P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalTristar Greenview Regional Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$237K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 180124

1Hospital

Tristar Greenview Regional Hospital

2Location

Bowling Green, KY (Kentucky’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 42104

Warren County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 211 beds · For-profit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.1739

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $161K, likely $123⁠–⁠203K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.1739 for Tristar Greenview Regional Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $161K estimate 1% of about $16.1M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.2060 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $123–203K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.1739 This hospital 0.1739 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.1739 This hospital 0.1739

Higher than 63% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.3917, to −0.2178. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 91% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8120

    Z-score−1.2320

    Part of score−0.2053

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 95% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.635

    Z-score2.2402

    Part of score+0.3734

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.975

    Z-score1.0316

    Part of score+0.1719

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 87% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4565

    Part of score−0.2428

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 75% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.177

    Z-score−0.7768

    Part of score−0.1295

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 87% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.289

    Z-score1.2366

    Part of score+0.2061

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.81200.9623−1.2320−0.2053Better than 91% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.6350.5592.2402+0.3734Worse than 95% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.9750.4891.0316+0.1719Worse than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.0000.795−1.4565−0.2428Better than 87% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.1770.346−0.7768−0.1295Better than 75% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.2890.6411.2366+0.2061Worse than 87% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−1.2320PSI 90+2.2402CLABSI+1.0316CAUTI−1.4565SSI−0.7768CDI+1.2366MRSA)÷6measures=0.1739Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2060 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.1739, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.2320 divided by 6 = −0.2053PSI 90−0.2053 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score 1.0316 divided by 6 = +0.1719CAUTI+0.1719 SSI: z‑score −1.4565 divided by 6 = −0.2428SSI−0.2428 CDI: z‑score −0.7768 divided by 6 = −0.1295CDI−0.1295 MRSA: z‑score 1.2366 divided by 6 = +0.2061MRSA+0.2061 Total HAC Score: 0.1739Score0.1739 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.2320 divided by 6 = −0.2053PSI 90−0.2053 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score 1.0316 divided by 6 = +0.1719CAUTI+0.1719 SSI: z‑score −1.4565 divided by 6 = −0.2428SSI−0.2428 CDI: z‑score −0.7768 divided by 6 = −0.1295CDI−0.1295 MRSA: z‑score 1.2366 divided by 6 = +0.2061MRSA+0.2061 Total HAC Score: 0.1739Score0.1739 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−1.2320−0.2053−0.2053
CLABSI2.2402+0.37340.1681
CAUTI1.0316+0.17190.3400
SSI−1.4565−0.24280.0972
CDI−0.7768−0.1295−0.0323
MRSA1.2366+0.20610.1738
Total HAC Score0.1739
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2060 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.2060 higher, the cut would have been about $161K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $161K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $161K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.1739 This hospital 0.1739 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $161K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $161Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.1739 This hospital 0.1739

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$161,386
This hospital0.1739$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$161,386

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($16,375,877payment−$135,242readmissions−$102,029value-based)×1%the cut=$161,386at stake

$161,386at stake÷1,460traditional Medicare stays=$111per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $161K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$135K and −$102K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $14,087,713
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $287,248
Outliers: unusually costly stays $1,831
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,135,215
Uncompensated care $863,870
Total, before the three programs $16,375,877
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9904 − 1) −$135,242
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9928 − 1) −$102,029
After these two $16,138,606
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $161,386 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$279K to −$191K −$237,271

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$14,087,713
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$287,248
Outliers: unusually costly stays$1,831
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,135,215
Uncompensated care$863,870
Total, before the three programs$16,375,877
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9904 − 1))−$135,242
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9928 − 1))−$102,029
After these two$16,138,606
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $161,386)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$279K to −$191K)−$237,271

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.1739same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.1739 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $161K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 0.9883
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIup to 1.485
SSIup to 0.719
CDIup to 0.495
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8120 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.635 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.975 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.000 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.177 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.289 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.1739 among its measured results: +0.3734.
  • PSI 90 −0.2053
  • CLABSI +0.3734
  • CAUTI +0.1719
  • SSI −0.2428
  • CDI −0.1295
  • MRSA +0.2061

