P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalGraham Hospital Association Estimated FY2026 net: −$114K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 140001

1Hospital

Graham Hospital Association

2Location

Canton, IL (Illinois’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 61520

Fulton County

3Type

100 beds · Nonprofit

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.6376

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

Likely $60⁠–⁠94K; about $147 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$84K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6376 for Graham Hospital Association and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $8.4M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $147 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $60–94K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6376 This hospital 0.6376 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6376 This hospital 0.6376

Higher than 85% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 4 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CDI down to the national median (0.346) would lower the score the most: by 0.5789, to 0.0587. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 4 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; CDI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 78% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8803

    Z-score−0.7550

    Part of score−0.1888

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 91% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.246

    Z-score1.6849

    Part of score+0.4212

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 68% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.516

    Z-score−0.5726

    Part of score−0.1432

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 95% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.951

    Z-score2.1931

    Part of score+0.5483

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.88030.9623−0.7550−0.1888Better than 78% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTI1.2460.4891.6849+0.4212Worse than 91% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.5160.795−0.5726−0.1432Better than 68% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.9510.3462.1931+0.5483Worse than 95% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 4; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.7550PSI 90+1.6849CAUTI−0.5726SSI+2.1931CDI)÷4measures=0.6376Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2584 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.6376, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.7550 divided by 4 = −0.1888PSI 90−0.1888 CAUTI: z‑score 1.6849 divided by 4 = +0.4212CAUTI+0.4212 SSI: z‑score −0.5726 divided by 4 = −0.1432SSI−0.1432 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 4 = +0.5483CDI+0.5483 Total HAC Score: 0.6376Score0.6376 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.7550 divided by 4 = −0.1888PSI 90−0.1888 CAUTI: z‑score 1.6849 divided by 4 = +0.4212CAUTI+0.4212 SSI: z‑score −0.5726 divided by 4 = −0.1432SSI−0.1432 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 4 = +0.5483CDI+0.5483 Total HAC Score: 0.6376Score0.6376 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.7550−0.1888−0.1888
CAUTI1.6849+0.42120.2324
SSI−0.5726−0.14320.0892
CDI2.1931+0.54830.6375
Total HAC Score0.6376
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2584 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $84K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $84K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $84K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6376 This hospital 0.6376 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $84K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $84Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6376 This hospital 0.6376

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$84,177
This hospital0.6376−$84,177
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$84,177

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($8,447,650payment−$6,955readmissions−$22,991value-based)×1%the cut=$84,177HAC cut

$84,177HAC cut÷572traditional Medicare stays=$147per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $84K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$7K and −$23K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $5,795,857
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $104,325
Outliers: unusually costly stays $213,577
Low-volume adjustment $1,191,260
Capital: buildings and equipment $463,876
Uncompensated care $678,755
Total, before the three programs $8,447,650
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9988 − 1) −$6,955
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9960 − 1) −$22,991
After these two $8,417,704
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $60⁠–⁠94K −$84,177
Net of the three programs likely −$121K to −$79K −$114,123

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, and a sole community hospital rate difference.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$5,795,857
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$104,325
Outliers: unusually costly stays$213,577
Low-volume adjustment$1,191,260
Capital: buildings and equipment$463,876
Uncompensated care$678,755
Total, before the three programs$8,447,650
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9988 − 1))−$6,955
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9960 − 1))−$22,991
After these two$8,417,704
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $60–94K)−$84,177
Net of the three programs (likely −$121K to −$79K)−$114,123

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.6376same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$84Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6376 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $84K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CAUTI0.817 or lower
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDI0.677 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 4 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8803 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1745

CMS 1.246 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0603

CMS 0.516 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0428

CMS 0.951 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0968

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CDI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.6376 among its measured results: +0.5483.
  • PSI 90 −0.1888
  • CAUTI +0.4212
  • SSI −0.1432
  • CDI +0.5483

