P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalRobert Wood Johnson University Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$2.9M×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 310038

1Hospital

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

2Location

New Brunswick, NJ (New Jersey’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 08901

Middlesex County

3Type

Major teaching · 610 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.2232

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $2.3M, likely $1.8⁠–⁠2.5M estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2232 for Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $2.3M estimate 1% of about $227M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.1567 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $1.8–2.5M

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2232 This hospital 0.2232 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2232 This hospital 0.2232

Higher than 66% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 9 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.2139, to 0.0093. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 85% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1461

    Z-score1.1003

    Part of score+0.1834

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 61% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.450

    Z-score−0.3626

    Part of score−0.0604

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 59% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.585

    Z-score0.0915

    Part of score+0.0153

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 76% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.263

    Z-score0.7070

    Part of score+0.1178

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 55% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.315

    Z-score−0.2425

    Part of score−0.0404

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 57% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.719

    Z-score0.0454

    Part of score+0.0076

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.14610.96231.1003+0.1834Worse than 85% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.4500.559−0.3626−0.0604Better than 61% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.5850.4890.0915+0.0153Worse than 59% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.2630.7950.7070+0.1178Worse than 76% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.3150.346−0.2425−0.0404Better than 55% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.7190.6410.0454+0.0076Worse than 57% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.1003PSI 90−0.3626CLABSI+0.0915CAUTI+0.7070SSI−0.2425CDI+0.0454MRSA)÷6measures=0.2232Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.1567 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.2232, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.1003 divided by 6 = +0.1834PSI 90+0.1834 CLABSI: z‑score −0.3626 divided by 6 = −0.0604CLABSI−0.0604 CAUTI: z‑score 0.0915 divided by 6 = +0.0153CAUTI+0.0153 SSI: z‑score 0.7070 divided by 6 = +0.1178SSI+0.1178 CDI: z‑score −0.2425 divided by 6 = −0.0404CDI−0.0404 MRSA: z‑score 0.0454 divided by 6 = +0.0076MRSA+0.0076 Total HAC Score: 0.2232Score0.2232 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.1003 divided by 6 = +0.1834PSI 90+0.1834 CLABSI: z‑score −0.3626 divided by 6 = −0.0604CLABSI−0.0604 CAUTI: z‑score 0.0915 divided by 6 = +0.0153CAUTI+0.0153 SSI: z‑score 0.7070 divided by 6 = +0.1178SSI+0.1178 CDI: z‑score −0.2425 divided by 6 = −0.0404CDI−0.0404 MRSA: z‑score 0.0454 divided by 6 = +0.0076MRSA+0.0076 Total HAC Score: 0.2232Score0.2232 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.1003+0.18340.1834
CLABSI−0.3626−0.06040.1230
CAUTI0.0915+0.01530.1383
SSI0.7070+0.11780.2561
CDI−0.2425−0.04040.2157
MRSA0.0454+0.00760.2233
Total HAC Score0.2232
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1567 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.1567 higher, the cut would have been about $2.3M by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $2.3M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $2.3M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2232 This hospital 0.2232 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $2.3M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $2.3Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2232 This hospital 0.2232

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$2,269,152
This hospital0.2232$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$2,269,152

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($211,284,812payment+$18,551,074teaching, MA stays−$2,785,791readmissions−$134,860value-based)×1%the cut=$2,269,152at stake

$2,269,152at stake÷7,127traditional Medicare stays=$318per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $2.3M by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$2.8M and −$135K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $130,177,149
Teaching (indirect medical education) $23,388,928
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $18,551,074
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $5,706,966
Outliers: unusually costly stays $26,107,027
Capital: buildings and equipment $12,938,975
Uncompensated care $12,965,767
Total, before the three programs $229,835,886
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9786 − 1) −$2,785,791
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9990 − 1) −$134,860
After these two $226,915,235
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $2,269,152 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$3.2M to −$2.5M −$2,920,651

