P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalBaptist Memorial Hospital Desoto Estimated FY2026 net: −$1.5M×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 250141

1Hospital

Baptist Memorial Hospital Desoto

2Location

Southaven, MS (Mississippi’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 38671

DeSoto County

3Type

Minor teaching · 131 beds · For-profit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
CMS footnote 23: The data are based on claims that the hospital or facility submitted to CMS. The hospital or facility has reported discrepancies in their claims data.
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.5171

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$640K estimate
Likely $487⁠–⁠804K; about $134 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$640K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.5171 for Baptist Memorial Hospital Desoto and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $64.0M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $134 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $487–804K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.5171 This hospital 0.5171 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.5171 This hospital 0.5171

Higher than 81% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 9 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

CMS’s note on the score: The data are based on claims that the hospital or facility submitted to CMS. The hospital or facility has reported discrepancies in their claims data.

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.4490, to 0.0681. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    CMS footnote 23: The data are based on claims that the hospital or facility submitted to CMS. The hospital or facility has reported discrepancies in their claims data.

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.4707

    Z-score2.5111

    Part of score+0.4185

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 64% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.715

    Z-score0.2522

    Part of score+0.0420

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 54% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.544

    Z-score−0.0073

    Part of score−0.0012

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 78% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.299

    Z-score0.7687

    Part of score+0.1281

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 50% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.340

    Z-score−0.1457

    Part of score−0.0243

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 57% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.565

    Z-score−0.2765

    Part of score−0.0461

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.47070.96232.5111+0.4185Worse than 97% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.7150.5590.2522+0.0420Worse than 64% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.5440.489−0.0073−0.0012Worse than 54% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.2990.7950.7687+0.1281Worse than 78% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.3400.346−0.1457−0.0243Better than 50% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.5650.641−0.2765−0.0461Better than 57% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(2.5111PSI 90+0.2522CLABSI−0.0073CAUTI+0.7687SSI−0.1457CDI−0.2765MRSA)÷6measures=0.5171Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.1379 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.5171, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.2522 divided by 6 = +0.0420CLABSI+0.0420 CAUTI: z‑score −0.0073 divided by 6 = −0.0012CAUTI−0.0012 SSI: z‑score 0.7687 divided by 6 = +0.1281SSI+0.1281 CDI: z‑score −0.1457 divided by 6 = −0.0243CDI−0.0243 MRSA: z‑score −0.2765 divided by 6 = −0.0461MRSA−0.0461 Total HAC Score: 0.5171Score0.5171 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.40.50.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.2522 divided by 6 = +0.0420CLABSI+0.0420 CAUTI: z‑score −0.0073 divided by 6 = −0.0012CAUTI−0.0012 SSI: z‑score 0.7687 divided by 6 = +0.1281SSI+0.1281 CDI: z‑score −0.1457 divided by 6 = −0.0243CDI−0.0243 MRSA: z‑score −0.2765 divided by 6 = −0.0461MRSA−0.0461 Total HAC Score: 0.5171Score0.5171 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.40.50.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 902.5111+0.41850.4185
CLABSI0.2522+0.04200.4605
CAUTI−0.0073−0.00120.4593
SSI0.7687+0.12810.5874
CDI−0.1457−0.02430.5631
MRSA−0.2765−0.04610.5170
Total HAC Score0.5171
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1379 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $640K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $640K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $640K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.5171 This hospital 0.5171 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $640K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $640Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.5171 This hospital 0.5171

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$639,817
This hospital0.5171−$639,817
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$639,817

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($63,002,503payment+$1,817,081teaching, MA stays−$381,836readmissions−$456,034value-based)×1%the cut=$639,817HAC cut

$639,817HAC cut÷4,777traditional Medicare stays=$134per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $640K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$382K and −$456K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $49,589,129
Teaching (indirect medical education) $2,178,946
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $1,817,081
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,252,621
Outliers: unusually costly stays $718,051
Capital: buildings and equipment $4,134,526
Uncompensated care $5,129,230
Total, before the three programs $64,819,584
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9923 − 1) −$381,836
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9908 − 1) −$456,034
After these two $63,981,714
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $487⁠–⁠804K −$639,817
Net of the three programs likely −$1.7M to −$1.2M −$1,477,687

