P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalCarewell Health Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$141K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 310083

1Hospital

Carewell Health Medical Center

2Location

East Orange, NJ (New Jersey’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 07018

Essex County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 211 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

1 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.7148

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

Likely $63⁠–⁠103K; about $208 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$82K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7148 for Carewell Health Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $8.2M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $208 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $63–103K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7148 This hospital 0.7148 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7148 This hospital 0.7148

Higher than 87% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 5 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing MRSA down to the national median (0.641) would lower the score the most: by 0.4686, to 0.2462. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 5 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 85% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1397

    Z-score1.0559

    Part of score+0.2112

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 89% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.218

    Z-score1.4190

    Part of score+0.2838

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 63% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.619

    Z-score0.1735

    Part of score+0.0347

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 90% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.042

    Z-score−1.2995

    Part of score−0.2599

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 96% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.965

    Z-score2.2251

    Part of score+0.4450

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.13970.96231.0559+0.2112Worse than 85% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.2180.5591.4190+0.2838Worse than 89% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.6190.4890.1735+0.0347Worse than 63% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDI0.0420.346−1.2995−0.2599Better than 90% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.9650.6412.2251+0.4450Worse than 96% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.0559PSI 90+1.4190CLABSI+0.1735CAUTI−1.2995CDI+2.2251MRSA)÷5measures=0.7148Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.3356 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.7148, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.0559 divided by 5 = +0.2112PSI 90+0.2112 CLABSI: z‑score 1.4190 divided by 5 = +0.2838CLABSI+0.2838 CAUTI: z‑score 0.1735 divided by 5 = +0.0347CAUTI+0.0347 CDI: z‑score −1.2995 divided by 5 = −0.2599CDI−0.2599 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: 0.7148Score0.7148 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.0559 divided by 5 = +0.2112PSI 90+0.2112 CLABSI: z‑score 1.4190 divided by 5 = +0.2838CLABSI+0.2838 CAUTI: z‑score 0.1735 divided by 5 = +0.0347CAUTI+0.0347 CDI: z‑score −1.2995 divided by 5 = −0.2599CDI−0.2599 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: 0.7148Score0.7148 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.0559+0.21120.2112
CLABSI1.4190+0.28380.4950
CAUTI0.1735+0.03470.5297
CDI−1.2995−0.25990.2698
MRSA2.2251+0.44500.7148
Total HAC Score0.7148
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.3356 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $82K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $82K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $82K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7148 This hospital 0.7148 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $82K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $82Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7148 This hospital 0.7148

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$82,262
This hospital0.7148−$82,262
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$82,262

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($8,285,399payment−$59,185readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$82,262HAC cut

$82,262HAC cut÷396traditional Medicare stays=$208per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $82K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$59K and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $4,773,000
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $56,990
Outliers: unusually costly stays $2,330,179
Capital: buildings and equipment $384,770
Uncompensated care $740,460
Total, before the three programs $8,285,399
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9876 − 1) −$59,185
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $8,226,214
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $63⁠–⁠103K −$82,262
Net of the three programs likely −$166K to −$114K −$141,447

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$4,773,000
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$56,990
Outliers: unusually costly stays$2,330,179
Capital: buildings and equipment$384,770
Uncompensated care$740,460
Total, before the three programs$8,285,399
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9876 − 1))−$59,185
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$8,226,214
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $63–103K)−$82,262
Net of the three programs (likely −$166K to −$114K)−$141,447

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.7148same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$82Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7148 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $82K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.8992 or lower
CLABSI0.494 or lower
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSA0.959 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1397 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 1.218 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0464

CMS 0.619 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

CMS 0.042 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

CMS 1.965 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0418

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.7148 among its measured results: +0.4450.
  • PSI 90 +0.2112
  • CLABSI +0.2838
  • CAUTI +0.0347
  • CDI −0.2599
  • MRSA +0.4450

