P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalHCA Florida Putnam Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$188K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 100232

1Hospital

HCA Florida Putnam Hospital

2Location

Palatka, FL (Florida’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 32177

Putnam County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 99 beds · For-profit · Rural · Medicare-dependent hospital · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.3408

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $153K, likely $110⁠–⁠172K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3408 for HCA Florida Putnam Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $153K estimate 1% of about $15.3M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.0391 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $110–172K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3408 This hospital 0.3408 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3408 This hospital 0.3408

Higher than 72% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing MRSA down to the national median (0.641) would lower the score the most: by 0.3232, to 0.0176. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 59% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9811

    Z-score−0.0514

    Part of score−0.0086

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 81% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.991

    Z-score0.8924

    Part of score+0.1487

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 67% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.330

    Z-score−0.5231

    Part of score−0.0872

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 76% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.253

    Z-score0.6899

    Part of score+0.1150

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 76% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.175

    Z-score−0.7845

    Part of score−0.1308

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 92% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.569

    Z-score1.8218

    Part of score+0.3036

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.98110.9623−0.0514−0.0086Worse than 59% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.9910.5590.8924+0.1487Worse than 81% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.3300.489−0.5231−0.0872Better than 67% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.2530.7950.6899+0.1150Worse than 76% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.1750.346−0.7845−0.1308Better than 76% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.5690.6411.8218+0.3036Worse than 92% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.0514PSI 90+0.8924CLABSI−0.5231CAUTI+0.6899SSI−0.7845CDI+1.8218MRSA)÷6measures=0.3408Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make 0.3409; CMS reports 0.3408. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.0391 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.3408, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.0514 divided by 6 = −0.0086PSI 90−0.0086 CLABSI: z‑score 0.8924 divided by 6 = +0.1487CLABSI+0.1487 CAUTI: z‑score −0.5231 divided by 6 = −0.0872CAUTI−0.0872 SSI: z‑score 0.6899 divided by 6 = +0.1150SSI+0.1150 CDI: z‑score −0.7845 divided by 6 = −0.1308CDI−0.1308 MRSA: z‑score 1.8218 divided by 6 = +0.3036MRSA+0.3036 Total HAC Score: 0.3408Score0.3408 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.0514 divided by 6 = −0.0086PSI 90−0.0086 CLABSI: z‑score 0.8924 divided by 6 = +0.1487CLABSI+0.1487 CAUTI: z‑score −0.5231 divided by 6 = −0.0872CAUTI−0.0872 SSI: z‑score 0.6899 divided by 6 = +0.1150SSI+0.1150 CDI: z‑score −0.7845 divided by 6 = −0.1308CDI−0.1308 MRSA: z‑score 1.8218 divided by 6 = +0.3036MRSA+0.3036 Total HAC Score: 0.3408Score0.3408 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.0514−0.0086−0.0086
CLABSI0.8924+0.14870.1401
CAUTI−0.5231−0.08720.0529
SSI0.6899+0.11500.1679
CDI−0.7845−0.13080.0371
MRSA1.8218+0.30360.3407
Total HAC Score0.3408
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0391 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.0391 higher, the cut would have been about $153K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $153K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $153K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3408 This hospital 0.3408 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $153K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $153Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3408 This hospital 0.3408

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$153,356
This hospital0.3408$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$153,356

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($15,523,959payment−$96,448readmissions−$91,910value-based)×1%the cut=$153,356at stake

$153,356at stake÷1,262traditional Medicare stays=$122per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $153K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$96K and −$92K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $12,690,533
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $212,440
Capital: buildings and equipment $985,803
Uncompensated care $1,635,183
Total, before the three programs $15,523,959
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9924 − 1) −$96,448
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9928 − 1) −$91,910
After these two $15,335,601
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $153,356 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$199K to −$131K −$188,358

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, outlier payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$12,690,533
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$212,440
Capital: buildings and equipment$985,803
Uncompensated care$1,635,183
Total, before the three programs$15,523,959
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9924 − 1))−$96,448
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9928 − 1))−$91,910
After these two$15,335,601
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $153,356)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$199K to −$131K)−$188,358

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.3408same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3408 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $153K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.0140
CLABSIup to 1.090
CAUTIup to 0.425
SSIup to 1.387
CDIup to 0.234
MRSAup to 1.679

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9811 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.991 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.330 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.253 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.175 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.569 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.3408 among its measured results: +0.3036.
  • PSI 90 −0.0086
  • CLABSI +0.1487
  • CAUTI −0.0872
  • SSI +0.1150
  • CDI −0.1308
  • MRSA +0.3036