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$49,589,129
Teaching (indirect medical education)$2,178,946
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$1,817,081
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,252,621
Outliers: unusually costly stays$718,051
Capital: buildings and equipment$4,134,526
Uncompensated care$5,129,230
Total, before the three programs$64,819,584
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9923 − 1))−$381,836
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9908 − 1))−$456,034
After these two$63,981,714
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $487–804K)−$639,817
Net of the three programs (likely −$1.7M to −$1.2M)−$1,477,687

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.5171same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$640Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.5171 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $640K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 901.2295 or lower
CLABSI0.358 or lower
CAUTI0.200 or lower
SSI0.815 or lower
CDI0.126 or lower
MRSA0.169 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.4707 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.715 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.544 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.299 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.340 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.565 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.5171 among its measured results: +0.4185.
  • PSI 90 +0.4185
  • CLABSI +0.0420
  • CAUTI −0.0012
  • SSI +0.1281
  • CDI −0.0243
  • MRSA −0.0461

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 902.5111+0.4185same
CLABSI0.2522+0.0420same
CAUTI−0.0073−0.0012same
SSI0.7687+0.1281same
CDI−0.1457−0.0243same
MRSA−0.2765−0.0461same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/250141/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 8 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 9 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 9.3500, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.7500, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.0200, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.7139, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2019: score 1.3296, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2020: score 1.4042, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2021: score 1.6159, higher than 99% of scores; cutFY2022: score 1.2734, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.1293, higher than 61% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.3472, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.5171, higher than 81% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 9.3500, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.7500, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.0200, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.7139, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2019: score 1.3296, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2020: score 1.4042, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2021: score 1.6159, higher than 99% of scores; cutFY2022: score 1.2734, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.1293, higher than 61% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.3472, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.5171, higher than 81% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20159.350098.2%cut
FY20167.750086.8%cut
FY20177.020083.4%cut
FY20180.713988.5%cut
FY20191.329696.6%cut
FY20201.404298.8%cut
FY20211.615999.3%cut
FY20221.273497.9%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.129361.7%not cut
FY20250.347274.1%not cut
FY20260.517181.0%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 5 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 2.22 → 0.56 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.217CLABSI, 2018: 1.302CLABSI, 2019: 2.217CLABSI, 2021: 2.803CLABSI, 2022: 0.724CLABSI, 2023: 0.994CLABSI, 2024: 0.559 CAUTI 1.26 → 0.48 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.262CAUTI, 2018: 0.659CAUTI, 2019: 0.663CAUTI, 2021: 1.689CAUTI, 2022: 0.488CAUTI, 2023: 0.660CAUTI, 2024: 0.480 SSI, colon 1.07 → 0.92 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.072SSI, colon, 2018: 1.631SSI, colon, 2019: 1.519SSI, colon, 2021: 1.351SSI, colon, 2022: 1.377SSI, colon, 2023: 1.517SSI, colon, 2024: 0.917 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 1.59 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.666SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.417SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.590 MRSA 1.66 → 0.84 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.657MRSA, 2018: 2.439MRSA, 2019: 1.634MRSA, 2021: 2.032MRSA, 2022: 0.906MRSA, 2023: 0.191MRSA, 2024: 0.838 C. diff 1.09 → 0.39 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.087C. diff, 2018: 1.321C. diff, 2019: 1.126C. diff, 2021: 0.586C. diff, 2022: 0.229C. diff, 2023: 0.294C. diff, 2024: 0.385 CLABSI 2.22 → 0.56 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.217CLABSI, 2018: 1.302CLABSI, 2019: 2.217CLABSI, 2021: 2.803CLABSI, 2022: 0.724CLABSI, 2023: 0.994CLABSI, 2024: 0.559 CAUTI 1.26 → 0.48 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.262CAUTI, 2018: 0.659CAUTI, 2019: 0.663CAUTI, 2021: 1.689CAUTI, 2022: 0.488CAUTI, 2023: 0.660CAUTI, 2024: 0.480 SSI, colon 1.07 → 0.92 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.072SSI, colon, 2018: 1.631SSI, colon, 2019: 1.519SSI, colon, 2021: 1.351SSI, colon, 2022: 1.377SSI, colon, 2023: 1.517SSI, colon, 2024: 0.917 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 1.59 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.666SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.417SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.590 MRSA 1.66 → 0.84 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.657MRSA, 2018: 2.439MRSA, 2019: 1.634MRSA, 2021: 2.032MRSA, 2022: 0.906MRSA, 2023: 0.191MRSA, 2024: 0.838 C. diff 1.09 → 0.39 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.087C. diff, 2018: 1.321C. diff, 2019: 1.126C. diff, 2021: 0.586C. diff, 2022: 0.229C. diff, 2023: 0.294C. diff, 2024: 0.385

