P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalMayo Clinic Hospital Rochester Estimated FY2026 net: +$5.7M×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 240010

1Hospital

Mayo Clinic Hospital Rochester

2Location

Rochester, MN (Minnesota’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 55902

Olmsted County

3Type

Major teaching · 2,059 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

5 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.2723

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $5.0M, likely $4.1⁠–⁠5.5M estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.2723 for Mayo Clinic Hospital Rochester and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $5.0M estimate 1% of about $502M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.6522 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $4.1–5.5M

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.2723 This hospital −0.2723 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.2723 This hospital −0.2723

Higher than 34% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CDI down to the national median (0.346) would lower the score the most: by 0.1646, to −0.4369. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; CDI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 95% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.7753

    Z-score−1.4834

    Part of score−0.2472

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 58% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.474

    Z-score−0.3069

    Part of score−0.0512

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 66% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.649

    Z-score0.2458

    Part of score+0.0410

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 56% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.696

    Z-score−0.2642

    Part of score−0.0440

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 81% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.601

    Z-score0.8649

    Part of score+0.1442

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 74% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.367

    Z-score−0.6903

    Part of score−0.1151

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.77530.9623−1.4834−0.2472Better than 95% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.4740.559−0.3069−0.0512Better than 58% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.6490.4890.2458+0.0410Worse than 66% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.6960.795−0.2642−0.0440Better than 56% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.6010.3460.8649+0.1442Worse than 81% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.3670.641−0.6903−0.1151Better than 74% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−1.4834PSI 90−0.3069CLABSI+0.2458CAUTI−0.2642SSI+0.8649CDI−0.6903MRSA)÷6measures=−0.2723Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.2724; CMS reports −0.2723. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.6522 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.2723, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.4834 divided by 6 = −0.2472PSI 90−0.2472 CLABSI: z‑score −0.3069 divided by 6 = −0.0512CLABSI−0.0512 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2458 divided by 6 = +0.0410CAUTI+0.0410 SSI: z‑score −0.2642 divided by 6 = −0.0440SSI−0.0440 CDI: z‑score 0.8649 divided by 6 = +0.1442CDI+0.1442 MRSA: z‑score −0.6903 divided by 6 = −0.1151MRSA−0.1151 Total HAC Score: −0.2723Score−0.2723 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.4−0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.4834 divided by 6 = −0.2472PSI 90−0.2472 CLABSI: z‑score −0.3069 divided by 6 = −0.0512CLABSI−0.0512 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2458 divided by 6 = +0.0410CAUTI+0.0410 SSI: z‑score −0.2642 divided by 6 = −0.0440SSI−0.0440 CDI: z‑score 0.8649 divided by 6 = +0.1442CDI+0.1442 MRSA: z‑score −0.6903 divided by 6 = −0.1151MRSA−0.1151 Total HAC Score: −0.2723Score−0.2723 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.4−0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−1.4834−0.2472−0.2472
CLABSI−0.3069−0.0512−0.2984
CAUTI0.2458+0.0410−0.2574
SSI−0.2642−0.0440−0.3014
CDI0.8649+0.1442−0.1572
MRSA−0.6903−0.1151−0.2723
Total HAC Score−0.2723
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.6522 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.6522 higher, the cut would have been about $5.0M by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $5.0M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $5.0M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.2723 This hospital −0.2723 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $5.0M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $5.0Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.2723 This hospital −0.2723

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$5,019,123
This hospital−0.2723$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$5,019,123

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($462,057,351payment+$34,175,757teaching, MA stays+$0readmissions+$5,679,202value-based)×1%the cut=$5,019,123at stake

$5,019,123at stake÷15,015traditional Medicare stays=$334per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $5.0M by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and +$5.7M.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $293,275,662
Teaching (indirect medical education) $59,687,463
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $34,175,757
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $4,317,018
Outliers: unusually costly stays $57,109,570
Sole community hospital rate difference $19,131,811
Capital: buildings and equipment $28,535,827
Total, before the three programs $496,233,108
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0194 − 1) +$5,679,202
After these two $501,912,310
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $5,019,123 $0
Net of the three programs likely $4.8⁠–⁠6.2M +$5,679,202

