P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalMarlborough Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$456K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 220049

1Hospital

Marlborough Hospital

2Location

Marlborough, MA (Massachusetts’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 01752

Middlesex County

3Type

Minor teaching · 79 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.5125

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$171K estimate
Likely $125⁠–⁠212K; about $126 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$171K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.5125 for Marlborough Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $17.1M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $126 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $125–212K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.5125 This hospital 0.5125 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.5125 This hospital 0.5125

Higher than 80% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 1 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing MRSA down to the national median (0.641) would lower the score the most: by 0.4686, to 0.0439. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 5 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 69% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0239

    Z-score0.2473

    Part of score+0.0495

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 50% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.561

    Z-score−0.1051

    Part of score−0.0210

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 61% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.605

    Z-score0.1397

    Part of score+0.0279

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 57% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.392

    Z-score0.0557

    Part of score+0.0111

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 99% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value3.817

    Z-score2.2251

    Part of score+0.4450

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.02390.96230.2473+0.0495Worse than 69% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.5610.559−0.1051−0.0210Worse than 50% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.6050.4890.1397+0.0279Worse than 61% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDI0.3920.3460.0557+0.0111Worse than 57% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA3.8170.6412.2251+0.4450Worse than 99% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.2473PSI 90−0.1051CLABSI+0.1397CAUTI+0.0557CDI+2.2251MRSA)÷5measures=0.5125Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.1333 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.5125, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.2473 divided by 5 = +0.0495PSI 90+0.0495 CLABSI: z‑score −0.1051 divided by 5 = −0.0210CLABSI−0.0210 CAUTI: z‑score 0.1397 divided by 5 = +0.0279CAUTI+0.0279 CDI: z‑score 0.0557 divided by 5 = +0.0111CDI+0.0111 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: 0.5125Score0.5125 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.40.5 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.2473 divided by 5 = +0.0495PSI 90+0.0495 CLABSI: z‑score −0.1051 divided by 5 = −0.0210CLABSI−0.0210 CAUTI: z‑score 0.1397 divided by 5 = +0.0279CAUTI+0.0279 CDI: z‑score 0.0557 divided by 5 = +0.0111CDI+0.0111 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: 0.5125Score0.5125 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.40.5

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.2473+0.04950.0495
CLABSI−0.1051−0.02100.0285
CAUTI0.1397+0.02790.0564
CDI0.0557+0.01110.0675
MRSA2.2251+0.44500.5125
Total HAC Score0.5125
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1333 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $171K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $171K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $171K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.5125 This hospital 0.5125 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $171K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $171Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.5125 This hospital 0.5125

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$170,857
This hospital0.5125−$170,857
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$170,857

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($17,371,070payment−$202,867readmissions−$82,462value-based)×1%the cut=$170,857HAC cut

$170,857HAC cut÷1,352traditional Medicare stays=$126per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $171K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$203K and −$82K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $14,490,494
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $434,715
Outliers: unusually costly stays $683,951
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,144,860
Uncompensated care $617,050
Total, before the three programs $17,371,070
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9860 − 1) −$202,867
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9943 − 1) −$82,462
After these two $17,085,741
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $125⁠–⁠212K −$170,857
Net of the three programs likely −$582K to −$330K −$456,186

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$14,490,494
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$434,715
Outliers: unusually costly stays$683,951
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,144,860
Uncompensated care$617,050
Total, before the three programs$17,371,070
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9860 − 1))−$202,867
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9943 − 1))−$82,462
After these two$17,085,741
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $125–212K)−$170,857
Net of the three programs (likely −$582K to −$330K)−$456,186

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.5125same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$171Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.5125 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $171K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.9283 or lower
CLABSI0.273 or lower
CAUTI0.328 or lower
CDI0.219 or lower
MRSA1.443 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0239 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 0.561 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0464

CMS 0.605 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

CMS 0.392 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

CMS 3.817 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0418

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.5125 among its measured results: +0.4450.
  • PSI 90 +0.0495
  • CLABSI −0.0210
  • CAUTI +0.0279
  • CDI +0.0111
  • MRSA +0.4450

