P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalPresbyterian Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$777K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 320021

1Hospital

Presbyterian Hospital

2Location

Albuquerque, NM (New Mexico’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 87106

Bernalillo County

3Type

Minor teaching · 623 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.8675

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$1.0M estimate
Likely $852K⁠–⁠$1.1M; about $163 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$1.0M

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.8675 for Presbyterian Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $105M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $163 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $852K–$1.1M

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.8675 This hospital 0.8675 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.8675 This hospital 0.8675

Higher than 91% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 11 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.4490, to 0.4185. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.4694

    Z-score2.5111

    Part of score+0.4185

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 68% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.763

    Z-score0.3635

    Part of score+0.0606

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 83% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.918

    Z-score0.8942

    Part of score+0.1490

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 71% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.144

    Z-score0.5032

    Part of score+0.0839

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 85% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.671

    Z-score1.1360

    Part of score+0.1893

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 53% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.600

    Z-score−0.2033

    Part of score−0.0339

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.46940.96232.5111+0.4185Worse than 97% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.7630.5590.3635+0.0606Worse than 68% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.9180.4890.8942+0.1490Worse than 83% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.1440.7950.5032+0.0839Worse than 71% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.6710.3461.1360+0.1893Worse than 85% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.6000.641−0.2033−0.0339Better than 53% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(2.5111PSI 90+0.3635CLABSI+0.8942CAUTI+0.5032SSI+1.1360CDI−0.2033MRSA)÷6measures=0.8675Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.4883 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.8675, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.3635 divided by 6 = +0.0606CLABSI+0.0606 CAUTI: z‑score 0.8942 divided by 6 = +0.1490CAUTI+0.1490 SSI: z‑score 0.5032 divided by 6 = +0.0839SSI+0.0839 CDI: z‑score 1.1360 divided by 6 = +0.1893CDI+0.1893 MRSA: z‑score −0.2033 divided by 6 = −0.0339MRSA−0.0339 Total HAC Score: 0.8675Score0.8675 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.3635 divided by 6 = +0.0606CLABSI+0.0606 CAUTI: z‑score 0.8942 divided by 6 = +0.1490CAUTI+0.1490 SSI: z‑score 0.5032 divided by 6 = +0.0839SSI+0.0839 CDI: z‑score 1.1360 divided by 6 = +0.1893CDI+0.1893 MRSA: z‑score −0.2033 divided by 6 = −0.0339MRSA−0.0339 Total HAC Score: 0.8675Score0.8675 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 902.5111+0.41850.4185
CLABSI0.3635+0.06060.4791
CAUTI0.8942+0.14900.6281
SSI0.5032+0.08390.7120
CDI1.1360+0.18930.9013
MRSA−0.2033−0.03390.8674
Total HAC Score0.8675
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.4883 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $1.0M by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.8675 This hospital 0.8675 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.8675 This hospital 0.8675

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$1,046,623
This hospital0.8675−$1,046,623
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$1,046,623

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($104,047,646payment+$345,212teaching, MA stays−$24,782readmissions+$294,193value-based)×1%the cut=$1,046,623HAC cut

$1,046,623HAC cut÷6,437traditional Medicare stays=$163per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $1.0M: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$25K and +$294K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $82,606,856
Teaching (indirect medical education) $180,083
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $345,212
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $4,756,503
Outliers: unusually costly stays $3,081,236
Capital: buildings and equipment $6,997,933
Uncompensated care $6,425,035
Total, before the three programs $104,392,858
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9997 − 1) −$24,782
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0036 − 1) +$294,193
After these two $104,662,269
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $852K⁠–⁠$1.1M −$1,046,623
Net of the three programs likely −$851K to −$672K −$777,212

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$82,606,856
Teaching (indirect medical education)$180,083
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$345,212
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$4,756,503
Outliers: unusually costly stays$3,081,236
Capital: buildings and equipment$6,997,933
Uncompensated care$6,425,035
Total, before the three programs$104,392,858
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9997 − 1))−$24,782
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0036 − 1))+$294,193
After these two$104,662,269
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $852K–$1.1M)−$1,046,623
Net of the three programs (likely −$851K to −$672K)−$777,212