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 4, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.7550−0.1888same
CAUTI1.6849+0.4212same
SSI−0.5726−0.1432same
CDI2.1931+0.5483same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.0000, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.6250, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.3625, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.8707, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.5547, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4851, higher than 20% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1790, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1374, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.1066, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.9766, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6376, higher than 85% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.0000, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.6250, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.3625, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.8707, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.5547, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4851, higher than 20% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1790, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1374, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.1066, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.9766, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6376, higher than 85% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20151.00000.0%not cut
FY20163.625019.3%not cut
FY20174.362531.6%not cut
FY2018−0.870710.4%not cut
FY2019−0.554719.2%not cut
FY2020−0.485120.7%not cut
FY2021−0.179038.7%not cut
FY2022−0.137441.5%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.106660.5%not cut
FY20250.976693.7%cut
FY20260.637685.0%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 2 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CAUTI 2.30 → 1.38 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2022: 2.304CAUTI, 2023: 1.376 C. diff 0.76 → 0.62 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.761C. diff, 2018: 1.117C. diff, 2019: 0.700C. diff, 2021: 1.033C. diff, 2022: 0.349C. diff, 2023: 1.300C. diff, 2024: 0.619 CAUTI 2.30 → 1.38 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2022: 2.304CAUTI, 2023: 1.376 C. diff 0.76 → 0.62 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.761C. diff, 2018: 1.117C. diff, 2019: 0.700C. diff, 2021: 1.033C. diff, 2022: 0.349C. diff, 2023: 1.300C. diff, 2024: 0.619

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCAUTIC. diff
20170.761
20181.117
20190.700
20211.033
20222.3040.349
20231.3761.300
20240.619

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Illinois, its score is higher than 81% of the other 111 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 5 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (100 to 299 beds) to 28% (Illinois).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Illinois: CMS cut 31 of 112 (28%); middle score 0.0528Illinois 112 hospitals28% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.6376 This hospital 0.6376 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Illinois: CMS cut 31 of 112 (28%); middle score 0.0528Illinois112 hospitals28% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.6376 This hospital 0.6376

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045385%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026884%
Illinois1123128%0.052881%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073287%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013484%
This hospital0.6376
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 21 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Memorial Medical Center, Springfield: score 0.7218, cut, 55 miles87. Carle Bromenn Medical Center, Normal: score 0.2288, not cut, 55 miles76. St Mary Medical Center, Galesburg: score 0.1315, not cut, 35 miles65. McDonough District Hospital, Macomb: score 0.0448, not cut, 34 miles54. Carle Health Proctor Hospital, Peoria: score −0.5367, not cut, 27 miles43. Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria: score 0.5231, cut, 26 miles32. Carle Health Methodist Hospital, Peoria: score 0.1465, not cut, 25 miles21. Carle Health Pekin Hospital, Pekin: score 0.6141, cut, 21 miles1This hospital: Graham Hospital Association

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Carle Health Pekin Hospital, Pekin, IL210.6141cut
Carle Health Methodist Hospital, Peoria, IL250.1465not cut
Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, IL260.5231cut
Carle Health Proctor Hospital, Peoria, IL27−0.5367not cut
McDonough District Hospital, Macomb, IL340.0448not cut
St Mary Medical Center, Galesburg, IL350.1315not cut
Carle Bromenn Medical Center, Normal, IL550.2288not cut
Memorial Medical Center, Springfield, IL550.7218cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Carle Health Pekin HospitalPekin, IL210.61411% cut$53KAbove the national median on 2 of 3 measures
2Carle Health Methodist HospitalPeoria, IL250.1465No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Saint Francis Medical CenterPeoria, IL260.52311% cut$1.8MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
4Carle Health Proctor HospitalPeoria, IL27−0.5367No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 4 measures
5McDonough District HospitalMacomb, IL340.0448No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 2 measures
6St Mary Medical CenterGalesburg, IL350.1315No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
7Carle Bromenn Medical CenterNormal, IL550.2288No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Memorial Medical CenterSpringfield, IL550.72181% cut$1.2MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Graham Hospital Association, Canton, IL: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/140001/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.