P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalCanton-Potsdam Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$184K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 330197

1Hospital

Canton-Potsdam Hospital

2Location

Potsdam, NY (New York’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 13676

St. Lawrence County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 56 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.8263

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$155K estimate
Likely $111⁠–⁠174K; about $136 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$155K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.8263 for Canton-Potsdam Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $15.5M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $136 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $111–174K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.8263 This hospital 0.8263 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.8263 This hospital 0.8263

Higher than 90% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 8 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.3917, to 0.4346. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 88% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1778

    Z-score1.3219

    Part of score+0.2203

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 96% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.726

    Z-score2.2402

    Part of score+0.3734

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 70% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.701

    Z-score0.3712

    Part of score+0.0619

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 87% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4565

    Part of score−0.2428

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 98% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.354

    Z-score2.1931

    Part of score+0.3655

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 66% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.835

    Z-score0.2878

    Part of score+0.0480

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.17780.96231.3219+0.2203Worse than 88% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.7260.5592.2402+0.3734Worse than 96% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.7010.4890.3712+0.0619Worse than 70% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.0000.795−1.4565−0.2428Better than 87% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI1.3540.3462.1931+0.3655Worse than 98% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.8350.6410.2878+0.0480Worse than 66% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.3219PSI 90+2.2402CLABSI+0.3712CAUTI−1.4565SSI+2.1931CDI+0.2878MRSA)÷6measures=0.8263Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.4471 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.8263, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.3219 divided by 6 = +0.2203PSI 90+0.2203 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score 0.3712 divided by 6 = +0.0619CAUTI+0.0619 SSI: z‑score −1.4565 divided by 6 = −0.2428SSI−0.2428 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 6 = +0.3655CDI+0.3655 MRSA: z‑score 0.2878 divided by 6 = +0.0480MRSA+0.0480 Total HAC Score: 0.8263Score0.8263 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.3219 divided by 6 = +0.2203PSI 90+0.2203 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score 0.3712 divided by 6 = +0.0619CAUTI+0.0619 SSI: z‑score −1.4565 divided by 6 = −0.2428SSI−0.2428 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 6 = +0.3655CDI+0.3655 MRSA: z‑score 0.2878 divided by 6 = +0.0480MRSA+0.0480 Total HAC Score: 0.8263Score0.8263 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.3219+0.22030.2203
CLABSI2.2402+0.37340.5937
CAUTI0.3712+0.06190.6556
SSI−1.4565−0.24280.4128
CDI2.1931+0.36550.7783
MRSA0.2878+0.04800.8263
Total HAC Score0.8263
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.4471 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $155K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $155K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $155K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.8263 This hospital 0.8263 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $155K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $155Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.8263 This hospital 0.8263

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$155,424
This hospital0.8263−$155,424
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$155,424

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($15,570,939payment−$44,902readmissions+$16,399value-based)×1%the cut=$155,424HAC cut

$155,424HAC cut÷1,144traditional Medicare stays=$136per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $155K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$45K and +$16K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $13,606,779
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $408,203
Outliers: unusually costly stays $69,803
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,054,219
Uncompensated care $431,935
Total, before the three programs $15,570,939
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9967 − 1) −$44,902
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0012 − 1) +$16,399
After these two $15,542,436
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $111⁠–⁠174K −$155,424
Net of the three programs likely −$195K to −$128K −$183,927

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$13,606,779
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$408,203
Outliers: unusually costly stays$69,803
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,054,219
Uncompensated care$431,935
Total, before the three programs$15,570,939
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9967 − 1))−$44,902
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0012 − 1))+$16,399
After these two$15,542,436
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $111–174K)−$155,424
Net of the three programs (likely −$195K to −$128K)−$183,927

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.8263same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$155Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.8263 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $155K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.7934 or lower
CLABSI0.415 or lower
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDI0.251 or lower
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1778 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.726 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.701 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.000 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 1.354 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.835 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.8263 among its measured results: +0.3734.
  • PSI 90 +0.2203
  • CLABSI +0.3734
  • CAUTI +0.0619
  • SSI −0.2428
  • CDI +0.3655
  • MRSA +0.0480

