Hospital record · FY2026CCN 250096

1Hospital

Crossgates River Oaks Hospital

2Location

Brandon, MS (Mississippi’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 39042

Rankin County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 134 beds · For-profit · Urban · Medicare-dependent hospital

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.1138

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut

CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

A cut would have been $48K, likely $34⁠–⁠54K estimate

No cut

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.1138 for Crossgates River Oaks Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $48K estimate 1% of about $4.8M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.2661 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $34–54K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

Higher than 59% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

15Cut
16No
17No
18No
19No
20No
21Cut
22No
23—
24No
25No
26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 3 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.3150, to −0.2012. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 3 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; CAUTI added the most to its score.

This hospital
National median
Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap

PSI 90 (what it counts)
Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.
Patient safety and adverse events composite
Better than 71% of the other 2,808 hospitals
estimate

This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

CMS value0.9052

Z-score−0.5812

Part of score−0.1937
CLABSI (what it counts)
Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.
Central line–associated bloodstream infections
Not scored on this measure
CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

CMS valueno value published

Z-scoreno value published

Part of scoreno value published
CAUTI (what it counts)
Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.
added the most
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections
Worse than 81% of the other 2,354 hospitals

CMS value0.881

Z-score0.8050

Part of score+0.2683
SSI (what it counts)
Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.
Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy
Not scored on this measure
CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

CMS valueno value published

Z-scoreno value published

Part of scoreno value published
CDI (what it counts)
C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.
Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections
Worse than 59% of the other 2,766 hospitals
estimate

This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

CMS value0.408

Z-score0.1176

Part of score+0.0392
MRSA (what it counts)
Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.
MRSA bloodstream infections
Not scored on this measure
CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

CMS valueno value published

Z-scoreno value published

Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table

Measure	CMS value	National median	Z-score	Part of the score	Among hospitals
PSI 90	0.9052	0.9623	−0.5812	−0.1937	Better than 71% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI	no value published	0.559	no value published	no value published	Not scored on this measure
CAUTI	0.881	0.489	0.8050	+0.2683	Worse than 81% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI	no value published	0.795	no value published	no value published	Not scored on this measure
CDI	0.408	0.346	0.1176	+0.0392	Worse than 59% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA	no value published	0.641	no value published	no value published	Not scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 3; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.5812PSI 90+0.8050CAUTI+0.1176CDI)÷3measures=0.1138Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2661 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.1138, below CMS’s line.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table

Measure	Z-score	Part of the score	Running total
PSI 90	−0.5812	−0.1937	−0.1937
CAUTI	0.8050	+0.2683	0.0746
CDI	0.1176	+0.0392	0.1138
Total HAC Score			0.1138
CMS’s line		0.3792	0.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2661 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.2661 higher, the cut would have been about $48K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table

Score	Total HAC Score	Estimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.3792	0.3792	$0
Any score from 0.3799	0.3799	−$47,791
This hospital	0.1138	$0
CMS’s highest score	2.3133	−$47,791

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($4,790,878payment−$11,791readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$47,791at stake

$47,791at stake÷383traditional Medicare stays=$125per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $48K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$12K and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates	$3,272,289
Medicare-dependent hospital add-on	$531,190
Base payment the base	$3,803,479
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)	$55,793
Outliers: unusually costly stays	$88,679
Capital: buildings and equipment	$264,442
Uncompensated care	$578,485
Total, before the three programs	$4,790,878
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9969 − 1)	−$11,791
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment	$0
After these two	$4,779,087
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $47,791	$0
Net of the three programs likely −$12K to −$8K	−$11,791

Not paid to this hospital: teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Show table

Line	Amount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates	$3,272,289
Medicare-dependent hospital add-on	$531,190
Base payment (the base)	$3,803,479
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)	$55,793
Outliers: unusually costly stays	$88,679
Capital: buildings and equipment	$264,442
Uncompensated care	$578,485
Total, before the three programs	$4,790,878
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9969 − 1))	−$11,791
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)	$0
After these two	$4,779,087
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $47,791)	$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$12K to −$8K)	−$11,791

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table

	CMS reports	Hypothetical
Total HAC Score	0.1138	same
Payment reduction decision	No	same
Payment cut	0%	same
Estimated HAC cut estimate	$0	same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.1138 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $48K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

Measure	Highest value that keeps No
PSI 90	up to 1.0191
CAUTI	up to 1.211
CDI	up to 0.613

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 3 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

Patient safety and adverse events composite PSI 90

PSI 90 value

CMS 0.9052 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.2327

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections CAUTI

CAUTI value

CMS 0.881 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0804

Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections CDI

CDI value

CMS 0.408 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.1291

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Optional: your NHSN predicted infections for CAUTI, January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024

Optional: your NHSN predicted infections for CDI, January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.1138 among its measured results: +0.2683.