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20172.2171.2621.0720.0001.6571.087
20181.3020.6591.6310.6662.4391.321
20192.2170.6631.5191.4171.6341.126
20212.8031.6891.3511.5902.0320.586
20220.7240.4881.3770.9060.229
20230.9940.6601.5170.1910.294
20240.5590.4800.9170.8380.385

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Mississippi, its score is higher than 69% of the other 49 scored there.

In Memphis, TN-MS-AR area, its score is higher than 71% of the other 7 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 38% (Memphis, TN-MS-AR area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Mississippi: CMS cut 18 of 50 (36%); middle score 0.1923Mississippi 50 hospitals36% cut Memphis, TN-MS-AR area: CMS cut 3 of 8 (38%); middle score 0.0915Memphis, TN-MS-AR area 8 hospitals38% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.5171 This hospital 0.5171 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Mississippi: CMS cut 18 of 50 (36%); middle score 0.1923Mississippi50 hospitals36% cut Memphis, TN-MS-AR area: CMS cut 3 of 8 (38%); middle score 0.0915Memphis, TN-MS-AR area8 hospitals38% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.5171 This hospital 0.5171

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045381%
South region1,17426322%−0.105682%
Mississippi501836%0.192369%
Memphis, TN-MS-AR area8338%0.091571%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056785%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073283%
For-profit6519815%−0.259088%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057483%
This hospital0.5171
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 8 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Baptist Memorial Hospital Tipton, Covington: score −1.4622, not cut, 43 miles87. Saint Francis Bartlett Medical Center, Bartlett: score 0.6053, cut, 20 miles76. Baptist Memorial Hospital, Memphis: score 0.5660, cut, 13 miles65. Regional One Health, Memphis: score 0.1505, not cut, 12 miles54. St Francis Hospital, Memphis: score 0.0324, not cut, 12 miles43. Methodist Hospitals of Memphis, Memphis: score −0.1512, not cut, 11 miles32. Methodist Healthcare - Olive Branch Hospital, Olive Branch: score −0.9232, not cut, 11 miles21. Delta Specialty Hospital, Memphis: score −1.4622, not cut, 8 miles1This hospital: Baptist Memorial Hospital Desoto

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Delta Specialty Hospital, Memphis, TN8−1.4622not cut
Methodist Healthcare - Olive Branch Hospital, Olive Branch, MS11−0.9232not cut
Methodist Hospitals of Memphis, Memphis, TN11−0.1512not cut
St Francis Hospital, Memphis, TN120.0324not cut
Regional One Health, Memphis, TN120.1505not cut
Baptist Memorial Hospital, Memphis, TN130.5660cut
Saint Francis Bartlett Medical Center, Bartlett, TN200.6053cut
Baptist Memorial Hospital Tipton, Covington, TN43−1.4622not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Delta Specialty HospitalMemphis, TN8−1.4622No cutno estimateAbove the national median on 0 of 1 measures
2Methodist Healthcare - Olive Branch HospitalOlive Branch, MS11−0.9232No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures
3Methodist Hospitals of MemphisMemphis, TN11−0.1512No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
4St Francis HospitalMemphis, TN120.0324No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5Regional One HealthMemphis, TN120.1505No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
6Baptist Memorial HospitalMemphis, TN130.56601% cut$1.8MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7Saint Francis Bartlett Medical CenterBartlett, TN200.60531% cut$219KAbove the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Baptist Memorial Hospital TiptonCovington, TN43−1.4622No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

23
The data are based on claims that the hospital or facility submitted to CMS. The hospital or facility has reported discrepancies in their claims data.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Baptist Memorial Hospital Desoto, Southaven, MS: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/250141/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.