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.0559+0.2112same
CLABSI1.4190+0.2838same
CAUTI0.1735+0.0347same
CDI−1.2995−0.2599same
MRSA2.2251+0.4450same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 4 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 5 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.9750, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.9100, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.0616, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.5896, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.7435, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.7850, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.6324, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.4341, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.0948, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.7148, higher than 87% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.9750, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.9100, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.0616, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.5896, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.7435, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.7850, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.6324, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.4341, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.0948, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.7148, higher than 87% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20151.97504.3%not cut
FY20162.25006.2%not cut
FY20174.910040.3%not cut
FY20180.061657.7%not cut
FY20190.589685.4%cut
FY20200.743590.2%cut
FY20210.785092.2%cut
FY20220.632487.1%cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.434123.1%not cut
FY2025−0.094845.5%not cut
FY20260.714887.8%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 2.05 → 2.20 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.048CLABSI, 2018: 1.212CLABSI, 2019: 0.719CLABSI, 2021: 0.942CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 2.199 CAUTI 0.84 → 2.98 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.845CAUTI, 2018: 1.152CAUTI, 2019: 0.515CAUTI, 2021: 2.985 MRSA 2.23 → 1.98 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 2.229MRSA, 2018: 2.841MRSA, 2019: 0.549MRSA, 2021: 0.780MRSA, 2022: 0.797MRSA, 2023: 1.953MRSA, 2024: 1.976 C. diff 1.06 → 0.08 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.058C. diff, 2018: 0.802C. diff, 2019: 1.010C. diff, 2021: 0.091C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.083 CLABSI 2.05 → 2.20 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.048CLABSI, 2018: 1.212CLABSI, 2019: 0.719CLABSI, 2021: 0.942CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 2.199 CAUTI 0.84 → 2.98 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.845CAUTI, 2018: 1.152CAUTI, 2019: 0.515CAUTI, 2021: 2.985 MRSA 2.23 → 1.98 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 2.229MRSA, 2018: 2.841MRSA, 2019: 0.549MRSA, 2021: 0.780MRSA, 2022: 0.797MRSA, 2023: 1.953MRSA, 2024: 1.976 C. diff 1.06 → 0.08 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.058C. diff, 2018: 0.802C. diff, 2019: 1.010C. diff, 2021: 0.091C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.083

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIMRSAC. diff
20172.0480.8452.2291.058
20181.2121.1522.8410.802
20190.7190.5150.5491.010
20210.9422.9850.7800.091
20220.0000.7970.000
20230.0001.9530.000
20242.1991.9760.083

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In New Jersey, its score is higher than 98% of the other 60 scored there.

In Newark, NJ area, its score is higher than 100% of the other 14 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 8% (New Jersey) to 28% (Northeast region).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region 436 hospitals28% cut New Jersey: CMS cut 5 of 61 (8%); middle score −0.1613New Jersey 61 hospitals8% cut Newark, NJ area: CMS cut 2 of 15 (13%); middle score −0.3448Newark, NJ area 15 hospitals13% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.7148 This hospital 0.7148 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region436 hospitals28% cut New Jersey: CMS cut 5 of 61 (8%); middle score −0.1613New Jersey61 hospitals8% cut Newark, NJ area: CMS cut 2 of 15 (13%); middle score −0.3448Newark, NJ area15 hospitals13% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.7148 This hospital 0.7148

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045387%
Northeast region43612428%0.047886%
New Jersey6158%−0.161398%
Newark, NJ area15213%−0.3448100%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105386%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073290%
For-profit6519815%−0.259093%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057490%
This hospital0.7148
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut none of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi8. Overlook Medical Center, Summit: score −0.4445, not cut, 8 miles87. Trinitas Regional Medical Center, Elizabeth: score −0.7689, not cut, 7 miles76. Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston: score −0.3448, not cut, 4 miles65. Hackensack Meridian Mountainside Medical, Montclair: score 0.0621, not cut, 4 miles54. Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark: score −0.2395, not cut, 3 miles43. Clara Maass Medical Center, Belleville: score −0.6214, not cut, 3 miles32. Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark: score −0.4521, not cut, 2 miles21. The University Hospital, Newark: score 0.2325, not cut, 2 miles1This hospital: Carewell Health Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
The University Hospital, Newark, NJ20.2325not cut
Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, NJ2−0.4521not cut
Clara Maass Medical Center, Belleville, NJ3−0.6214not cut
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, NJ3−0.2395not cut
Hackensack Meridian Mountainside Medical, Montclair, NJ40.0621not cut
Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ4−0.3448not cut
Trinitas Regional Medical Center, Elizabeth, NJ7−0.7689not cut
Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ8−0.4445not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1The University HospitalNewark, NJ20.2325No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2Saint Michael's Medical CenterNewark, NJ2−0.4521No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
3Clara Maass Medical CenterBelleville, NJ3−0.6214No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
4Newark Beth Israel Medical CenterNewark, NJ3−0.2395No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5Hackensack Meridian Mountainside MedicalMontclair, NJ40.0621No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6Cooperman Barnabas Medical CenterLivingston, NJ4−0.3448No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
7Trinitas Regional Medical CenterElizabeth, NJ7−0.7689No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
8Overlook Medical CenterSummit, NJ8−0.4445No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Carewell Health Medical Center, East Orange, NJ: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/310083/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.