P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSanford Bemidji Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$100K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 240100

1Hospital

Sanford Bemidji Medical Center

2Location

Bemidji, MN (Minnesota’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 56601

Beltrami County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 118 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Rural referral center · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

4 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.4904

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$183K estimate
Likely $142⁠–⁠223K; about $132 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$183K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4904 for Sanford Bemidji Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $18.3M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $132 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $142–223K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4904 This hospital 0.4904 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4904 This hospital 0.4904

Higher than 79% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 7 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.4210, to 0.0694. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 68% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0155

    Z-score0.1885

    Part of score+0.0314

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 62% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.434

    Z-score−0.3997

    Part of score−0.0666

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 98% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value2.077

    Z-score2.3863

    Part of score+0.3977

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 77% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.275

    Z-score0.7276

    Part of score+0.1213

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 71% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.496

    Z-score0.4584

    Part of score+0.0764

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 63% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.497

    Z-score−0.4186

    Part of score−0.0698

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.01550.96230.1885+0.0314Worse than 68% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.4340.559−0.3997−0.0666Better than 62% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI2.0770.4892.3863+0.3977Worse than 98% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.2750.7950.7276+0.1213Worse than 77% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.4960.3460.4584+0.0764Worse than 71% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.4970.641−0.4186−0.0698Better than 63% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.1885PSI 90−0.3997CLABSI+2.3863CAUTI+0.7276SSI+0.4584CDI−0.4186MRSA)÷6measures=0.4904Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.1112 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.4904, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.1885 divided by 6 = +0.0314PSI 90+0.0314 CLABSI: z‑score −0.3997 divided by 6 = −0.0666CLABSI−0.0666 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 6 = +0.3977CAUTI+0.3977 SSI: z‑score 0.7276 divided by 6 = +0.1213SSI+0.1213 CDI: z‑score 0.4584 divided by 6 = +0.0764CDI+0.0764 MRSA: z‑score −0.4186 divided by 6 = −0.0698MRSA−0.0698 Total HAC Score: 0.4904Score0.4904 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.1885 divided by 6 = +0.0314PSI 90+0.0314 CLABSI: z‑score −0.3997 divided by 6 = −0.0666CLABSI−0.0666 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 6 = +0.3977CAUTI+0.3977 SSI: z‑score 0.7276 divided by 6 = +0.1213SSI+0.1213 CDI: z‑score 0.4584 divided by 6 = +0.0764CDI+0.0764 MRSA: z‑score −0.4186 divided by 6 = −0.0698MRSA−0.0698 Total HAC Score: 0.4904Score0.4904 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.1885+0.03140.0314
CLABSI−0.3997−0.0666−0.0352
CAUTI2.3863+0.39770.3625
SSI0.7276+0.12130.4838
CDI0.4584+0.07640.5602
MRSA−0.4186−0.06980.4904
Total HAC Score0.4904
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1112 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $183K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $183K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $183K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4904 This hospital 0.4904 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $183K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $183Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4904 This hospital 0.4904

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$182,754
This hospital0.4904−$182,754
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$182,754

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($18,192,881payment+$0readmissions+$82,512value-based)×1%the cut=$182,754HAC cut

$182,754HAC cut÷1,383traditional Medicare stays=$132per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $183K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and +$83K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $14,730,500
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $739,176
Outliers: unusually costly stays $456,056
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,148,746
Uncompensated care $1,118,403
Total, before the three programs $18,192,881
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0056 − 1) +$82,512
After these two $18,275,393
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $142⁠–⁠223K −$182,754
Net of the three programs likely −$116K to −$80K −$100,242

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$14,730,500
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$739,176
Outliers: unusually costly stays$456,056
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,148,746
Uncompensated care$1,118,403
Total, before the three programs$18,192,881
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0056 − 1))+$82,512
After these two$18,275,393
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $142–223K)−$182,754
Net of the three programs (likely −$116K to −$80K)−$100,242

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.4904same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$183Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4904 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $183K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.9198 or lower
CLABSI0.146 or lower
CAUTI1.260 or lower
SSI0.885 or lower
CDI0.323 or lower
MRSA0.177 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0155 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.434 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 2.077 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.275 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.496 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.497 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.4904 among its measured results: +0.3977.
  • PSI 90 +0.0314
  • CLABSI −0.0666
  • CAUTI +0.3977
  • SSI +0.1213
  • CDI +0.0764
  • MRSA −0.0698

