P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSarah Bush Lincoln Health Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$539K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 140189

1Hospital

Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center

2Location

Mattoon, IL (Illinois’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 61938

Coles County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 203 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.8314

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$320K estimate
Likely $249⁠–⁠390K; about $123 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$320K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.8314 for Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $32.0M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $123 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $249–390K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.8314 This hospital 0.8314 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.8314 This hospital 0.8314

Higher than 90% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 8 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.4210, to 0.4104. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 55% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9723

    Z-score−0.1126

    Part of score−0.0188

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 72% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.829

    Z-score0.5166

    Part of score+0.0861

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.963

    Z-score2.3863

    Part of score+0.3977

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 53% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.739

    Z-score−0.1906

    Part of score−0.0318

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 74% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.523

    Z-score0.5629

    Part of score+0.0938

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 92% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.571

    Z-score1.8259

    Part of score+0.3043

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.97230.9623−0.1126−0.0188Worse than 55% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.8290.5590.5166+0.0861Worse than 72% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI1.9630.4892.3863+0.3977Worse than 97% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.7390.795−0.1906−0.0318Better than 53% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.5230.3460.5629+0.0938Worse than 74% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.5710.6411.8259+0.3043Worse than 92% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.1126PSI 90+0.5166CLABSI+2.3863CAUTI−0.1906SSI+0.5629CDI+1.8259MRSA)÷6measures=0.8314Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.4522 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.8314, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1126 divided by 6 = −0.0188PSI 90−0.0188 CLABSI: z‑score 0.5166 divided by 6 = +0.0861CLABSI+0.0861 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 6 = +0.3977CAUTI+0.3977 SSI: z‑score −0.1906 divided by 6 = −0.0318SSI−0.0318 CDI: z‑score 0.5629 divided by 6 = +0.0938CDI+0.0938 MRSA: z‑score 1.8259 divided by 6 = +0.3043MRSA+0.3043 Total HAC Score: 0.8314Score0.8314 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1126 divided by 6 = −0.0188PSI 90−0.0188 CLABSI: z‑score 0.5166 divided by 6 = +0.0861CLABSI+0.0861 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 6 = +0.3977CAUTI+0.3977 SSI: z‑score −0.1906 divided by 6 = −0.0318SSI−0.0318 CDI: z‑score 0.5629 divided by 6 = +0.0938CDI+0.0938 MRSA: z‑score 1.8259 divided by 6 = +0.3043MRSA+0.3043 Total HAC Score: 0.8314Score0.8314 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.1126−0.0188−0.0188
CLABSI0.5166+0.08610.0673
CAUTI2.3863+0.39770.4650
SSI−0.1906−0.03180.4332
CDI0.5629+0.09380.5270
MRSA1.8259+0.30430.8313
Total HAC Score0.8314
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.4522 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $320K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $320K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $320K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.8314 This hospital 0.8314 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $320K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $320Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.8314 This hospital 0.8314

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$320,104
This hospital0.8314−$320,104
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$320,104

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($32,229,690payment−$339,448readmissions+$120,120value-based)×1%the cut=$320,104HAC cut

$320,104HAC cut÷2,599traditional Medicare stays=$123per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $320K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$339K and +$120K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $27,155,807
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $492,063
Outliers: unusually costly stays $498,309
Capital: buildings and equipment $2,132,090
Uncompensated care $1,951,421
Total, before the three programs $32,229,690
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9875 − 1) −$339,448
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0044 − 1) +$120,120
After these two $32,010,362
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $249⁠–⁠390K −$320,104
Net of the three programs likely −$625K to −$431K −$539,432

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$27,155,807
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$492,063
Outliers: unusually costly stays$498,309
Capital: buildings and equipment$2,132,090
Uncompensated care$1,951,421
Total, before the three programs$32,229,690
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9875 − 1))−$339,448
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0044 − 1))+$120,120
After these two$32,010,362
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $249–390K)−$320,104
Net of the three programs (likely −$625K to −$431K)−$539,432

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.8314same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$320Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.8314 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $320K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTI0.411 or lower
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSA0.272 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9723 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.829 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 1.963 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.739 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.523 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.571 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.8314 among its measured results: +0.3977.
  • PSI 90 −0.0188
  • CLABSI +0.0861
  • CAUTI +0.3977
  • SSI −0.0318
  • CDI +0.0938
  • MRSA +0.3043