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−1.2320−0.2053same
CLABSI2.2402+0.3734same
CAUTI1.0316+0.1719same
SSI−1.4565−0.2428same
CDI−0.7768−0.1295same
MRSA1.2366+0.2061same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.5250, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.5000, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.5500, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.1855, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2239, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.7680, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.8164, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2022: score −0.0018, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.8234, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.7372, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.1739, higher than 63% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.5250, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.5000, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.5500, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.1855, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2239, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.7680, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.8164, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2022: score −0.0018, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.8234, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.7372, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.1739, higher than 63% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.525066.5%not cut
FY20163.500016.7%not cut
FY20173.550019.9%not cut
FY20180.185565.7%not cut
FY2019−0.223935.5%not cut
FY20200.768091.0%cut
FY20210.816492.9%cut
FY2022−0.001852.3%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.82347.2%not cut
FY2025−0.737210.6%not cut
FY20260.173963.0%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.67 → 0.96 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.667CLABSI, 2018: 3.077CLABSI, 2019: 1.949CLABSI, 2021: 1.922CLABSI, 2022: 0.920CLABSI, 2023: 0.964 CAUTI 0.50 → 0.74 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.504CAUTI, 2018: 0.514CAUTI, 2019: 0.737CAUTI, 2021: 3.844CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 1.161CAUTI, 2024: 0.739 SSI, colon 1.64 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.639SSI, colon, 2018: 2.735SSI, colon, 2019: 0.520SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 1.574SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 0.00 → 0.28 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.000C. diff, 2018: 0.343C. diff, 2019: 0.356C. diff, 2021: 0.230C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.085C. diff, 2024: 0.278 CLABSI 0.67 → 0.96 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.667CLABSI, 2018: 3.077CLABSI, 2019: 1.949CLABSI, 2021: 1.922CLABSI, 2022: 0.920CLABSI, 2023: 0.964 CAUTI 0.50 → 0.74 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.504CAUTI, 2018: 0.514CAUTI, 2019: 0.737CAUTI, 2021: 3.844CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 1.161CAUTI, 2024: 0.739 SSI, colon 1.64 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.639SSI, colon, 2018: 2.735SSI, colon, 2019: 0.520SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 1.574SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 0.00 → 0.28 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.000C. diff, 2018: 0.343C. diff, 2019: 0.356C. diff, 2021: 0.230C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.085C. diff, 2024: 0.278

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonC. diff
20170.6670.5041.6390.000
20183.0770.5142.7350.343
20191.9490.7370.5200.356
20211.9223.8440.0000.230
20220.9200.0001.5740.000
20230.9641.1610.085
20240.7390.0000.278

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Kentucky, its score is higher than 45% of the other 55 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 6 of the 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 38% (Kentucky).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Kentucky: CMS cut 21 of 56 (38%); middle score 0.1861Kentucky 56 hospitals38% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.1739 This hospital 0.1739 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Kentucky: CMS cut 21 of 56 (38%); middle score 0.1861Kentucky56 hospitals38% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.1739 This hospital 0.1739

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045363%
South region1,17426322%−0.105666%
Kentucky562138%0.186145%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105365%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073264%
For-profit6519815%−0.259074%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057465%
This hospital0.1739
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Tristar Hendersonville Medical Center, Hendersonville: score −0.8045, not cut, 46 miles87. Owensboro Health Muhlenberg Community Hospital, Greenville: score 0.1128, not cut, 44 miles76. Highpoint Health-Sumner With Ascension Saint Thoma, Gallatin: score 0.2861, not cut, 40 miles65. Tristar Northcrest Medical Center, Springfield: score −1.1363, not cut, 37 miles54. Owensboro Health Twin Lakes Medical Center, Leitchfield: score 0.2749, not cut, 36 miles43. T J Samson Community Hospital, Glasgow: score −1.0950, not cut, 30 miles32. The Medical Center at Russellville, Russellville: score 0.1916, not cut, 26 miles21. The Medical Center (Bowling Green), Bowling Green: score 0.5805, cut, 2 miles1This hospital: Tristar Greenview Regional Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
The Medical Center (Bowling Green), Bowling Green, KY20.5805cut
The Medical Center at Russellville, Russellville, KY260.1916not cut
T J Samson Community Hospital, Glasgow, KY30−1.0950not cut
Owensboro Health Twin Lakes Medical Center, Leitchfield, KY360.2749not cut
Tristar Northcrest Medical Center, Springfield, TN37−1.1363not cut
Highpoint Health-Sumner With Ascension Saint Thoma, Gallatin, TN400.2861not cut
Owensboro Health Muhlenberg Community Hospital, Greenville, KY440.1128not cut
Tristar Hendersonville Medical Center, Hendersonville, TN46−0.8045not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1The Medical Center (Bowling Green)Bowling Green, KY20.58051% cut$628KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
2The Medical Center at RussellvilleRussellville, KY260.1916No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 2 measures
3T J Samson Community HospitalGlasgow, KY30−1.0950No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
4Owensboro Health Twin Lakes Medical CenterLeitchfield, KY360.2749No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 3 measures
5Tristar Northcrest Medical CenterSpringfield, TN37−1.1363No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 5 measures
6Highpoint Health-Sumner With Ascension Saint ThomaGallatin, TN400.2861No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
7Owensboro Health Muhlenberg Community HospitalGreenville, KY440.1128No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 3 measures
8Tristar Hendersonville Medical CenterHendersonville, TN46−0.8045No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Tristar Greenview Regional Hospital, Bowling Green, KY: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/180124/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.