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.2473+0.0495same
CLABSI−0.1051−0.0210same
CAUTI0.1397+0.0279same
CDI0.0557+0.0111same
MRSA2.2251+0.4450same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 1 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.6000, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.5000, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.2125, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.2590, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.389, higher than 26% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4114, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.4380, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.6140, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.1256, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.3022, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.5125, higher than 80% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.6000, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.5000, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.2125, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.2590, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.389, higher than 26% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4114, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.4380, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.6140, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.1256, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.3022, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.5125, higher than 80% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.600034.7%not cut
FY20163.500016.7%not cut
FY20172.21259.7%not cut
FY2018−0.259033.5%not cut
FY2019−0.38926.0%not cut
FY2020−0.411424.2%not cut
FY2021−0.438022.4%not cut
FY2022−0.614015.1%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.125643.5%not cut
FY20250.302271.6%not cut
FY20260.512580.9%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 3 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.68 → 1.13 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 0.683CLABSI, 2022: 0.643CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 1.127 CAUTI 1.32 → 0.37 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.318CAUTI, 2018: 0.594CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 2.135CAUTI, 2022: 0.374CAUTI, 2023: 0.884CAUTI, 2024: 0.371 C. diff 0.29 → 0.45 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.292C. diff, 2018: 0.173C. diff, 2019: 0.445C. diff, 2021: 1.489C. diff, 2022: 0.507C. diff, 2023: 0.333C. diff, 2024: 0.446 CLABSI 0.68 → 1.13 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 0.683CLABSI, 2022: 0.643CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 1.127 CAUTI 1.32 → 0.37 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.318CAUTI, 2018: 0.594CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 2.135CAUTI, 2022: 0.374CAUTI, 2023: 0.884CAUTI, 2024: 0.371 C. diff 0.29 → 0.45 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.292C. diff, 2018: 0.173C. diff, 2019: 0.445C. diff, 2021: 1.489C. diff, 2022: 0.507C. diff, 2023: 0.333C. diff, 2024: 0.446

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIC. diff
20171.3180.292
20180.5940.173
20190.0000.445
20210.6832.1351.489
20220.6430.3740.507
20230.0000.8840.333
20241.1270.3710.446

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Massachusetts, its score is higher than 70% of the other 51 scored there.

In Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA area, its score is higher than 71% of the other 14 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 38% (Massachusetts).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region 436 hospitals28% cut Massachusetts: CMS cut 20 of 52 (38%); middle score 0.2735Massachusetts 52 hospitals38% cut Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA area: CMS cut 5 of 15 (33%); middle score 0.2495Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA area15 hospitals33% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.5125 This hospital 0.5125 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region436 hospitals28% cut Massachusetts: CMS cut 20 of 52 (38%); middle score 0.2735Massachusetts52 hospitals38% cut Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA area: CMS cut 5 of 15 (33%); middle score 0.2495Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA area15 hospitals33% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.5125 This hospital 0.5125

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045380%
Northeast region43612428%0.047878%
Massachusetts522038%0.273570%
Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA area15533%0.249571%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056785%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115475%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013480%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057483%
This hospital0.5125
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 8 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton: score −0.2052, not cut, 16 miles87. Nashoba Valley Medical Center, Ayer: score 0.3424, not cut, 15 miles76. St Vincent Hospital, Worcester: score −0.2422, not cut, 14 miles65. Milford Regional Medical Center, Milford: score −0.3243, not cut, 14 miles54. Adcare Hospital of Worcester Inc, Worcester: score −0.2492, not cut, 13 miles43. UMass Memorial Medical Center/University Campus, Worcester: score 0.0177, not cut, 12 miles32. Emerson Hospital -, W Concord: score −0.5169, not cut, 11 miles21. Metrowest Medical Center, Framingham: score 0.5504, cut, 8 miles1This hospital: Marlborough Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Metrowest Medical Center, Framingham, MA80.5504cut
Emerson Hospital -, W Concord, MA11−0.5169not cut
UMass Memorial Medical Center/University Campus, Worcester, MA120.0177not cut
Adcare Hospital of Worcester Inc, Worcester, MA13−0.2492not cut
Milford Regional Medical Center, Milford, MA14−0.3243not cut
St Vincent Hospital, Worcester, MA14−0.2422not cut
Nashoba Valley Medical Center, Ayer, MA150.3424not cut
Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA16−0.2052not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Metrowest Medical CenterFramingham, MA80.55041% cut$361KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
2Emerson Hospital -W Concord, MA11−0.5169No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
3UMass Memorial Medical Center/University CampusWorcester, MA120.0177No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4Adcare Hospital of Worcester IncWorcester, MA13−0.2492No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 3 measures
5Milford Regional Medical CenterMilford, MA14−0.3243No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
6St Vincent HospitalWorcester, MA14−0.2422No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
7Nashoba Valley Medical CenterAyer, MA150.3424No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 2 measures
8Newton-Wellesley HospitalNewton, MA16−0.2052No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Marlborough Hospital, Marlborough, MA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/220049/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.