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$293,275,662
Teaching (indirect medical education)$59,687,463
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$34,175,757
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$4,317,018
Outliers: unusually costly stays$57,109,570
Sole community hospital rate difference$19,131,811
Capital: buildings and equipment$28,535,827
Total, before the three programs$496,233,108
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0194 − 1))+$5,679,202
After these two$501,912,310
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $5,019,123)$0
Net of the three programs (likely $4.8–6.2M)+$5,679,202

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.2723same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.2723 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $5.0M out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.3358
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.7753 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.474 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.649 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.696 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.601 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.367 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CDI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.2723 among its measured results: +0.1442.
  • PSI 90 −0.2472
  • CLABSI −0.0512
  • CAUTI +0.0410
  • SSI −0.0440
  • CDI +0.1442
  • MRSA −0.1151

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−1.4834−0.2472same
CLABSI−0.3069−0.0512same
CAUTI0.2458+0.0410same
SSI−0.2642−0.0440same
CDI0.8649+0.1442same
MRSA−0.6903−0.1151same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/240010/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.3000, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.2500, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.5100, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.4730, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2022, higher than 37% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.1167, higher than 42% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2069, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2645, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5437, higher than 17% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.4609, higher than 21% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.2723, higher than 34% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.3000, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.2500, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.5100, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.4730, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2022, higher than 37% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.1167, higher than 42% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2069, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2645, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5437, higher than 17% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.4609, higher than 21% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.2723, higher than 34% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20155.300047.5%not cut
FY20166.250064.4%not cut
FY20175.510052.0%not cut
FY2018−0.473022.0%not cut
FY2019−0.202237.2%not cut
FY2020−0.116742.9%not cut
FY2021−0.206936.9%not cut
FY2022−0.264533.0%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.543717.3%not cut
FY2025−0.460921.8%not cut
FY2026−0.272334.0%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 5 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.97 → 0.52 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.968CLABSI, 2018: 0.946CLABSI, 2019: 0.611CLABSI, 2021: 0.667CLABSI, 2022: 0.572CLABSI, 2023: 0.426CLABSI, 2024: 0.519 CAUTI 0.30 → 0.67 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.303CAUTI, 2018: 0.510CAUTI, 2019: 0.498CAUTI, 2021: 0.499CAUTI, 2022: 0.535CAUTI, 2023: 0.628CAUTI, 2024: 0.671 SSI, colon 1.53 → 0.70 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.532SSI, colon, 2018: 0.999SSI, colon, 2019: 0.685SSI, colon, 2021: 0.628SSI, colon, 2022: 0.565SSI, colon, 2023: 0.609SSI, colon, 2024: 0.703 SSI, hysterectomy 1.19 → 0.57 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.187SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.217SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.402SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.643SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.275SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.643SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.569 MRSA 0.92 → 0.27 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.924MRSA, 2018: 0.294MRSA, 2019: 0.651MRSA, 2021: 0.462MRSA, 2022: 0.509MRSA, 2023: 0.467MRSA, 2024: 0.274 C. diff 0.68 → 0.59 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.680C. diff, 2018: 0.609C. diff, 2019: 0.557C. diff, 2021: 0.528C. diff, 2022: 0.510C. diff, 2023: 0.612C. diff, 2024: 0.590 CLABSI 0.97 → 0.52 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.968CLABSI, 2018: 0.946CLABSI, 2019: 0.611CLABSI, 2021: 0.667CLABSI, 2022: 0.572CLABSI, 2023: 0.426CLABSI, 2024: 0.519 CAUTI 0.30 → 0.67 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.303CAUTI, 2018: 0.510CAUTI, 2019: 0.498CAUTI, 2021: 0.499CAUTI, 2022: 0.535CAUTI, 2023: 0.628CAUTI, 2024: 0.671 SSI, colon 1.53 → 0.70 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.532SSI, colon, 2018: 0.999SSI, colon, 2019: 0.685SSI, colon, 2021: 0.628SSI, colon, 2022: 0.565SSI, colon, 2023: 0.609SSI, colon, 2024: 0.703 SSI, hysterectomy 1.19 → 0.57 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.187SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.217SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.402SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.643SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.275SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.643SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.569 MRSA 0.92 → 0.27 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.924MRSA, 2018: 0.294MRSA, 2019: 0.651MRSA, 2021: 0.462MRSA, 2022: 0.509MRSA, 2023: 0.467MRSA, 2024: 0.274 C. diff 0.68 → 0.59 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.680C. diff, 2018: 0.609C. diff, 2019: 0.557C. diff, 2021: 0.528C. diff, 2022: 0.510C. diff, 2023: 0.612C. diff, 2024: 0.590

