P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalKearney Regional Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: +$7K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 280134

1Hospital

Kearney Regional Medical Center

2Location

Kearney, NE (Nebraska’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 68845

Buffalo County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 44 beds · For-profit · Rural

4Care Compare stars

4 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.3568

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $248K, likely $182⁠–⁠309K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3568 for Kearney Regional Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $248K estimate 1% of about $24.8M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.0231 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $182–309K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3568 This hospital 0.3568 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3568 This hospital 0.3568

Higher than 73% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 10 years

  1. 15—
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

In FY2016, CMS reports a payment reduction decision for this hospital but no Total HAC Score.

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.4210, to −0.0642. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 68% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9162

    Z-score−0.5045

    Part of score−0.0841

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 79% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.957

    Z-score0.8136

    Part of score+0.1356

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 96% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.767

    Z-score2.3863

    Part of score+0.3977

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 72% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.159

    Z-score0.5289

    Part of score+0.0882

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 80% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.147

    Z-score−0.8930

    Part of score−0.1488

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 53% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.606

    Z-score−0.1908

    Part of score−0.0318

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.91620.9623−0.5045−0.0841Better than 68% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.9570.5590.8136+0.1356Worse than 79% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI1.7670.4892.3863+0.3977Worse than 96% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.1590.7950.5289+0.0882Worse than 72% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.1470.346−0.8930−0.1488Better than 80% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.6060.641−0.1908−0.0318Better than 53% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.5045PSI 90+0.8136CLABSI+2.3863CAUTI+0.5289SSI−0.8930CDI−0.1908MRSA)÷6measures=0.3568Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0231 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.3568, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5045 divided by 6 = −0.0841PSI 90−0.0841 CLABSI: z‑score 0.8136 divided by 6 = +0.1356CLABSI+0.1356 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 6 = +0.3977CAUTI+0.3977 SSI: z‑score 0.5289 divided by 6 = +0.0882SSI+0.0882 CDI: z‑score −0.8930 divided by 6 = −0.1488CDI−0.1488 MRSA: z‑score −0.1908 divided by 6 = −0.0318MRSA−0.0318 Total HAC Score: 0.3568Score0.3568 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5045 divided by 6 = −0.0841PSI 90−0.0841 CLABSI: z‑score 0.8136 divided by 6 = +0.1356CLABSI+0.1356 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 6 = +0.3977CAUTI+0.3977 SSI: z‑score 0.5289 divided by 6 = +0.0882SSI+0.0882 CDI: z‑score −0.8930 divided by 6 = −0.1488CDI−0.1488 MRSA: z‑score −0.1908 divided by 6 = −0.0318MRSA−0.0318 Total HAC Score: 0.3568Score0.3568 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.5045−0.0841−0.0841
CLABSI0.8136+0.13560.0515
CAUTI2.3863+0.39770.4492
SSI0.5289+0.08820.5374
CDI−0.8930−0.14880.3886
MRSA−0.1908−0.03180.3568
Total HAC Score0.3568
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0231 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.0231 higher, the cut would have been about $248K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $248K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $248K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3568 This hospital 0.3568 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $248K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $248Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3568 This hospital 0.3568

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$248,094
This hospital0.3568$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$248,094

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($24,802,683payment−$41,454readmissions+$48,207value-based)×1%the cut=$248,094at stake

$248,094at stake÷1,467traditional Medicare stays=$169per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $248K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$41K and +$48K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $20,726,773
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $151,720
Outliers: unusually costly stays $1,250,446
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,871,579
Uncompensated care $802,165
Total, before the three programs $24,802,683
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9980 − 1) −$41,454
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0023 − 1) +$48,207
After these two $24,809,436
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $248,094 $0
Net of the three programs likely $5⁠–⁠9K +$6,753

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$20,726,773
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$151,720
Outliers: unusually costly stays$1,250,446
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,871,579
Uncompensated care$802,165
Total, before the three programs$24,802,683
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9980 − 1))−$41,454
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0023 − 1))+$48,207
After these two$24,809,436
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $248,094)$0
Net of the three programs (likely $5–9K)+$6,753

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.3568same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3568 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $248K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 0.9353
CLABSIup to 1.014
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIup to 1.237
CDIup to 0.181
MRSAup to 0.670

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9162 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.957 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 1.767 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.159 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.147 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.606 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.3568 among its measured results: +0.3977.
  • PSI 90 −0.0841
  • CLABSI +0.1356
  • CAUTI +0.3977
  • SSI +0.0882
  • CDI −0.1488
  • MRSA −0.0318

