P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalAnderson Regional Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$596K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 250104

1Hospital

Anderson Regional Medical Center

2Location

Meridian, MS (Mississippi’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 39301

Lauderdale County

3Type

Minor teaching · 260 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.9050

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$308K estimate
Likely $234⁠–⁠387K; about $123 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$308K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.9050 for Anderson Regional Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $30.8M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $123 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $234–387K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.9050 This hospital 0.9050 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.9050 This hospital 0.9050

Higher than 92% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 4 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.3917, to 0.5133. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 63% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9919

    Z-score0.0242

    Part of score+0.0040

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 98% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value2.119

    Z-score2.2402

    Part of score+0.3734

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 67% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.658

    Z-score0.2675

    Part of score+0.0446

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 58% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.677

    Z-score−0.2968

    Part of score−0.0495

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 88% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.729

    Z-score1.3606

    Part of score+0.2268

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 92% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.575

    Z-score1.8343

    Part of score+0.3057

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.99190.96230.0242+0.0040Worse than 63% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI2.1190.5592.2402+0.3734Worse than 98% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.6580.4890.2675+0.0446Worse than 67% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.6770.795−0.2968−0.0495Better than 58% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.7290.3461.3606+0.2268Worse than 88% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.5750.6411.8343+0.3057Worse than 92% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.0242PSI 90+2.2402CLABSI+0.2675CAUTI−0.2968SSI+1.3606CDI+1.8343MRSA)÷6measures=0.9050Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.5258 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.9050, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.0242 divided by 6 = +0.0040PSI 90+0.0040 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2675 divided by 6 = +0.0446CAUTI+0.0446 SSI: z‑score −0.2968 divided by 6 = −0.0495SSI−0.0495 CDI: z‑score 1.3606 divided by 6 = +0.2268CDI+0.2268 MRSA: z‑score 1.8343 divided by 6 = +0.3057MRSA+0.3057 Total HAC Score: 0.9050Score0.9050 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.0242 divided by 6 = +0.0040PSI 90+0.0040 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2675 divided by 6 = +0.0446CAUTI+0.0446 SSI: z‑score −0.2968 divided by 6 = −0.0495SSI−0.0495 CDI: z‑score 1.3606 divided by 6 = +0.2268CDI+0.2268 MRSA: z‑score 1.8343 divided by 6 = +0.3057MRSA+0.3057 Total HAC Score: 0.9050Score0.9050 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.0242+0.00400.0040
CLABSI2.2402+0.37340.3774
CAUTI0.2675+0.04460.4220
SSI−0.2968−0.04950.3725
CDI1.3606+0.22680.5993
MRSA1.8343+0.30570.9050
Total HAC Score0.9050
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.5258 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $308K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $308K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $308K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.9050 This hospital 0.9050 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $308K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $308Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.9050 This hospital 0.9050

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$307,628
This hospital0.9050−$307,628
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$307,628

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($31,051,159payment−$152,163readmissions−$136,221value-based)×1%the cut=$307,628HAC cut

$307,628HAC cut÷2,494traditional Medicare stays=$123per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $308K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$152K and −$136K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $24,944,818
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $827,669
Outliers: unusually costly stays $470,210
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,908,326
Uncompensated care $2,900,136
Total, before the three programs $31,051,159
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9939 − 1) −$152,163
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9945 − 1) −$136,221
After these two $30,762,775
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $234⁠–⁠387K −$307,628
Net of the three programs likely −$701K to −$480K −$596,012

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$24,944,818
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$827,669
Outliers: unusually costly stays$470,210
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,908,326
Uncompensated care$2,900,136
Total, before the three programs$31,051,159
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9939 − 1))−$152,163
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9945 − 1))−$136,221
After these two$30,762,775
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $234–387K)−$307,628
Net of the three programs (likely −$701K to −$480K)−$596,012

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.9050same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$308Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.9050 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $308K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSI0.212 or lower
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSA0.065 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9919 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 2.119 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.658 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.677 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.729 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.575 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.9050 among its measured results: +0.3734.
  • PSI 90 +0.0040
  • CLABSI +0.3734
  • CAUTI +0.0446
  • SSI −0.0495
  • CDI +0.2268
  • MRSA +0.3057