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.8675same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$1.0Msame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.8675 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $1.0M, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.9284 or lower
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.4694 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.763 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.918 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.144 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.671 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.600 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.8675 among its measured results: +0.4185.
  • PSI 90 +0.4185
  • CLABSI +0.0606
  • CAUTI +0.1490
  • SSI +0.0839
  • CDI +0.1893
  • MRSA −0.0339

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 902.5111+0.4185same
CLABSI0.3635+0.0606same
CAUTI0.8942+0.1490same
SSI0.5032+0.0839same
CDI1.1360+0.1893same
MRSA−0.2033−0.0339same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/320021/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 8 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 11 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.6750, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2016: score 8.2500, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.9800, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.5162, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.6599, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.4589, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.4460, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.7347, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.7416, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.5790, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.8675, higher than 91% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.6750, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2016: score 8.2500, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.9800, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.5162, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.6599, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.4589, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.4460, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.7347, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.7416, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.5790, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.8675, higher than 91% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.675085.5%cut
FY20168.250092.1%cut
FY20177.980093.4%cut
FY20180.516282.4%cut
FY20190.659987.4%cut
FY20200.458981.3%cut
FY20210.446080.2%cut
FY20220.734789.9%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.741687.5%cut
FY20250.579084.3%cut
FY20260.867591.2%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.35 → 0.72 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.354CLABSI, 2018: 0.485CLABSI, 2019: 1.043CLABSI, 2021: 2.986CLABSI, 2022: 1.385CLABSI, 2023: 0.803CLABSI, 2024: 0.723 CAUTI 0.86 → 1.31 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.863CAUTI, 2018: 2.162CAUTI, 2019: 2.323CAUTI, 2021: 2.994CAUTI, 2022: 2.280CAUTI, 2023: 0.525CAUTI, 2024: 1.310 SSI, colon 1.87 → 0.81 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.874SSI, colon, 2018: 0.496SSI, colon, 2019: 1.496SSI, colon, 2021: 1.349SSI, colon, 2022: 0.578SSI, colon, 2023: 1.019SSI, colon, 2024: 0.812 SSI, hysterectomy 1.14 → 2.45 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.136SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.064SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.370SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.585SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.773SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.438SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 2.446 MRSA 0.73 → 0.47 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.734MRSA, 2018: 0.236MRSA, 2019: 1.150MRSA, 2021: 1.554MRSA, 2022: 0.828MRSA, 2023: 0.727MRSA, 2024: 0.469 C. diff 0.95 → 0.77 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.952C. diff, 2018: 1.050C. diff, 2019: 0.880C. diff, 2021: 0.734C. diff, 2022: 0.713C. diff, 2023: 0.559C. diff, 2024: 0.773 CLABSI 1.35 → 0.72 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.354CLABSI, 2018: 0.485CLABSI, 2019: 1.043CLABSI, 2021: 2.986CLABSI, 2022: 1.385CLABSI, 2023: 0.803CLABSI, 2024: 0.723 CAUTI 0.86 → 1.31 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.863CAUTI, 2018: 2.162CAUTI, 2019: 2.323CAUTI, 2021: 2.994CAUTI, 2022: 2.280CAUTI, 2023: 0.525CAUTI, 2024: 1.310 SSI, colon 1.87 → 0.81 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.874SSI, colon, 2018: 0.496SSI, colon, 2019: 1.496SSI, colon, 2021: 1.349SSI, colon, 2022: 0.578SSI, colon, 2023: 1.019SSI, colon, 2024: 0.812 SSI, hysterectomy 1.14 → 2.45 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.136SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.064SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.370SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.585SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.773SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.438SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 2.446 MRSA 0.73 → 0.47 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.734MRSA, 2018: 0.236MRSA, 2019: 1.150MRSA, 2021: 1.554MRSA, 2022: 0.828MRSA, 2023: 0.727MRSA, 2024: 0.469 C. diff 0.95 → 0.77 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.952C. diff, 2018: 1.050C. diff, 2019: 0.880C. diff, 2021: 0.734C. diff, 2022: 0.713C. diff, 2023: 0.559C. diff, 2024: 0.773

