+0.3747SSI+0.8572CDI+0.8040MRSA)÷6measures=0.6702Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2910 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.6702, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.2773 divided by 6 = −0.0462PSI 90−0.0462 CLABSI: z‑score 2.0384 divided by 6 = +0.3397CLABSI+0.3397 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2241 divided by 6 = +0.0374CAUTI+0.0374 SSI: z‑score 0.3747 divided by 6 = +0.0625SSI+0.0625 CDI: z‑score 0.8572 divided by 6 = +0.1429CDI+0.1429 MRSA: z‑score 0.8040 divided by 6 = +0.1340MRSA+0.1340 Total HAC Score: 0.6702Score0.6702 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.2773 divided by 6 = −0.0462PSI 90−0.0462 CLABSI: z‑score 2.0384 divided by 6 = +0.3397CLABSI+0.3397 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2241 divided by 6 = +0.0374CAUTI+0.0374 SSI: z‑score 0.3747 divided by 6 = +0.0625SSI+0.0625 CDI: z‑score 0.8572 divided by 6 = +0.1429CDI+0.1429 MRSA: z‑score 0.8040 divided by 6 = +0.1340MRSA+0.1340 Total HAC Score: 0.6702Score0.6702 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.2773−0.0462−0.0462
CLABSI2.0384+0.33970.2935
CAUTI0.2241+0.03740.3309
SSI0.3747+0.06250.3934
CDI0.8572+0.14290.5363
MRSA0.8040+0.13400.6703
Total HAC Score0.6702
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2910 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $80K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $80K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $80K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6702 This hospital 0.6702 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $80K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $80Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6702 This hospital 0.6702

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$79,684
This hospital0.6702−$79,684
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$79,684

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($7,948,753payment−$15,726readmissions+$35,333value-based)×1%the cut=$79,684HAC cut

$79,684HAC cut÷619traditional Medicare stays=$129per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $80K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$16K and +$35K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $5,616,332
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $78,292
Outliers: unusually costly stays $8,481
Capital: buildings and equipment $433,063
Uncompensated care $1,812,585
Total, before the three programs $7,948,753
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9972 − 1) −$15,726
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0063 − 1) +$35,333
After these two $7,968,360
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $58⁠–⁠99K −$79,684
Net of the three programs likely −$77K to −$43K −$60,077

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$5,616,332
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$78,292
Outliers: unusually costly stays$8,481
Capital: buildings and equipment$433,063
Uncompensated care$1,812,585
Total, before the three programs$7,948,753
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9972 − 1))−$15,726
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0063 − 1))+$35,333
After these two$7,968,360
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $58–99K)−$79,684
Net of the three programs (likely −$77K to −$43K)−$60,077

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.6702same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$80Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6702 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $80K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSI0.732 or lower
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSI0.049 or lower
CDI0.148 or lower
MRSA0.246 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9487 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.485 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.640 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.069 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.599 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.082 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.6702 among its measured results: +0.3397.
  • PSI 90 −0.0462
  • CLABSI +0.3397
  • CAUTI +0.0374
  • SSI +0.0625
  • CDI +0.1429
  • MRSA +0.1340

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.2773−0.0462same
CLABSI2.0384+0.3397same
CAUTI0.2241+0.0374same
SSI0.3747+0.0625same
CDI0.8572+0.1429same
MRSA0.8040+0.1340same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 3 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.4000, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.0000, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.1333, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.4624, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.2193, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3863, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1731, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.2465, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.6155, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.2992, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.6702, higher than 86% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.4000, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.0000, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.1333, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.4624, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.2193, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3863, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1731, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.2465, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.6155, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.2992, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.6702, higher than 86% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20153.400018.5%not cut
FY20164.000022.1%not cut
FY20175.133345.3%not cut
FY20180.462480.0%cut
FY20190.219367.7%not cut
FY2020−0.386325.4%not cut
FY2021−0.173139.2%not cut
FY20220.246571.8%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.615583.7%cut
FY20250.299271.4%not cut
FY20260.670286.6%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.88 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2019: 0.883CLABSI, 2021: 2.586CLABSI, 2022: 1.421CLABSI, 2023: 0.000 CAUTI 0.91 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2018: 0.913CAUTI, 2019: 0.739CAUTI, 2021: 1.669CAUTI, 2022: 1.488CAUTI, 2023: 1.103CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 2.16 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.826SSI, colon, 2022: 0.732SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 2.161 MRSA 0.97 → 0.95 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2022: 0.973MRSA, 2024: 0.946 C. diff 0.00 → 0.75 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.000C. diff, 2018: 0.553C. diff, 2019: 0.851C. diff, 2021: 0.349C. diff, 2022: 1.087C. diff, 2023: 0.448C. diff, 2024: 0.752 CLABSI 0.88 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2019: 0.883CLABSI, 2021: 2.586CLABSI, 2022: 1.421CLABSI, 2023: 0.000 CAUTI 0.91 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2018: 0.913CAUTI, 2019: 0.739CAUTI, 2021: 1.669CAUTI, 2022: 1.488CAUTI, 2023: 1.103CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 2.16 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.826SSI, colon, 2022: 0.732SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 2.161 MRSA 0.97 → 0.95 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2022: 0.973MRSA, 2024: 0.946 C. diff 0.00 → 0.75 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.000C. diff, 2018: 0.553C. diff, 2019: 0.851C. diff, 2021: 0.349C. diff, 2022: 1.087C. diff, 2023: 0.448C. diff, 2024: 0.752

