P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSpencer Municipal Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: +$24K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 160112

1Hospital

Spencer Municipal Hospital

2Location

Spencer, IA (Iowa’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 51301

Clay County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 93 beds · Government · Rural · Medicare-dependent hospital

4Care Compare stars

4 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.7954

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$101K estimate
Likely $72⁠–⁠113K; about $140 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$101K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7954 for Spencer Municipal Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $10.1M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $140 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $72–113K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7954 This hospital 0.7954 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7954 This hospital 0.7954

Higher than 89% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 5 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 4 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.3507, to 0.4447. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 4 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 84% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1344

    Z-score1.0187

    Part of score+0.2547

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 87% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.071

    Z-score1.2630

    Part of score+0.3158

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 80% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.343

    Z-score0.8441

    Part of score+0.2110

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 57% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.392

    Z-score0.0557

    Part of score+0.0139

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.13440.96231.0187+0.2547Worse than 84% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTI1.0710.4891.2630+0.3158Worse than 87% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.3430.7950.8441+0.2110Worse than 80% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.3920.3460.0557+0.0139Worse than 57% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 4; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.0187PSI 90+1.2630CAUTI+0.8441SSI+0.0557CDI)÷4measures=0.7954Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.4162 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.7954, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.0187 divided by 4 = +0.2547PSI 90+0.2547 CAUTI: z‑score 1.2630 divided by 4 = +0.3158CAUTI+0.3158 SSI: z‑score 0.8441 divided by 4 = +0.2110SSI+0.2110 CDI: z‑score 0.0557 divided by 4 = +0.0139CDI+0.0139 Total HAC Score: 0.7954Score0.7954 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.0187 divided by 4 = +0.2547PSI 90+0.2547 CAUTI: z‑score 1.2630 divided by 4 = +0.3158CAUTI+0.3158 SSI: z‑score 0.8441 divided by 4 = +0.2110SSI+0.2110 CDI: z‑score 0.0557 divided by 4 = +0.0139CDI+0.0139 Total HAC Score: 0.7954Score0.7954 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.0187+0.25470.2547
CAUTI1.2630+0.31580.5705
SSI0.8441+0.21100.7815
CDI0.0557+0.01390.7954
Total HAC Score0.7954
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.4162 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $101K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $101K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $101K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7954 This hospital 0.7954 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $101K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $101Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7954 This hospital 0.7954

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$100,595
This hospital0.7954−$100,595
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$100,595

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($9,934,917payment−$30,329readmissions+$154,888value-based)×1%the cut=$100,595HAC cut

$100,595HAC cut÷721traditional Medicare stays=$140per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $101K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$30K and +$155K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates $7,220,152
Medicare-dependent hospital add-on $362,047
Base payment the base $7,582,199
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $58,989
Outliers: unusually costly stays $32,274
Low-volume adjustment $1,503,585
Capital: buildings and equipment $557,329
Uncompensated care $200,541
Total, before the three programs $9,934,917
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9960 − 1) −$30,329
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0204 − 1) +$154,888
After these two $10,059,476
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $72⁠–⁠113K −$100,595
Net of the three programs likely $17⁠–⁠25K +$23,964

Not paid to this hospital: teaching payments and a sole community hospital rate difference.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates$7,220,152
Medicare-dependent hospital add-on$362,047
Base payment (the base)$7,582,199
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$58,989
Outliers: unusually costly stays$32,274
Low-volume adjustment$1,503,585
Capital: buildings and equipment$557,329
Uncompensated care$200,541
Total, before the three programs$9,934,917
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9960 − 1))−$30,329
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0204 − 1))+$154,888
After these two$10,059,476
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $72–113K)−$100,595
Net of the three programs (likely $17–25K)+$23,964

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.7954same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$101Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7954 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $101K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.8958 or lower
CAUTI0.380 or lower
SSI0.371 or lower
CDInot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 4 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1344 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1745

CMS 1.071 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0603

CMS 1.343 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0428

CMS 0.392 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0968

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.7954 among its measured results: +0.3158.
  • PSI 90 +0.2547
  • CAUTI +0.3158
  • SSI +0.2110
  • CDI +0.0139

