P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalMymichigan Medical Center Saginaw Estimated FY2026 net: −$318K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 230077

1Hospital

Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw

2Location

Saginaw, MI (Michigan’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 48601

Saginaw County

3Type

Major teaching · 268 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.7563

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$305K estimate
Likely $233⁠–⁠384K; about $184 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$305K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7563 for Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $30.5M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $184 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $233–384K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7563 This hospital 0.7563 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7563 This hospital 0.7563

Higher than 88% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 4 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.3917, to 0.3646. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 70% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0298

    Z-score0.2882

    Part of score+0.0480

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 98% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value2.189

    Z-score2.2402

    Part of score+0.3734

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 73% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value0.740

    Z-score0.4652

    Part of score+0.0775

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 72% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value1.161

    Z-score0.5323

    Part of score+0.0887

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 71% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.209

    Z-score−0.6529

    Part of score−0.1088

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 91% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value1.494

    Z-score1.6650

    Part of score+0.2775

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.02980.96230.2882+0.0480Worse than 70% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI2.1890.5592.2402+0.3734Worse than 98% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.7400.4890.4652+0.0775Worse than 73% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.1610.7950.5323+0.0887Worse than 72% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.2090.346−0.6529−0.1088Better than 71% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.4940.6411.6650+0.2775Worse than 91% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.2882PSI 90+2.2402CLABSI+0.4652CAUTI+0.5323SSI−0.6529CDI+1.6650MRSA)÷6measures=0.7563Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.3771 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.7563, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.2882 divided by 6 = +0.0480PSI 90+0.0480 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4652 divided by 6 = +0.0775CAUTI+0.0775 SSI: z‑score 0.5323 divided by 6 = +0.0887SSI+0.0887 CDI: z‑score −0.6529 divided by 6 = −0.1088CDI−0.1088 MRSA: z‑score 1.6650 divided by 6 = +0.2775MRSA+0.2775 Total HAC Score: 0.7563Score0.7563 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.2882 divided by 6 = +0.0480PSI 90+0.0480 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4652 divided by 6 = +0.0775CAUTI+0.0775 SSI: z‑score 0.5323 divided by 6 = +0.0887SSI+0.0887 CDI: z‑score −0.6529 divided by 6 = −0.1088CDI−0.1088 MRSA: z‑score 1.6650 divided by 6 = +0.2775MRSA+0.2775 Total HAC Score: 0.7563Score0.7563 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.2882+0.04800.0480
CLABSI2.2402+0.37340.4214
CAUTI0.4652+0.07750.4989
SSI0.5323+0.08870.5876
CDI−0.6529−0.10880.4788
MRSA1.6650+0.27750.7563
Total HAC Score0.7563
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.3771 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $305K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $305K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $305K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7563 This hospital 0.7563 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $305K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $305Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7563 This hospital 0.7563

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$305,172
This hospital0.7563−$305,172
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$305,172

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($27,552,099payment+$2,978,306teaching, MA stays−$13,187readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$305,172HAC cut

$305,172HAC cut÷1,657traditional Medicare stays=$184per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $305K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$13K and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $21,977,590
Teaching (indirect medical education) $1,671,396
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $2,978,306
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $464,606
Outliers: unusually costly stays $416,475
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,949,907
Uncompensated care $1,072,125
Total, before the three programs $30,530,405
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9994 − 1) −$13,187
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $30,517,218
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $233⁠–⁠384K −$305,172
Net of the three programs likely −$374K to −$256K −$318,359

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$21,977,590
Teaching (indirect medical education)$1,671,396
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$2,978,306
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$464,606
Outliers: unusually costly stays$416,475
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,949,907
Uncompensated care$1,072,125
Total, before the three programs$30,530,405
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9994 − 1))−$13,187
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$30,517,218
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $233–384K)−$305,172
Net of the three programs (likely −$374K to −$256K)−$318,359

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.7563same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$305Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7563 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $305K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSI0.596 or lower
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSA0.411 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0298 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 2.189 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.740 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.161 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.209 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.494 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.7563 among its measured results: +0.3734.
  • PSI 90 +0.0480
  • CLABSI +0.3734
  • CAUTI +0.0775
  • SSI +0.0887
  • CDI −0.1088
  • MRSA +0.2775