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$130,177,149
Teaching (indirect medical education)$23,388,928
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$18,551,074
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$5,706,966
Outliers: unusually costly stays$26,107,027
Capital: buildings and equipment$12,938,975
Uncompensated care$12,965,767
Total, before the three programs$229,835,886
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9786 − 1))−$2,785,791
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9990 − 1))−$134,860
After these two$226,915,235
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $2,269,152)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$3.2M to −$2.5M)−$2,920,651

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.2232same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2232 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $2.3M out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.2800
CLABSIup to 0.853
CAUTIup to 0.973
SSIup to 1.809
CDIup to 0.556
MRSAup to 1.166

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1461 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.450 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.585 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.263 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.315 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.719 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.2232 among its measured results: +0.1834.
  • PSI 90 +0.1834
  • CLABSI −0.0604
  • CAUTI +0.0153
  • SSI +0.1178
  • CDI −0.0404
  • MRSA +0.0076

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.1003+0.1834same
CLABSI−0.3626−0.0604same
CAUTI0.0915+0.0153same
SSI0.7070+0.1178same
CDI−0.2425−0.0404same
MRSA0.0454+0.0076same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 8 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 9 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 9.0250, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2016: score 9.0000, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2017: score 8.9800, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.8273, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.6498, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.4289, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.3910, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.3592, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.4433, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.2934, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2232, higher than 66% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 9.0250, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2016: score 9.0000, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2017: score 8.9800, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.8273, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.6498, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.4289, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.3910, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.3592, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.4433, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.2934, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2232, higher than 66% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20159.025097.2%cut
FY20169.000096.3%cut
FY20178.980097.7%cut
FY20180.827391.2%cut
FY20190.649887.0%cut
FY20200.428979.9%cut
FY20210.391077.4%cut
FY20220.359277.8%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.443377.9%cut
FY20250.293471.2%not cut
FY20260.223266.3%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.50 → 0.47 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.496CLABSI, 2018: 0.382CLABSI, 2019: 0.167CLABSI, 2021: 0.540CLABSI, 2022: 0.594CLABSI, 2023: 0.426CLABSI, 2024: 0.471 CAUTI 1.51 → 0.51 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.509CAUTI, 2018: 1.178CAUTI, 2019: 1.319CAUTI, 2021: 0.728CAUTI, 2022: 0.695CAUTI, 2023: 0.671CAUTI, 2024: 0.508 SSI, colon 0.34 → 1.42 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.343SSI, colon, 2018: 0.627SSI, colon, 2019: 0.680SSI, colon, 2021: 0.443SSI, colon, 2022: 0.984SSI, colon, 2023: 0.846SSI, colon, 2024: 1.416 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 2.57 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.474SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.947SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.650SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.962SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 2.567 MRSA 1.54 → 0.74 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.538MRSA, 2018: 1.643MRSA, 2019: 0.405MRSA, 2021: 1.069MRSA, 2022: 1.187MRSA, 2023: 0.691MRSA, 2024: 0.738 C. diff 1.09 → 0.28 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.091C. diff, 2018: 0.922C. diff, 2019: 0.902C. diff, 2021: 0.687C. diff, 2022: 0.570C. diff, 2023: 0.340C. diff, 2024: 0.283 CLABSI 0.50 → 0.47 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.496CLABSI, 2018: 0.382CLABSI, 2019: 0.167CLABSI, 2021: 0.540CLABSI, 2022: 0.594CLABSI, 2023: 0.426CLABSI, 2024: 0.471 CAUTI 1.51 → 0.51 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.509CAUTI, 2018: 1.178CAUTI, 2019: 1.319CAUTI, 2021: 0.728CAUTI, 2022: 0.695CAUTI, 2023: 0.671CAUTI, 2024: 0.508 SSI, colon 0.34 → 1.42 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.343SSI, colon, 2018: 0.627SSI, colon, 2019: 0.680SSI, colon, 2021: 0.443SSI, colon, 2022: 0.984SSI, colon, 2023: 0.846SSI, colon, 2024: 1.416 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 2.57 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.474SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.947SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.650SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.962SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 2.567 MRSA 1.54 → 0.74 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.538MRSA, 2018: 1.643MRSA, 2019: 0.405MRSA, 2021: 1.069MRSA, 2022: 1.187MRSA, 2023: 0.691MRSA, 2024: 0.738 C. diff 1.09 → 0.28 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.091C. diff, 2018: 0.922C. diff, 2019: 0.902C. diff, 2021: 0.687C. diff, 2022: 0.570C. diff, 2023: 0.340C. diff, 2024: 0.283