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20171.3540.8631.8741.1360.7340.952
20180.4852.1620.4961.0640.2361.050
20191.0432.3231.4960.3701.1500.880
20212.9862.9941.3491.5851.5540.734
20221.3852.2800.5781.7730.8280.713
20230.8030.5251.0191.4380.7270.559
20240.7231.3100.8122.4460.4690.773

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In New Mexico, its score is higher than 76% of the other 25 scored there.

In Albuquerque, NM area, its score is higher than 75% of the other 4 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 42% (New Mexico).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut New Mexico: CMS cut 11 of 26 (42%); middle score 0.0516New Mexico 26 hospitals42% cut Albuquerque, NM area: CMS cut 2 of 5 (40%); middle score −0.0393Albuquerque, NM area 5 hospitals40% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up 365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.8675 This hospital 0.8675 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut New Mexico: CMS cut 11 of 26 (42%); middle score 0.0516New Mexico26 hospitals42% cut Albuquerque, NM area: CMS cut 2 of 5 (40%); middle score −0.0393Albuquerque, NM area5 hospitals40% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.8675 This hospital 0.8675

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045391%
West region59315726%−0.030290%
New Mexico261142%0.051676%
Albuquerque, NM area5240%−0.039375%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056795%
500 beds and up36510529%0.132394%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013491%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057493%
This hospital0.8675
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 4 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is less than a mile away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Santa Fe PHS Indian Hospital, Santa Fe: score 2.2433, cut, 62 miles87. Los Alamos Medical Center, Los Alamos: score 0.7480, cut, 58 miles76. CHRISTUS St Vincent Regional Medical Center, Santa Fe: score 0.4718, cut, 57 miles65. Presbyterian Santa Fe Medical Center, Santa Fe: score −0.3531, not cut, 50 miles54. Lovelace Westside Hospital, Albuquerque: score −0.1625, not cut, 9 miles43. Lovelace Women's Hospital, Albuquerque: score −0.2492, not cut, 4 miles32. UNM Hospital, Albuquerque: score 1.0058, cut, about a mile21. Lovelace Medical Center, Albuquerque: score −0.0393, not cut, less than a mile1This hospital: Presbyterian Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Lovelace Medical Center, Albuquerque, NMunder 1−0.0393not cut
UNM Hospital, Albuquerque, NM11.0058cut
Lovelace Women's Hospital, Albuquerque, NM4−0.2492not cut
Lovelace Westside Hospital, Albuquerque, NM9−0.1625not cut
Presbyterian Santa Fe Medical Center, Santa Fe, NM50−0.3531not cut
CHRISTUS St Vincent Regional Medical Center, Santa Fe, NM570.4718cut
Los Alamos Medical Center, Los Alamos, NM580.7480cut
Santa Fe PHS Indian Hospital, Santa Fe, NM622.2433cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Lovelace Medical CenterAlbuquerque, NMunder 1−0.0393No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2UNM HospitalAlbuquerque, NM11.00581% cut$1.2MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
3Lovelace Women's HospitalAlbuquerque, NM4−0.2492No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
4Lovelace Westside HospitalAlbuquerque, NM9−0.1625No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
5Presbyterian Santa Fe Medical CenterSanta Fe, NM50−0.3531No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 3 measures
6CHRISTUS St Vincent Regional Medical CenterSanta Fe, NM570.47181% cut$607KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Los Alamos Medical CenterLos Alamos, NM580.74801% cut$49KAbove the national median on 2 of 2 measures
8Santa Fe PHS Indian HospitalSanta Fe, NM622.24331% cutno estimateAbove the national median on 5 of 5 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Presbyterian Hospital, Albuquerque, NM: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/320021/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.