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20170.9680.3031.5321.1870.9240.680
20180.9460.5100.9991.2170.2940.609
20190.6110.4980.6851.4020.6510.557
20210.6670.4990.6280.6430.4620.528
20220.5720.5350.5650.2750.5090.510
20230.4260.6280.6091.6430.4670.612
20240.5190.6710.7030.5690.2740.590

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Minnesota, its score is higher than 27% of the other 44 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 32% (Major teaching).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Minnesota: CMS cut 11 of 45 (24%); middle score −0.0442Minnesota 45 hospitals24% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up 365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.2723 This hospital −0.2723 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Minnesota: CMS cut 11 of 45 (24%); middle score −0.0442Minnesota45 hospitals24% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.2723 This hospital −0.2723

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045334%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026832%
Minnesota451124%−0.044227%
Major teaching42413632%0.178019%
500 beds and up36510529%0.132319%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013430%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057433%
This hospital−0.2723
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 4 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, La Crosse: score −0.0374, not cut, 63 miles87. Mayo Clinic Health System - Albert Lea and Austin, Albert Lea: score −0.7016, not cut, 51 miles76. Northfield Hospital, Northfield: score 0.7800, cut, 47 miles65. Winona Health Services, Winona: score 0.3649, not cut, 43 miles54. Allina Health Faribault Medical Center, Faribault: score 1.0743, cut, 43 miles43. Owatonna Hospital, Owatonna: score 0.6938, cut, 37 miles32. Mayo Clinic Health System in Red Wing, Red Wing: score −0.3248, not cut, 34 miles21. Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester: score 1.0052, cut, 2 miles1This hospital: Mayo Clinic Hospital Rochester

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, MN21.0052cut
Mayo Clinic Health System in Red Wing, Red Wing, MN34−0.3248not cut
Owatonna Hospital, Owatonna, MN370.6938cut
Allina Health Faribault Medical Center, Faribault, MN431.0743cut
Winona Health Services, Winona, MN430.3649not cut
Northfield Hospital, Northfield, MN470.7800cut
Mayo Clinic Health System - Albert Lea and Austin, Albert Lea, MN51−0.7016not cut
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, La Crosse, WI63−0.0374not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Olmsted Medical CenterRochester, MN21.00521% cut$29KAbove the national median on 1 of 2 measures
2Mayo Clinic Health System in Red WingRed Wing, MN34−0.3248No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 3 measures
3Owatonna HospitalOwatonna, MN370.69381% cut$53KAbove the national median on 1 of 2 measures
4Allina Health Faribault Medical CenterFaribault, MN431.07431% cut$57KAbove the national median on 2 of 2 measures
5Winona Health ServicesWinona, MN430.3649No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 3 measures
6Northfield HospitalNorthfield, MN470.78001% cut$53KAbove the national median on 3 of 3 measures
7Mayo Clinic Health System - Albert Lea and AustinAlbert Lea, MN51−0.7016No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Gundersen Lutheran Medical CenterLa Crosse, WI63−0.0374No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Mayo Clinic Hospital Rochester, Rochester, MN: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/240010/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.