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20170.4961.5090.3430.0001.5381.091
20180.3821.1780.6270.0001.6430.922
20190.1671.3190.6800.4740.4050.902
20210.5400.7280.4430.9471.0690.687
20220.5940.6950.9841.6501.1870.570
20230.4260.6710.8460.9620.6910.340
20240.4710.5081.4162.5670.7380.283

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In New Jersey, its score is higher than 78% of the other 60 scored there.

In Lakewood-New Brunswick, NJ area, its score is higher than 100% of the other 14 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 0% (Lakewood-New Brunswick, NJ area) to 32% (Major teaching).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region 436 hospitals28% cut New Jersey: CMS cut 5 of 61 (8%); middle score −0.1613New Jersey 61 hospitals8% cut Lakewood-New Brunswick, NJ area: CMS cut 0 of 15 (0%); middle score −0.2089Lakewood-New Brunswick, NJ area15 hospitals0% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up 365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.2232 This hospital 0.2232 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region436 hospitals28% cut New Jersey: CMS cut 5 of 61 (8%); middle score −0.1613New Jersey61 hospitals8% cut Lakewood-New Brunswick, NJ area: CMS cut 0 of 15 (0%); middle score −0.2089Lakewood-New Brunswick, NJ area15 hospitals0% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.2232 This hospital 0.2232

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045366%
Northeast region43612428%0.047861%
New Jersey6158%−0.161378%
Lakewood-New Brunswick, NJ area1500%−0.2089100%
Major teaching42413632%0.178053%
500 beds and up36510529%0.132358%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013465%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057468%
This hospital0.2232
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut none of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. Overlook Medical Center, Summit: score −0.4445, not cut, 16 miles87. Bayshore Medical Center, Holmdel: score −0.6258, not cut, 14 miles76. University Medical Center of Princeton at Plainsboro, Plainsboro: score −0.3708, not cut, 14 miles65. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital at Rahway, Rahway: score −0.3461, not cut, 12 miles54. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital - Somerset, Somerville: score −0.0900, not cut, 10 miles43. Raritan Bay Medical Center, Perth Amboy: score −0.3256, not cut, 9 miles32. JFK University Medical Center, Edison: score 0.1003, not cut, 7 miles21. Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick: score −0.5369, not cut, 2 miles1This hospital: Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ2−0.5369not cut
JFK University Medical Center, Edison, NJ70.1003not cut
Raritan Bay Medical Center, Perth Amboy, NJ9−0.3256not cut
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital - Somerset, Somerville, NJ10−0.0900not cut
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital at Rahway, Rahway, NJ12−0.3461not cut
University Medical Center of Princeton at Plainsboro, Plainsboro, NJ14−0.3708not cut
Bayshore Medical Center, Holmdel, NJ14−0.6258not cut
Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ16−0.4445not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Saint Peter's University HospitalNew Brunswick, NJ2−0.5369No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
2JFK University Medical CenterEdison, NJ70.1003No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3Raritan Bay Medical CenterPerth Amboy, NJ9−0.3256No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
4Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital - SomersetSomerville, NJ10−0.0900No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital at RahwayRahway, NJ12−0.3461No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
6University Medical Center of Princeton at PlainsboroPlainsboro, NJ14−0.3708No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
7Bayshore Medical CenterHolmdel, NJ14−0.6258No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
8Overlook Medical CenterSummit, NJ16−0.4445No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/310038/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.