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.1126−0.0188same
CLABSI0.5166+0.0861same
CAUTI2.3863+0.3977same
SSI−0.1906−0.0318same
CDI0.5629+0.0938same
MRSA1.8259+0.3043same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 8 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 9.3000, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.0800, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.6647, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.8888, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.2258, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.2657, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.4526, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.9799, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.1672, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.8314, higher than 90% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 9.3000, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.0800, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.6647, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.8888, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.2258, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.2657, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.4526, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.9799, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.1672, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.8314, higher than 90% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20159.300097.8%cut
FY20166.000056.2%not cut
FY20177.080084.0%cut
FY20180.664787.7%cut
FY20190.888892.8%cut
FY20200.225869.1%not cut
FY20210.265771.1%not cut
FY20220.452681.7%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.979992.4%cut
FY20251.167296.1%cut
FY20260.831490.6%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 0.99 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 1.155CLABSI, 2021: 1.479CLABSI, 2022: 1.654CLABSI, 2023: 0.714CLABSI, 2024: 0.989 CAUTI 1.96 → 2.16 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.962CAUTI, 2018: 1.059CAUTI, 2019: 2.812CAUTI, 2021: 2.915CAUTI, 2022: 2.164CAUTI, 2023: 1.740CAUTI, 2024: 2.161 SSI, colon 0.76 → 0.50 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.763SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 2.021SSI, colon, 2022: 1.753SSI, colon, 2023: 0.742SSI, colon, 2024: 0.500 MRSA 0.00 → 0.50 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.580MRSA, 2022: 0.480MRSA, 2023: 2.732MRSA, 2024: 0.503 C. diff 1.14 → 0.46 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.143C. diff, 2018: 0.648C. diff, 2019: 0.284C. diff, 2021: 0.632C. diff, 2022: 0.422C. diff, 2023: 0.603C. diff, 2024: 0.461 CLABSI 0.00 → 0.99 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 1.155CLABSI, 2021: 1.479CLABSI, 2022: 1.654CLABSI, 2023: 0.714CLABSI, 2024: 0.989 CAUTI 1.96 → 2.16 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.962CAUTI, 2018: 1.059CAUTI, 2019: 2.812CAUTI, 2021: 2.915CAUTI, 2022: 2.164CAUTI, 2023: 1.740CAUTI, 2024: 2.161 SSI, colon 0.76 → 0.50 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.763SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 2.021SSI, colon, 2022: 1.753SSI, colon, 2023: 0.742SSI, colon, 2024: 0.500 MRSA 0.00 → 0.50 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.580MRSA, 2022: 0.480MRSA, 2023: 2.732MRSA, 2024: 0.503 C. diff 1.14 → 0.46 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.143C. diff, 2018: 0.648C. diff, 2019: 0.284C. diff, 2021: 0.632C. diff, 2022: 0.422C. diff, 2023: 0.603C. diff, 2024: 0.461

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.0001.9620.7631.143
20180.0001.0590.0000.648
20191.1552.8120.0000.0000.284
20211.4792.9152.0210.5800.632
20221.6542.1641.7530.4800.422
20230.7141.7400.7422.7320.603
20240.9892.1610.5000.5030.461

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Illinois, its score is higher than 88% of the other 111 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (100 to 299 beds) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Illinois: CMS cut 31 of 112 (28%); middle score 0.0528Illinois 112 hospitals28% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.8314 This hospital 0.8314 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Illinois: CMS cut 31 of 112 (28%); middle score 0.0528Illinois112 hospitals28% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.8314 This hospital 0.8314

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045390%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026891%
Illinois1123128%0.052888%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105388%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073293%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013491%
Rural61919632%0.022983%
This hospital0.8314
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 29 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. OSF Sacred Heart Medical Center, Danville: score 0.5716, cut, 56 miles87. Union Hospital Inc, Terre Haute: score −0.3498, not cut, 47 miles76. Terre Haute Regional Hospital, Terre Haute: score −0.2646, not cut, 47 miles65. Decatur Memorial Hospital, Decatur: score −0.2150, not cut, 45 miles54. Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana: score −0.3020, not cut, 44 miles43. OSF Heart of Mary Medical Center, Urbana: score 0.3745, not cut, 44 miles32. St Marys Hospital, Decatur: score 0.4827, cut, 42 miles21. St Anthonys Memorial Hospital, Effingham: score 0.2081, not cut, 29 miles1This hospital: Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
St Anthonys Memorial Hospital, Effingham, IL290.2081not cut
St Marys Hospital, Decatur, IL420.4827cut
OSF Heart of Mary Medical Center, Urbana, IL440.3745not cut
Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL44−0.3020not cut
Decatur Memorial Hospital, Decatur, IL45−0.2150not cut
Terre Haute Regional Hospital, Terre Haute, IN47−0.2646not cut
Union Hospital Inc, Terre Haute, IN47−0.3498not cut
OSF Sacred Heart Medical Center, Danville, IL560.5716cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1St Anthonys Memorial HospitalEffingham, IL290.2081No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2St Marys HospitalDecatur, IL420.48271% cut$126KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3OSF Heart of Mary Medical CenterUrbana, IL440.3745No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4Carle Foundation HospitalUrbana, IL44−0.3020No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5Decatur Memorial HospitalDecatur, IL45−0.2150No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
6Terre Haute Regional HospitalTerre Haute, IN47−0.2646No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
7Union Hospital IncTerre Haute, IN47−0.3498No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8OSF Sacred Heart Medical CenterDanville, IL560.57161% cut$93KAbove the national median on 4 of 5 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center, Mattoon, IL: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/140189/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.