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.1885+0.0314same
CLABSI−0.3997−0.0666same
CAUTI2.3863+0.3977same
SSI0.7276+0.1213same
CDI0.4584+0.0764same
MRSA−0.4186−0.0698same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/240100/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 6 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 7 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 8.3000, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.2500, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.7200, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.6084, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.6226, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.9138, higher than 94% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.0758, higher than 58% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2640, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.3167, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.3129, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.4904, higher than 79% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 8.3000, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.2500, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.7200, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.6084, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.6226, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.9138, higher than 94% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.0758, higher than 58% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2640, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.3167, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.3129, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.4904, higher than 79% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20158.300091.8%cut
FY20167.250081.2%cut
FY20176.720078.6%cut
FY20180.608485.8%cut
FY20190.622686.2%cut
FY20200.913894.3%cut
FY20210.075858.6%not cut
FY2022−0.264033.1%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.316730.7%not cut
FY20250.312972.4%not cut
FY20260.490479.8%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.83 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2018: 0.833CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 1.634CLABSI, 2022: 0.923CLABSI, 2023: 0.797CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 1.00 → 1.51 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.004CAUTI, 2018: 1.787CAUTI, 2019: 1.096CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.574CAUTI, 2023: 2.562CAUTI, 2024: 1.506 SSI, colon 1.21 → 0.81 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.214SSI, colon, 2018: 1.408SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.521SSI, colon, 2023: 0.782SSI, colon, 2024: 0.812 MRSA 0.00 → 0.94 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 0.734MRSA, 2021: 1.669MRSA, 2022: 0.000MRSA, 2023: 0.940 C. diff 1.36 → 0.29 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.358C. diff, 2018: 0.597C. diff, 2019: 0.520C. diff, 2021: 0.268C. diff, 2022: 0.354C. diff, 2023: 0.704C. diff, 2024: 0.294 CLABSI 0.83 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2018: 0.833CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 1.634CLABSI, 2022: 0.923CLABSI, 2023: 0.797CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 1.00 → 1.51 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.004CAUTI, 2018: 1.787CAUTI, 2019: 1.096CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.574CAUTI, 2023: 2.562CAUTI, 2024: 1.506 SSI, colon 1.21 → 0.81 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.214SSI, colon, 2018: 1.408SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.521SSI, colon, 2023: 0.782SSI, colon, 2024: 0.812 MRSA 0.00 → 0.94 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 0.734MRSA, 2021: 1.669MRSA, 2022: 0.000MRSA, 2023: 0.940 C. diff 1.36 → 0.29 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.358C. diff, 2018: 0.597C. diff, 2019: 0.520C. diff, 2021: 0.268C. diff, 2022: 0.354C. diff, 2023: 0.704C. diff, 2024: 0.294

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20171.0041.2141.358
20180.8331.7871.4080.0000.597
20190.0001.0960.0000.7340.520
20211.6340.0000.0001.6690.268
20220.9230.5740.5210.0000.354
20230.7972.5620.7820.9400.704
20240.0001.5060.8120.294

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Minnesota, its score is higher than 79% of the other 44 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (100 to 299 beds) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Minnesota: CMS cut 11 of 45 (24%); middle score −0.0442Minnesota 45 hospitals24% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.4904 This hospital 0.4904 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Minnesota: CMS cut 11 of 45 (24%); middle score −0.0442Minnesota45 hospitals24% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.4904 This hospital 0.4904

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045379%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026878%
Minnesota451124%−0.044279%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105379%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073281%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013479%
Rural61919632%0.022972%
This hospital0.4904
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 65 miles away.
25 mi50 mi100 mi8. Altru Hospital, Grand Forks: score −0.0753, not cut, 105 miles87. Essentia Health, Fargo: score −0.5119, not cut, 102 miles76. Lake Region Healthcare Corporation, Fergus Falls: score 0.4034, cut, 101 miles65. Sanford Medical Center Fargo, Fargo: score −0.3139, not cut, 98 miles54. Range Regional Health Services, Hibbing: score −0.2569, not cut, 92 miles43. Essentia Health St Joseph's Medical Center, Brainerd: score −0.0732, not cut, 86 miles32. Grand Itasca Clinic and Hospital, Grand Rapids: score 0.3564, not cut, 66 miles21. Essentia Health St Marys - Detroit Lakes, Detroit Lakes: score −0.3979, not cut, 65 miles1This hospital: Sanford Bemidji Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Essentia Health St Marys - Detroit Lakes, Detroit Lakes, MN65−0.3979not cut
Grand Itasca Clinic and Hospital, Grand Rapids, MN660.3564not cut
Essentia Health St Joseph's Medical Center, Brainerd, MN86−0.0732not cut
Range Regional Health Services, Hibbing, MN92−0.2569not cut
Sanford Medical Center Fargo, Fargo, ND98−0.3139not cut
Lake Region Healthcare Corporation, Fergus Falls, MN1010.4034cut
Essentia Health, Fargo, ND102−0.5119not cut
Altru Hospital, Grand Forks, ND105−0.0753not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Essentia Health St Marys - Detroit LakesDetroit Lakes, MN65−0.3979No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 3 measures
2Grand Itasca Clinic and HospitalGrand Rapids, MN660.3564No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 3 measures
3Essentia Health St Joseph's Medical CenterBrainerd, MN86−0.0732No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
4Range Regional Health ServicesHibbing, MN92−0.2569No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 3 measures
5Sanford Medical Center FargoFargo, ND98−0.3139No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
6Lake Region Healthcare CorporationFergus Falls, MN1010.40341% cut$55KAbove the national median on 2 of 4 measures
7Essentia HealthFargo, ND102−0.5119No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
8Altru HospitalGrand Forks, ND105−0.0753No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Sanford Bemidji Medical Center, Bemidji, MN: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/240100/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.