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.2882+0.0480same
CLABSI2.2402+0.3734same
CAUTI0.4652+0.0775same
SSI0.5323+0.0887same
CDI−0.6529−0.1088same
MRSA1.6650+0.2775same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/230077/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 4 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.1250, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.7500, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.2600, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1689, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2058, higher than 37% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.1505, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.2873, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.6207, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.4860, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.8185, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.7563, higher than 88% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.1250, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.7500, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.2600, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1689, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2058, higher than 37% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.1505, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.2873, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.6207, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.4860, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.8185, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.7563, higher than 88% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20155.125045.8%not cut
FY20164.750033.4%not cut
FY20175.260047.5%not cut
FY2018−0.168939.0%not cut
FY2019−0.205837.0%not cut
FY2020−0.150540.3%not cut
FY20210.287372.4%not cut
FY20220.620786.7%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.486079.8%cut
FY20250.818590.7%cut
FY20260.756388.7%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.09 → 2.44 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.085CLABSI, 2018: 0.322CLABSI, 2019: 0.494CLABSI, 2021: 1.309CLABSI, 2022: 1.585CLABSI, 2023: 2.435 CAUTI 0.54 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.540CAUTI, 2018: 0.473CAUTI, 2019: 0.712CAUTI, 2021: 0.394CAUTI, 2022: 1.095CAUTI, 2023: 0.901CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.31 → 1.59 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.312SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 1.070SSI, colon, 2021: 0.941SSI, colon, 2022: 0.781SSI, colon, 2023: 1.076SSI, colon, 2024: 1.591 MRSA 2.46 → 1.54 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 2.457MRSA, 2018: 3.822MRSA, 2019: 2.357MRSA, 2021: 2.073MRSA, 2022: 1.293MRSA, 2023: 1.536 C. diff 0.74 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.741C. diff, 2018: 0.530C. diff, 2019: 0.862C. diff, 2021: 1.027C. diff, 2022: 0.683C. diff, 2023: 0.273C. diff, 2024: 0.000 CLABSI 0.09 → 2.44 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.085CLABSI, 2018: 0.322CLABSI, 2019: 0.494CLABSI, 2021: 1.309CLABSI, 2022: 1.585CLABSI, 2023: 2.435 CAUTI 0.54 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.540CAUTI, 2018: 0.473CAUTI, 2019: 0.712CAUTI, 2021: 0.394CAUTI, 2022: 1.095CAUTI, 2023: 0.901CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.31 → 1.59 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.312SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 1.070SSI, colon, 2021: 0.941SSI, colon, 2022: 0.781SSI, colon, 2023: 1.076SSI, colon, 2024: 1.591 MRSA 2.46 → 1.54 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 2.457MRSA, 2018: 3.822MRSA, 2019: 2.357MRSA, 2021: 2.073MRSA, 2022: 1.293MRSA, 2023: 1.536 C. diff 0.74 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.741C. diff, 2018: 0.530C. diff, 2019: 0.862C. diff, 2021: 1.027C. diff, 2022: 0.683C. diff, 2023: 0.273C. diff, 2024: 0.000

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.0850.5400.3122.4570.741
20180.3220.4730.0003.8220.530
20190.4940.7121.0702.3570.862
20211.3090.3940.9412.0731.027
20221.5851.0950.7811.2930.683
20232.4350.9011.0761.5360.273
20240.0001.5910.000

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Michigan, its score is higher than 82% of the other 87 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 34% (Michigan).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Michigan: CMS cut 30 of 88 (34%); middle score 0.0204Michigan 88 hospitals34% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.7563 This hospital 0.7563 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Michigan: CMS cut 30 of 88 (34%); middle score 0.0204Michigan88 hospitals34% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.7563 This hospital 0.7563

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045388%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026888%
Michigan883034%0.020482%
Major teaching42413632%0.178087%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073291%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013489%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057490%
This hospital0.7563
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is less than a mile away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Mymichigan Medical Center Alma, Alma: score −0.6373, not cut, 36 miles87. Memorial Healthcare, Owosso: score −0.3047, not cut, 31 miles76. Hurley Medical Center, Flint: score −0.3447, not cut, 30 miles65. McLaren Flint, Flint: score −0.2011, not cut, 30 miles54. Mymichigan Medical Center Midland, Midland: score 0.2568, not cut, 27 miles43. McLaren Bay Region, Bay City: score −0.4804, not cut, 12 miles32. Healthsource Saginaw, Saginaw: score −1.4622, not cut, 6 miles21. Covenant Medical Center, Saginaw: score 0.5105, cut, less than a mile1This hospital: Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Covenant Medical Center, Saginaw, MIunder 10.5105cut
Healthsource Saginaw, Saginaw, MI6−1.4622not cut
McLaren Bay Region, Bay City, MI12−0.4804not cut
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland, Midland, MI270.2568not cut
McLaren Flint, Flint, MI30−0.2011not cut
Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI30−0.3447not cut
Memorial Healthcare, Owosso, MI31−0.3047not cut
Mymichigan Medical Center Alma, Alma, MI36−0.6373not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Covenant Medical CenterSaginaw, MIunder 10.51051% cut$712KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
2Healthsource SaginawSaginaw, MI6−1.4622No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
3McLaren Bay RegionBay City, MI12−0.4804No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
4Mymichigan Medical Center MidlandMidland, MI270.2568No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5McLaren FlintFlint, MI30−0.2011No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6Hurley Medical CenterFlint, MI30−0.3447No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
7Memorial HealthcareOwosso, MI31−0.3047No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Mymichigan Medical Center AlmaAlma, MI36−0.6373No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

29
This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw, Saginaw, MI: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/230077/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.