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.0000.000
20180.9130.0000.553
20190.8830.7390.851
20212.5861.6690.8260.349
20221.4211.4880.7320.9731.087
20230.0001.1030.0000.448
20240.0002.1610.9460.752

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In North Carolina, its score is higher than 88% of the other 78 scored there.

In Winston-Salem, NC area, its score is higher than 100% of the other 4 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 22% (South region) to 40% (Winston-Salem, NC area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut North Carolina: CMS cut 20 of 79 (25%); middle score 0.0502North Carolina 79 hospitals25% cut Winston-Salem, NC area: CMS cut 2 of 5 (40%); middle score −0.1672Winston-Salem, NC area 5 hospitals40% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.6702 This hospital 0.6702 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut North Carolina: CMS cut 20 of 79 (25%); middle score 0.0502North Carolina79 hospitals25% cut Winston-Salem, NC area: CMS cut 2 of 5 (40%); middle score −0.1672Winston-Salem, NC area5 hospitals40% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.6702 This hospital 0.6702

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045386%
South region1,17426322%−0.105687%
North Carolina792025%0.050288%
Winston-Salem, NC area5240%−0.1672100%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105385%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115479%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013486%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057488%
This hospital0.6702
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 11 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Stanly Regional Medical Center, Albemarle: score −0.2761, not cut, 31 miles87. Randolph Hospital, Asheboro: score −0.4334, not cut, 27 miles76. North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Winston-Salem: score 0.6105, cut, 23 miles65. High Point Regional Health System, High Point: score 0.3810, cut, 19 miles54. Novant Health Medical Park Hospital, Winston-Salem: score −1.1460, not cut, 19 miles43. Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem: score −0.2189, not cut, 19 miles32. Novant Health Rowan Medical Center, Salisbury: score −0.5199, not cut, 13 miles21. Novant Health Thomasville Medical Center, Thomasville: score −0.1672, not cut, 11 miles1This hospital: Lexington Memorial Hospital Inc

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Novant Health Thomasville Medical Center, Thomasville, NC11−0.1672not cut
Novant Health Rowan Medical Center, Salisbury, NC13−0.5199not cut
Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC19−0.2189not cut
Novant Health Medical Park Hospital, Winston-Salem, NC19−1.1460not cut
High Point Regional Health System, High Point, NC190.3810cut
North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Winston-Salem, NC230.6105cut
Randolph Hospital, Asheboro, NC27−0.4334not cut
Stanly Regional Medical Center, Albemarle, NC31−0.2761not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Novant Health Thomasville Medical CenterThomasville, NC11−0.1672No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2Novant Health Rowan Medical CenterSalisbury, NC13−0.5199No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
3Novant Health Forsyth Medical CenterWinston-Salem, NC19−0.2189No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
4Novant Health Medical Park HospitalWinston-Salem, NC19−1.1460No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 4 measures
5High Point Regional Health SystemHigh Point, NC190.38101% cut$266KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
6North Carolina Baptist HospitalWinston-Salem, NC230.61051% cut$2.0MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7Randolph HospitalAsheboro, NC27−0.4334No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8Stanly Regional Medical CenterAlbemarle, NC31−0.2761No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Lexington Memorial Hospital Inc, Lexington, NC: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/340096/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.