P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalLee's Summit Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$67K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 260190

1Hospital

Lee's Summit Medical Center

2Location

Lees Summit, MO (Missouri’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 64063

Jackson County

3Type

Minor teaching · 88 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.0577

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $212K, likely $156⁠–⁠264K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0577 for Lee's Summit Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $212K estimate 1% of about $21.2M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.3222 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $156–264K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0577 This hospital 0.0577 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0577 This hospital 0.0577

Higher than 56% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 3 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.3917, to −0.3340. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 61% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9856

    Z-score−0.0197

    Part of score−0.0033

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.834

    Z-score2.2402

    Part of score+0.3734

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 52% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.469

    Z-score−0.1881

    Part of score−0.0313

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 75% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.398

    Z-score−0.7747

    Part of score−0.1291

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 52% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.328

    Z-score−0.1921

    Part of score−0.0320

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 75% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.353

    Z-score−0.7195

    Part of score−0.1199

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.98560.9623−0.0197−0.0033Worse than 61% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.8340.5592.2402+0.3734Worse than 97% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.4690.489−0.1881−0.0313Better than 52% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.3980.795−0.7747−0.1291Better than 75% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.3280.346−0.1921−0.0320Better than 52% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.3530.641−0.7195−0.1199Better than 75% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.0197PSI 90+2.2402CLABSI−0.1881CAUTI−0.7747SSI−0.1921CDI−0.7195MRSA)÷6measures=0.0577Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.3222 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.0577, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.0197 divided by 6 = −0.0033PSI 90−0.0033 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score −0.1881 divided by 6 = −0.0313CAUTI−0.0313 SSI: z‑score −0.7747 divided by 6 = −0.1291SSI−0.1291 CDI: z‑score −0.1921 divided by 6 = −0.0320CDI−0.0320 MRSA: z‑score −0.7195 divided by 6 = −0.1199MRSA−0.1199 Total HAC Score: 0.0577Score0.0577 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.0197 divided by 6 = −0.0033PSI 90−0.0033 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score −0.1881 divided by 6 = −0.0313CAUTI−0.0313 SSI: z‑score −0.7747 divided by 6 = −0.1291SSI−0.1291 CDI: z‑score −0.1921 divided by 6 = −0.0320CDI−0.0320 MRSA: z‑score −0.7195 divided by 6 = −0.1199MRSA−0.1199 Total HAC Score: 0.0577Score0.0577 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.0197−0.0033−0.0033
CLABSI2.2402+0.37340.3701
CAUTI−0.1881−0.03130.3388
SSI−0.7747−0.12910.2097
CDI−0.1921−0.03200.1777
MRSA−0.7195−0.11990.0578
Total HAC Score0.0577
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.3222 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.3222 higher, the cut would have been about $212K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $212K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $212K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0577 This hospital 0.0577 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $212K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $212Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0577 This hospital 0.0577

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$212,260
This hospital0.0577$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$212,260

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($20,061,467payment+$1,231,822teaching, MA stays−$53,301readmissions−$13,948value-based)×1%the cut=$212,260at stake

$212,260at stake÷1,540traditional Medicare stays=$138per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $212K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$53K and −$14K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $16,151,730
Teaching (indirect medical education) $953,760
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $1,231,822
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $114,031
Outliers: unusually costly stays $132,444
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,321,139
Uncompensated care $1,388,363
Total, before the three programs $21,293,289
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9967 − 1) −$53,301
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9991 − 1) −$13,948
After these two $21,226,040
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $212,260 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$86K to −$49K −$67,249

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$16,151,730
Teaching (indirect medical education)$953,760
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$1,231,822
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$114,031
Outliers: unusually costly stays$132,444
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,321,139
Uncompensated care$1,388,363
Total, before the three programs$21,293,289
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9967 − 1))−$53,301
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9991 − 1))−$13,948
After these two$21,226,040
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $212,260)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$86K to −$49K)−$67,249

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.0577same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0577 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $212K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.2618
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIup to 1.269
SSIup to 1.524
CDIup to 0.826
MRSAup to 1.275

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9856 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.834 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.469 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.398 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.328 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.353 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.0577 among its measured results: +0.3734.
  • PSI 90 −0.0033
  • CLABSI +0.3734
  • CAUTI −0.0313
  • SSI −0.1291
  • CDI −0.0320
  • MRSA −0.1199