PSI 90 −0.1937
CAUTI +0.2683
CDI +0.0392

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 3, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table

Measure	Z-score	Part of the score	Hypothetical
PSI 90	−0.5812	−0.1937	same
CAUTI	0.8050	+0.2683	same
CDI	0.1176	+0.0392	same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/250096/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table

Fiscal year	Total HAC Score	Higher than this share of scores	Payment reduction
FY2015	7.0750	79.5%	cut
FY2016	6.7500	72.4%	not cut
FY2017	3.4125	18.5%	not cut
FY2018	−0.3675	27.1%	not cut
FY2019	0.2502	69.8%	not cut
FY2020	−0.1771	38.6%	not cut
FY2021	0.5023	82.9%	cut
FY2022	−0.3244	29.3%	not cut
FY2023			no decision
FY2024	0.3259	72.3%	not cut
FY2025	0.0457	55.8%	not cut
FY2026	0.1138	59.9%	not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 2 infection measures ended lower than they started.

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table

Calendar year	CAUTI	C. diff
2017		1.005
2018		0.896
2019		0.588
2021	0.000	0.000
2022	0.000	1.380
2023		0.597
2024

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Mississippi, its score is higher than 44% of the other 49 scored there.

In Jackson, MS area, its score is higher than 37% of the other 8 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 6 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 36% (Mississippi).

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table

Group	With a decision	Hospitals cut	Share cut	Middle score	Hospital higher than
All hospitals	2,886	718	25%	−0.0453	59%
South region	1,174	263	22%	−0.1056	63%
Mississippi	50	18	36%	0.1923	44%
Jackson, MS area	9	3	33%	0.1369	37%
Not teaching	1,563	389	25%	−0.1053	62%
100 to 299 beds	1,193	275	23%	−0.0732	61%
For-profit	651	98	15%	−0.2590	72%
Urban	2,241	510	23%	−0.0574	61%
This hospital				0.1138
CMS’s line				0.3792	0.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 5 miles away.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table

Hospital	Miles	Score	Decision
Merit Health River Oaks, Flowood, MS	5	0.1369	not cut
Merit Health Women's Hospital, Flowood, MS	5	−0.9731	not cut
St Dominic-Jackson Memorial Hospital, Jackson, MS	8	0.2219	not cut
Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, Jackson, MS	9	1.0526	cut
University of Mississippi Med Center, Jackson, MS	9	0.6118	cut
Merit Health Central, Jackson, MS	13	−0.4157	not cut
Merit Health Madison, Canton, MS	21	−0.8557	not cut
Magee General Hospital, Magee, MS	34	1.1360	cut

#	Hospital	Miles	Score	Decision	Est. cut ($, modeled)	Measures
1	Merit Health River OaksFlowood, MS	5	0.1369	No cut	$0	Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2	Merit Health Women's HospitalFlowood, MS	5	−0.9731	No cut	$0	Above the national median on 1 of 3 measures
3	St Dominic-Jackson Memorial HospitalJackson, MS	8	0.2219	No cut	$0	Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4	Mississippi Baptist Medical CenterJackson, MS	9	1.0526	1% cut	$859K	Above the national median on 6 of 6 measures
5	University of Mississippi Med CenterJackson, MS	9	0.6118	1% cut	$1.4M	Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
6	Merit Health CentralJackson, MS	13	−0.4157	No cut	$0	Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures
7	Merit Health MadisonCanton, MS	21	−0.8557	No cut	$0	Above the national median on 0 of 4 measures
8	Magee General HospitalMagee, MS	34	1.1360	1% cut	$13K	Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Crossgates River Oaks Hospital, Brandon, MS: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/250096/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.