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.0514−0.0086same
CLABSI0.8924+0.1487same
CAUTI−0.5231−0.0872same
SSI0.6899+0.1150same
CDI−0.7845−0.1308same
MRSA1.8218+0.3036same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.2000, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 7.5000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.8500, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.3218, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2391, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.2175, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1084, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.0897, higher than 61% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.1645, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0501, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.3408, higher than 72% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.2000, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 7.5000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.8500, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.3218, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2391, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.2175, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1084, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.0897, higher than 61% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.1645, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0501, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.3408, higher than 72% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.200062.5%not cut
FY20167.500083.9%cut
FY20177.850092.5%cut
FY20180.321873.5%not cut
FY20190.239169.0%not cut
FY20200.217568.8%not cut
FY2021−0.108443.2%not cut
FY20220.089761.5%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.164540.9%not cut
FY20250.050156.1%not cut
FY20260.340872.5%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 2.10 → 0.70 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.100CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 1.629CLABSI, 2021: 0.500CLABSI, 2022: 0.838CLABSI, 2023: 1.244CLABSI, 2024: 0.705 CAUTI 0.40 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.402CAUTI, 2018: 0.396CAUTI, 2019: 0.925CAUTI, 2021: 0.438CAUTI, 2022: 1.391CAUTI, 2023: 0.649CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 1.00 → 1.97 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2018: 0.996MRSA, 2019: 0.688MRSA, 2021: 1.717MRSA, 2023: 1.974 C. diff 0.70 → 0.23 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.699C. diff, 2018: 1.163C. diff, 2019: 0.474C. diff, 2021: 0.413C. diff, 2022: 0.112C. diff, 2023: 0.119C. diff, 2024: 0.229 CLABSI 2.10 → 0.70 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.100CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 1.629CLABSI, 2021: 0.500CLABSI, 2022: 0.838CLABSI, 2023: 1.244CLABSI, 2024: 0.705 CAUTI 0.40 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.402CAUTI, 2018: 0.396CAUTI, 2019: 0.925CAUTI, 2021: 0.438CAUTI, 2022: 1.391CAUTI, 2023: 0.649CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 1.00 → 1.97 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2018: 0.996MRSA, 2019: 0.688MRSA, 2021: 1.717MRSA, 2023: 1.974 C. diff 0.70 → 0.23 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.699C. diff, 2018: 1.163C. diff, 2019: 0.474C. diff, 2021: 0.413C. diff, 2022: 0.112C. diff, 2023: 0.119C. diff, 2024: 0.229

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIMRSAC. diff
20172.1000.4020.699
20180.0000.3960.9961.163
20191.6290.9250.6880.474
20210.5000.4381.7170.413
20220.8381.3910.112
20231.2440.6491.9740.119
20240.7050.0000.229

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Florida, its score is higher than 87% of the other 164 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 11% (Florida) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Florida: CMS cut 18 of 165 (11%); middle score −0.1935Florida 165 hospitals11% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.3408 This hospital 0.3408 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Florida: CMS cut 18 of 165 (11%); middle score −0.1935Florida165 hospitals11% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.3408 This hospital 0.3408

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045372%
South region1,17426322%−0.105675%
Florida1651811%−0.193587%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105373%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115470%
For-profit6519815%−0.259082%
Rural61919632%0.022966%
This hospital0.3408
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut none of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 27 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Marion Communtiy Hospital, Ocala: score −0.4425, not cut, 42 miles87. UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville: score −0.0648, not cut, 39 miles76. HCA Florida Orange Park Hospital, Orange Park: score −0.0022, not cut, 36 miles65. Ascension St Vincent's Clay County, Middleburg: score −0.5465, not cut, 33 miles54. AdventHealth Palm Coast, Palm Coast: score 0.1300, not cut, 32 miles43. Ascension St Vincent's St Johns County, St. Johns: score −0.8982, not cut, 31 miles32. AdventHealth Palm Coast Parkway, Palm Coast: score −1.3281, not cut, 28 miles21. Flagler Hospital, Saint Augustine: score 0.0921, not cut, 27 miles1This hospital: HCA Florida Putnam Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Flagler Hospital, Saint Augustine, FL270.0921not cut
AdventHealth Palm Coast Parkway, Palm Coast, FL28−1.3281not cut
Ascension St Vincent's St Johns County, St. Johns, FL31−0.8982not cut
AdventHealth Palm Coast, Palm Coast, FL320.1300not cut
Ascension St Vincent's Clay County, Middleburg, FL33−0.5465not cut
HCA Florida Orange Park Hospital, Orange Park, FL36−0.0022not cut
UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, FL39−0.0648not cut
Marion Communtiy Hospital, Ocala, FL42−0.4425not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Flagler HospitalSaint Augustine, FL270.0921No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2AdventHealth Palm Coast ParkwayPalm Coast, FL28−1.3281No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures
3Ascension St Vincent's St Johns CountySt. Johns, FL31−0.8982No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures
4AdventHealth Palm CoastPalm Coast, FL320.1300No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5Ascension St Vincent's Clay CountyMiddleburg, FL33−0.5465No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
6HCA Florida Orange Park HospitalOrange Park, FL36−0.0022No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7UF Health Shands HospitalGainesville, FL39−0.0648No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Marion Communtiy HospitalOcala, FL42−0.4425No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. HCA Florida Putnam Hospital, Palatka, FL: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/100232/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.