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.3219+0.2203same
CLABSI2.2402+0.3734same
CAUTI0.3712+0.0619same
SSI−1.4565−0.2428same
CDI2.1931+0.3655same
MRSA0.2878+0.0480same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 5 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 8 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.9000, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.0000, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.2375, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.4038, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.627, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.7147, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.6337, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2022: score 1.0527, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2024: score 1.4387, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.2681, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.8263, higher than 90% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.9000, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.0000, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.2375, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.4038, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.627, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.7147, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.6337, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2022: score 1.0527, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2024: score 1.4387, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.2681, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.8263, higher than 90% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.900072.1%not cut
FY20165.000038.0%not cut
FY20175.237547.0%not cut
FY20180.403877.5%cut
FY20190.62786.4%cut
FY20200.714789.6%cut
FY20210.633788.6%cut
FY20221.052796.1%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20241.438796.7%cut
FY20251.268196.8%cut
FY20260.826390.5%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.95 → 0.92 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.950CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.951CLABSI, 2021: 3.978CLABSI, 2022: 2.846CLABSI, 2023: 2.451CLABSI, 2024: 0.915 CAUTI 2.40 → 0.79 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 2.397CAUTI, 2018: 0.440CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.854CAUTI, 2022: 0.331CAUTI, 2023: 0.633CAUTI, 2024: 0.786 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.95 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 1.660SSI, colon, 2021: 2.671SSI, colon, 2022: 0.946 C. diff 1.46 → 1.20 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.455C. diff, 2018: 1.340C. diff, 2019: 2.568C. diff, 2021: 1.259C. diff, 2022: 1.866C. diff, 2023: 1.511C. diff, 2024: 1.196 CLABSI 0.95 → 0.92 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.950CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.951CLABSI, 2021: 3.978CLABSI, 2022: 2.846CLABSI, 2023: 2.451CLABSI, 2024: 0.915 CAUTI 2.40 → 0.79 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 2.397CAUTI, 2018: 0.440CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.854CAUTI, 2022: 0.331CAUTI, 2023: 0.633CAUTI, 2024: 0.786 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.95 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 1.660SSI, colon, 2021: 2.671SSI, colon, 2022: 0.946 C. diff 1.46 → 1.20 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.455C. diff, 2018: 1.340C. diff, 2019: 2.568C. diff, 2021: 1.259C. diff, 2022: 1.866C. diff, 2023: 1.511C. diff, 2024: 1.196

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonC. diff
20170.9502.3970.0001.455
20180.0000.4401.340
20190.9510.0001.6602.568
20213.9780.8542.6711.259
20222.8460.3310.9461.866
20232.4510.6331.511
20240.9150.7861.196

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In New York, its score is higher than 83% of the other 125 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 25% (All hospitals) to 36% (New York).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region 436 hospitals28% cut New York: CMS cut 45 of 126 (36%); middle score 0.1614New York 126 hospitals36% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.8263 This hospital 0.8263 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region436 hospitals28% cut New York: CMS cut 45 of 126 (36%); middle score 0.1614New York126 hospitals36% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.8263 This hospital 0.8263

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045390%
Northeast region43612428%0.047889%
New York1264536%0.161483%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105388%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115483%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013491%
Rural61919632%0.022983%
This hospital0.8263
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 6 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 47 miles away.
25 mi50 mi100 mi8. Oswego Hospital, Oswego: score 0.3700, not cut, 114 miles87. Wynn Hospital, Utica: score 1.0451, cut, 110 miles76. Rome Memorial Hospital, Inc, Rome: score 0.5942, cut, 103 miles65. Northwestern Medical Center Inc, Saint Albans: score 1.0663, cut, 94 miles54. Univ. of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington: score 1.0951, cut, 89 miles43. The University of Vermont Health Network - Champl, Plattsburgh: score 1.0661, cut, 74 miles32. Samaritan Medical Center, Watertown: score 0.0497, not cut, 67 miles21. Adirondack Medical Center - Saranac Lake, Saranac Lake: score 0.9345, cut, 47 miles1This hospital: Canton-Potsdam Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Adirondack Medical Center - Saranac Lake, Saranac Lake, NY470.9345cut
Samaritan Medical Center, Watertown, NY670.0497not cut
The University of Vermont Health Network - Champl, Plattsburgh, NY741.0661cut
Univ. of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, VT891.0951cut
Northwestern Medical Center Inc, Saint Albans, VT941.0663cut
Rome Memorial Hospital, Inc, Rome, NY1030.5942cut
Wynn Hospital, Utica, NY1101.0451cut
Oswego Hospital, Oswego, NY1140.3700not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Adirondack Medical Center - Saranac LakeSaranac Lake, NY470.93451% cut$139KAbove the national median on 5 of 5 measures
2Samaritan Medical CenterWatertown, NY670.0497No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3The University of Vermont Health Network - ChamplPlattsburgh, NY741.06611% cut$432KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
4Univ. of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health CareBurlington, VT891.09511% cut$1.6MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
5Northwestern Medical Center IncSaint Albans, VT941.06631% cut$140KAbove the national median on 4 of 4 measures
6Rome Memorial Hospital, IncRome, NY1030.59421% cut$140KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Wynn HospitalUtica, NY1101.04511% cut$827KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
8Oswego HospitalOswego, NY1140.3700No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 5 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Canton-Potsdam Hospital, Potsdam, NY: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/330197/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.