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 4, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.0187+0.2547same
CAUTI1.2630+0.3158same
SSI0.8441+0.2110same
CDI0.0557+0.0139same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 5 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.0000, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.2500, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.4000, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.2189, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.5398, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.3704, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.1623, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.6223, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.6429, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.7577, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.7954, higher than 89% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.0000, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.2500, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.4000, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.2189, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.5398, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.3704, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.1623, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.6223, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.6429, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.7577, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.7954, higher than 89% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20152.00004.7%not cut
FY20166.250064.4%not cut
FY20175.400049.8%not cut
FY20180.218967.9%not cut
FY20190.539882.8%cut
FY20200.370477.1%cut
FY20210.162365.3%not cut
FY2022−0.622314.9%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.642984.5%cut
FY20250.757789.5%cut
FY20260.795489.8%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 2 infection measures ended lower than they started.
SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.000 C. diff 1.38 → 0.46 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.376C. diff, 2018: 0.983C. diff, 2019: 0.621C. diff, 2021: 0.750C. diff, 2022: 1.240C. diff, 2023: 0.343C. diff, 2024: 0.456 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.000 C. diff 1.38 → 0.46 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.376C. diff, 2018: 0.983C. diff, 2019: 0.621C. diff, 2021: 0.750C. diff, 2022: 1.240C. diff, 2023: 0.343C. diff, 2024: 0.456

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearSSI, hysterectomyC. diff
20170.0001.376
20180.0000.983
20190.0000.621
20210.750
20221.240
20230.343
20240.456

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Iowa, its score is higher than 68% of the other 29 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 25% (All hospitals) to 53% (Iowa).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Iowa: CMS cut 16 of 30 (53%); middle score 0.3970Iowa 30 hospitals53% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government 401 hospitals35% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.7954 This hospital 0.7954 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Iowa: CMS cut 16 of 30 (53%); middle score 0.3970Iowa30 hospitals53% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government401 hospitals35% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.7954 This hospital 0.7954

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045389%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026890%
Iowa301653%0.397068%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105387%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115482%
Government40114035%0.160281%
Rural61919632%0.022982%
This hospital0.7954
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 5 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 19 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center, Sioux Falls: score 0.3618, not cut, 83 miles87. Dunes Surgical Hospital, Dakota Dunes: score −0.6357, not cut, 82 miles76. MercyOne Siouxland Medical Center, Sioux City: score 0.8012, cut, 78 miles65. St Lukes Regional Medical Center, Sioux City: score 0.6377, cut, 77 miles54. Trinity Regional Medical Center, Fort Dodge: score 0.8681, cut, 66 miles43. Mayo Clinic Health System - Fairmont, Fairmont: score −0.2527, not cut, 48 miles32. Sanford Worthington Medical Center, Worthington: score 1.1398, cut, 40 miles21. Lakes Regional Healthcare, Spirit Lake: score 0.4133, cut, 19 miles1This hospital: Spencer Municipal Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Lakes Regional Healthcare, Spirit Lake, IA190.4133cut
Sanford Worthington Medical Center, Worthington, MN401.1398cut
Mayo Clinic Health System - Fairmont, Fairmont, MN48−0.2527not cut
Trinity Regional Medical Center, Fort Dodge, IA660.8681cut
St Lukes Regional Medical Center, Sioux City, IA770.6377cut
MercyOne Siouxland Medical Center, Sioux City, IA780.8012cut
Dunes Surgical Hospital, Dakota Dunes, SD82−0.6357not cut
Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center, Sioux Falls, SD830.3618not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Lakes Regional HealthcareSpirit Lake, IA190.41331% cut$48KAbove the national median on 2 of 3 measures
2Sanford Worthington Medical CenterWorthington, MN401.13981% cut$34KAbove the national median on 2 of 2 measures
3Mayo Clinic Health System - FairmontFairmont, MN48−0.2527No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures
4Trinity Regional Medical CenterFort Dodge, IA660.86811% cut$155KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5St Lukes Regional Medical CenterSioux City, IA770.63771% cut$291KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
6MercyOne Siouxland Medical CenterSioux City, IA780.80121% cut$303KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Dunes Surgical HospitalDakota Dunes, SD82−0.6357No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
8Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health CenterSioux Falls, SD830.3618No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Spencer Municipal Hospital, Spencer, IA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/160112/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.