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.5045−0.0841same
CLABSI0.8136+0.1356same
CAUTI2.3863+0.3977same
SSI0.5289+0.0882same
CDI−0.8930−0.1488same
MRSA−0.1908−0.0318same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/280134/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 10 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2017: score 2.0167, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.2833, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.3321, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4538, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1335, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.0122, higher than 51% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5563, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.0142, higher than 50% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.3568, higher than 73% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2017: score 2.0167, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.2833, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.3321, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4538, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1335, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.0122, higher than 51% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5563, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.0142, higher than 50% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.3568, higher than 73% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY2015N/Ano decision
FY2016N/Anot cut, with no score published
FY20172.01677.8%not cut
FY20180.283371.4%not cut
FY2019−0.332129.1%not cut
FY2020−0.453822.1%not cut
FY2021−0.133541.5%not cut
FY2022−0.012251.5%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.556316.4%not cut
FY2025−0.014250.9%not cut
FY20260.356873.7%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 1.71 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 0.000CLABSI, 2022: 0.748CLABSI, 2023: 1.705 CAUTI 1.33 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2021: 1.333CAUTI, 2022: 0.478CAUTI, 2023: 3.320CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 1.25 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 1.366SSI, colon, 2024: 1.248 C. diff 0.62 → 0.25 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.618C. diff, 2018: 1.188C. diff, 2019: 1.084C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.149C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.246 CLABSI 0.00 → 1.71 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 0.000CLABSI, 2022: 0.748CLABSI, 2023: 1.705 CAUTI 1.33 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2021: 1.333CAUTI, 2022: 0.478CAUTI, 2023: 3.320CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 1.25 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 1.366SSI, colon, 2024: 1.248 C. diff 0.62 → 0.25 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.618C. diff, 2018: 1.188C. diff, 2019: 1.084C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.149C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.246

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonC. diff
20170.618
20181.188
20191.084
20210.0001.3330.0000.000
20220.7480.4780.0000.149
20231.7053.3201.3660.000
20240.0001.2480.246

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Nebraska, its score is higher than 73% of the other 23 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Nebraska: CMS cut 6 of 24 (25%); middle score −0.0063Nebraska 24 hospitals25% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.3568 This hospital 0.3568 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Nebraska: CMS cut 6 of 24 (25%); middle score −0.0063Nebraska24 hospitals25% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.3568 This hospital 0.3568

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045373%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026873%
Nebraska24625%−0.006373%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105374%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115471%
For-profit6519815%−0.259084%
Rural61919632%0.022967%
This hospital0.3568
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
25 mi50 mi100 mi8. Faith Health, Norfolk: score 0.8922, cut, 127 miles87. Hays Medical Center, Hays: score −0.4684, not cut, 125 miles76. Columbus Community Hospital, Inc, Columbus: score −0.5728, not cut, 105 miles65. Great Plains Health, North Platte: score −0.1667, not cut, 92 miles54. CHI Health St. Francis, Grand Island: score 0.2624, not cut, 42 miles43. Grand Island Regional Medical Center, Grand Island: score 0.6275, cut, 41 miles32. Mary Lanning Healthcare, Hastings: score 0.2356, not cut, 38 miles21. CHI Health Good Samaritan, Kearney: score −0.5984, not cut, 2 miles1This hospital: Kearney Regional Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
CHI Health Good Samaritan, Kearney, NE2−0.5984not cut
Mary Lanning Healthcare, Hastings, NE380.2356not cut
Grand Island Regional Medical Center, Grand Island, NE410.6275cut
CHI Health St. Francis, Grand Island, NE420.2624not cut
Great Plains Health, North Platte, NE92−0.1667not cut
Columbus Community Hospital, Inc, Columbus, NE105−0.5728not cut
Hays Medical Center, Hays, KS125−0.4684not cut
Faith Health, Norfolk, NE1270.8922cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1CHI Health Good SamaritanKearney, NE2−0.5984No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2Mary Lanning HealthcareHastings, NE380.2356No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Grand Island Regional Medical CenterGrand Island, NE410.62751% cut$98KAbove the national median on 2 of 3 measures
4CHI Health St. FrancisGrand Island, NE420.2624No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5Great Plains HealthNorth Platte, NE92−0.1667No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6Columbus Community Hospital, IncColumbus, NE105−0.5728No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 3 measures
7Hays Medical CenterHays, KS125−0.4684No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8Faith HealthNorfolk, NE1270.89221% cut$248KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Kearney Regional Medical Center, Kearney, NE: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/280134/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.