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.0197−0.0033same
CLABSI2.2402+0.3734same
CAUTI−0.1881−0.0313same
SSI−0.7747−0.1291same
CDI−0.1921−0.0320same
MRSA−0.7195−0.1199same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/260190/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 3 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.9000, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.0600, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1346, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.3221, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.9813, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.9154, higher than 94% of scores; cutFY2022: score −0.0615, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.0663, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.1883, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0577, higher than 56% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.9000, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.0600, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1346, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.3221, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.9813, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.9154, higher than 94% of scores; cutFY2022: score −0.0615, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.0663, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.1883, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0577, higher than 56% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.900087.9%cut
FY20166.000056.2%not cut
FY20175.060043.3%not cut
FY2018−0.134641.1%not cut
FY2019−0.322129.8%not cut
FY20200.981395.6%cut
FY20210.915494.6%cut
FY2022−0.061547.9%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.066347.6%not cut
FY20250.188364.8%not cut
FY20260.057756.4%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 1.80 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 1.832CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 0.486CLABSI, 2022: 0.496CLABSI, 2023: 1.858CLABSI, 2024: 1.804 CAUTI 1.19 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.194CAUTI, 2018: 0.559CAUTI, 2019: 1.034CAUTI, 2021: 0.880CAUTI, 2022: 0.463CAUTI, 2023: 0.944CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.29 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2018: 0.908SSI, colon, 2019: 1.207SSI, colon, 2021: 0.494SSI, colon, 2022: 0.912SSI, colon, 2023: 0.504SSI, colon, 2024: 0.286 MRSA 0.91 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2021: 0.906MRSA, 2022: 0.814MRSA, 2023: 0.601MRSA, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 1.53 → 0.26 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.533C. diff, 2018: 1.103C. diff, 2019: 0.669C. diff, 2021: 0.449C. diff, 2022: 0.804C. diff, 2023: 0.405C. diff, 2024: 0.261 CLABSI 0.00 → 1.80 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 1.832CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 0.486CLABSI, 2022: 0.496CLABSI, 2023: 1.858CLABSI, 2024: 1.804 CAUTI 1.19 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.194CAUTI, 2018: 0.559CAUTI, 2019: 1.034CAUTI, 2021: 0.880CAUTI, 2022: 0.463CAUTI, 2023: 0.944CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.29 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2018: 0.908SSI, colon, 2019: 1.207SSI, colon, 2021: 0.494SSI, colon, 2022: 0.912SSI, colon, 2023: 0.504SSI, colon, 2024: 0.286 MRSA 0.91 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2021: 0.906MRSA, 2022: 0.814MRSA, 2023: 0.601MRSA, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 1.53 → 0.26 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.533C. diff, 2018: 1.103C. diff, 2019: 0.669C. diff, 2021: 0.449C. diff, 2022: 0.804C. diff, 2023: 0.405C. diff, 2024: 0.261

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.0001.1940.0001.533
20181.8320.5590.9081.103
20190.0001.0341.2070.669
20210.4860.8800.4940.9060.449
20220.4960.4630.9120.8140.804
20231.8580.9440.5040.6010.405
20241.8040.0000.2860.0000.261

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Missouri, its score is higher than 55% of the other 61 scored there.

In Kansas City, MO-KS area, its score is higher than 62% of the other 27 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (Missouri) to 28% (Fewer than 100 beds).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Missouri: CMS cut 9 of 62 (15%); middle score 0.0016Missouri 62 hospitals15% cut Kansas City, MO-KS area: CMS cut 6 of 28 (21%); middle score −0.1180Kansas City, MO-KS area 28 hospitals21% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.0577 This hospital 0.0577 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Missouri: CMS cut 9 of 62 (15%); middle score 0.0016Missouri62 hospitals15% cut Kansas City, MO-KS area: CMS cut 6 of 28 (21%); middle score −0.1180Kansas City, MO-KS area28 hospitals21% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.0577 This hospital 0.0577

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045356%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026855%
Missouri62915%0.001655%
Kansas City, MO-KS area28621%−0.118062%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056757%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115459%
For-profit6519815%−0.259069%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057457%
This hospital0.0577
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut none of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 3 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. Kansas City Orthopaedic Institute, Leawood: score −1.0172, not cut, 16 miles87. St Joseph Medical Center, Kansas City: score −0.3710, not cut, 15 miles76. Research Medical Center, Kansas City: score 0.3114, not cut, 14 miles65. Belton Regional Medical Center, Belton: score 0.2353, not cut, 11 miles54. Centerpoint Medical Center, Independence: score −0.4546, not cut, 10 miles43. St Mary's Medical Center, Blue Springs: score −0.5251, not cut, 9 miles32. University Health Lakewood Medical Center, Kansas City: score −0.2779, not cut, 5 miles21. Saint Luke's East Hospital, Lees Summit: score −0.0568, not cut, 3 miles1This hospital: Lee's Summit Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Saint Luke's East Hospital, Lees Summit, MO3−0.0568not cut
University Health Lakewood Medical Center, Kansas City, MO5−0.2779not cut
St Mary's Medical Center, Blue Springs, MO9−0.5251not cut
Centerpoint Medical Center, Independence, MO10−0.4546not cut
Belton Regional Medical Center, Belton, MO110.2353not cut
Research Medical Center, Kansas City, MO140.3114not cut
St Joseph Medical Center, Kansas City, MO15−0.3710not cut
Kansas City Orthopaedic Institute, Leawood, KS16−1.0172not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Saint Luke's East HospitalLees Summit, MO3−0.0568No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2University Health Lakewood Medical CenterKansas City, MO5−0.2779No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
3St Mary's Medical CenterBlue Springs, MO9−0.5251No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 4 measures
4Centerpoint Medical CenterIndependence, MO10−0.4546No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5Belton Regional Medical CenterBelton, MO110.2353No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
6Research Medical CenterKansas City, MO140.3114No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7St Joseph Medical CenterKansas City, MO15−0.3710No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Kansas City Orthopaedic InstituteLeawood, KS16−1.0172No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Lee's Summit Medical Center, Lees Summit, MO: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/260190/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.