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.0242+0.0040same
CLABSI2.2402+0.3734same
CAUTI0.2675+0.0446same
SSI−0.2968−0.0495same
CDI1.3606+0.2268same
MRSA1.8343+0.3057same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 4 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.6000, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.2500, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.8900, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.2534, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.5116, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.2581, higher than 70% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2209, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.3091, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.8671, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.7860, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.9050, higher than 92% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.6000, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.2500, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.8900, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.2534, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.5116, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.2581, higher than 70% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2209, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.3091, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.8671, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.7860, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.9050, higher than 92% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.600034.7%not cut
FY20166.250064.4%not cut
FY20174.890039.6%not cut
FY20180.253469.8%not cut
FY20190.511681.9%cut
FY20200.258170.8%not cut
FY2021−0.220935.8%not cut
FY2022−0.309130.6%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.867190.6%cut
FY20250.786090.1%cut
FY20260.905092.2%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.87 → 0.86 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.868CLABSI, 2018: 0.304CLABSI, 2019: 0.315CLABSI, 2021: 2.880CLABSI, 2022: 2.789CLABSI, 2023: 3.334CLABSI, 2024: 0.862 CAUTI 0.70 → 0.50 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.696CAUTI, 2018: 0.717CAUTI, 2019: 0.428CAUTI, 2021: 0.681CAUTI, 2022: 0.337CAUTI, 2023: 0.812CAUTI, 2024: 0.500 SSI, colon 0.84 → 0.45 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.841SSI, colon, 2018: 0.841SSI, colon, 2019: 0.732SSI, colon, 2021: 0.689SSI, colon, 2022: 0.989SSI, colon, 2023: 0.354SSI, colon, 2024: 0.452 MRSA 1.83 → 0.93 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.829MRSA, 2018: 0.857MRSA, 2019: 0.889MRSA, 2021: 2.407MRSA, 2022: 2.524MRSA, 2023: 2.245MRSA, 2024: 0.928 C. diff 0.42 → 0.77 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.423C. diff, 2018: 0.958C. diff, 2019: 0.667C. diff, 2021: 0.548C. diff, 2022: 1.040C. diff, 2023: 0.686C. diff, 2024: 0.774 CLABSI 0.87 → 0.86 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.868CLABSI, 2018: 0.304CLABSI, 2019: 0.315CLABSI, 2021: 2.880CLABSI, 2022: 2.789CLABSI, 2023: 3.334CLABSI, 2024: 0.862 CAUTI 0.70 → 0.50 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.696CAUTI, 2018: 0.717CAUTI, 2019: 0.428CAUTI, 2021: 0.681CAUTI, 2022: 0.337CAUTI, 2023: 0.812CAUTI, 2024: 0.500 SSI, colon 0.84 → 0.45 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.841SSI, colon, 2018: 0.841SSI, colon, 2019: 0.732SSI, colon, 2021: 0.689SSI, colon, 2022: 0.989SSI, colon, 2023: 0.354SSI, colon, 2024: 0.452 MRSA 1.83 → 0.93 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.829MRSA, 2018: 0.857MRSA, 2019: 0.889MRSA, 2021: 2.407MRSA, 2022: 2.524MRSA, 2023: 2.245MRSA, 2024: 0.928 C. diff 0.42 → 0.77 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.423C. diff, 2018: 0.958C. diff, 2019: 0.667C. diff, 2021: 0.548C. diff, 2022: 1.040C. diff, 2023: 0.686C. diff, 2024: 0.774

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.8680.6960.8411.8290.423
20180.3040.7170.8410.8570.958
20190.3150.4280.7320.8890.667
20212.8800.6810.6892.4070.548
20222.7890.3370.9892.5241.040
20233.3340.8120.3542.2450.686
20240.8620.5000.4520.9280.774

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Mississippi, its score is higher than 81% of the other 49 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 36% (Mississippi).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Mississippi: CMS cut 18 of 50 (36%); middle score 0.1923Mississippi 50 hospitals36% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.9050 This hospital 0.9050 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Mississippi: CMS cut 18 of 50 (36%); middle score 0.1923Mississippi50 hospitals36% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.9050 This hospital 0.9050

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045392%
South region1,17426322%−0.105692%
Mississippi501836%0.192381%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056796%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073294%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013492%
Rural61919632%0.022985%
This hospital0.9050
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 4 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is less than a mile away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Winston Medical Center, Louisville: score 1.3838, cut, 56 miles87. South Central Reg Med Ctr, Laurel: score 0.7563, cut, 54 miles76. Wayne General Hospital, Waynesboro: score 1.2130, cut, 48 miles65. Whitfield Regional Hospital, Demopolis: score 1.0283, cut, 47 miles54. Hill Hospital of Sumter County, York: score 0.3548, not cut, 25 miles43. Alliance Health Center, Meridian: score −1.4597, not cut, 9 miles32. Anderson Regional Medical Center South Campus, Meridian: score −1.4622, not cut, less than a mile21. Ochsner Rush Hospital, Meridian: score −0.2519, not cut, less than a mile1This hospital: Anderson Regional Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Ochsner Rush Hospital, Meridian, MSunder 1−0.2519not cut
Anderson Regional Medical Center South Campus, Meridian, MSunder 1−1.4622not cut
Alliance Health Center, Meridian, MS9−1.4597not cut
Hill Hospital of Sumter County, York, AL250.3548not cut
Whitfield Regional Hospital, Demopolis, AL471.0283cut
Wayne General Hospital, Waynesboro, MS481.2130cut
South Central Reg Med Ctr, Laurel, MS540.7563cut
Winston Medical Center, Louisville, MS561.3838cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Ochsner Rush HospitalMeridian, MSunder 1−0.2519No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2Anderson Regional Medical Center South CampusMeridian, MSunder 1−1.4622No cutno estimateAbove the national median on 0 of 1 measures
3Alliance Health CenterMeridian, MS9−1.4597No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures
4Hill Hospital of Sumter CountyYork, AL250.3548No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
5Whitfield Regional HospitalDemopolis, AL471.02831% cut$42KAbove the national median on 3 of 5 measures
6Wayne General HospitalWaynesboro, MS481.21301% cut$31KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7South Central Reg Med CtrLaurel, MS540.75631% cut$153KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
8Winston Medical CenterLouisville, MS561.38381% cut$14KAbove the national median on 1 of 1 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Anderson Regional Medical Center, Meridian, MS: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/250104/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.