P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalAnaheim Global Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$34K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050744

1Hospital

Anaheim Global Medical Center

2Location

Anaheim, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 92805

Orange County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 184 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.6251

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$34K estimate
Likely $26⁠–⁠43K; about $193 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$34K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6251 for Anaheim Global Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $3.4M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $193 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $26–43K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6251 This hospital 0.6251 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6251 This hospital 0.6251

Higher than 84% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 3 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.0114, to 0.6137. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 3 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 1.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 55% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9721

    Z-score−0.1141

    Part of score−0.0190

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4065

    Part of score−0.2344

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.3186

    Part of score−0.2198

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    CMS assigned this measure its worst possible score under the program’s rules; it is not a measured result. CMS’s footnote gives the reason.

    CMS footnote 11: There were discrepancies in the data collection process.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-score2.1717

    Part of score+0.3620

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    CMS assigned this measure its worst possible score under the program’s rules; it is not a measured result. CMS’s footnote gives the reason.

    CMS footnote 11: There were discrepancies in the data collection process.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-score2.1931

    Part of score+0.3655

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    CMS assigned this measure its worst possible score under the program’s rules; it is not a measured result. CMS’s footnote gives the reason.

    CMS footnote 11: There were discrepancies in the data collection process.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-score2.2251

    Part of score+0.3708

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.97210.9623−0.1141−0.0190Worse than 55% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.0000.559−1.4065−0.2344Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.0000.489−1.3186−0.2198Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSIno value published0.7952.1717+0.3620
CDIno value published0.3462.1931+0.3655
MRSAno value published0.6412.2251+0.3708

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.1141PSI 90−1.4065CLABSI−1.3186CAUTI+2.1717SSI+2.1931CDI+2.2251MRSA)÷6measures=0.6251Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2459 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.6251, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1141 divided by 6 = −0.0190PSI 90−0.0190 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 6 = −0.2344CLABSI−0.2344 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 6 = +0.3655CDI+0.3655 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 6 = +0.3708MRSA+0.3708 Total HAC Score: 0.6251Score0.6251 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.40.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1141 divided by 6 = −0.0190PSI 90−0.0190 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 6 = −0.2344CLABSI−0.2344 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 6 = +0.3655CDI+0.3655 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 6 = +0.3708MRSA+0.3708 Total HAC Score: 0.6251Score0.6251 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.40.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.1141−0.0190−0.0190
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2344−0.2534
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198−0.4732
SSI2.1717+0.3620−0.1112
CDI2.1931+0.36550.2543
MRSA2.2251+0.37080.6251
Total HAC Score0.6251
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2459 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $34K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $34K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $34K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6251 This hospital 0.6251 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $34K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $34Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6251 This hospital 0.6251

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$34,194
This hospital0.6251−$34,194
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$34,194

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($3,419,394payment+$0readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$34,194HAC cut

$34,194HAC cut÷177traditional Medicare stays=$193per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $34K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $2,316,841
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $250,335
Capital: buildings and equipment $204,315
Uncompensated care $647,903
Total, before the three programs $3,419,394
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $3,419,394
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $26⁠–⁠43K −$34,194
Net of the three programs likely −$40K to −$28K −$34,194

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, outlier payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$2,316,841
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$250,335
Capital: buildings and equipment$204,315
Uncompensated care$647,903
Total, before the three programs$3,419,394
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$3,419,394
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $26–43K)−$34,194
Net of the three programs (likely −$40K to −$28K)−$34,194

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.6251same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$34Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6251 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $34K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read NoNote
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSICMS assigned this measure’s score, so there is no submitted value to solve for.
CDICMS assigned this measure’s score, so there is no submitted value to solve for.
MRSACMS assigned this measure’s score, so there is no submitted value to solve for.

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9721 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.000 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.000 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS assigned this measure’s score; CMS’s footnote in the table above gives the reason. Enter a value to see the score had it been submitted.

median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS assigned this measure’s score; CMS’s footnote in the table above gives the reason. Enter a value to see the score had it been submitted.

median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

CMS assigned this measure’s score; CMS’s footnote in the table above gives the reason. Enter a value to see the score had it been submitted.

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. Each bar is one measure’s part of this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.6251: its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored.
  • PSI 90 −0.0190
  • CLABSI −0.2344
  • CAUTI −0.2198
  • SSI (assigned by CMS) +0.3620
  • CDI (assigned by CMS) +0.3655
  • MRSA (assigned by CMS) +0.3708

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.1141−0.0190same
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2344same
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198same
SSI, assigned2.1717+0.3620same
CDI, assigned2.1931+0.3655same
MRSA, assigned2.2251+0.3708same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050744/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 3 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.9000, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 8.5000, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.0200, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0198, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.9357, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2020: score −0.5147, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.9277, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.5921, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.8917, higher than 5% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.1180, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.6251, higher than 84% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.9000, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 8.5000, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.0200, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0198, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.9357, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2020: score −0.5147, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.9277, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.5921, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.8917, higher than 5% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.1180, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.6251, higher than 84% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.900072.1%not cut
FY20168.500093.7%cut
FY20176.020064.4%not cut
FY2018−0.019849.6%not cut
FY20190.935793.6%cut
FY2020−0.514719.2%not cut
FY2021−0.92776.8%not cut
FY2022−0.592116.0%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.89175.1%not cut
FY2025−0.118043.7%not cut
FY20260.625184.6%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.46 → 1.48 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.459CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 1.479 CAUTI 1.34 → 1.38 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.343CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 1.382 MRSA 0.94 → 0.56 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2019: 0.937MRSA, 2024: 0.557 C. diff 0.43 → 0.12 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.429C. diff, 2018: 0.159C. diff, 2019: 0.550C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.137C. diff, 2024: 0.124 CLABSI 1.46 → 1.48 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.459CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 1.479 CAUTI 1.34 → 1.38 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.343CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 1.382 MRSA 0.94 → 0.56 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2019: 0.937MRSA, 2024: 0.557 C. diff 0.43 → 0.12 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.429C. diff, 2018: 0.159C. diff, 2019: 0.550C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.137C. diff, 2024: 0.124

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIMRSAC. diff
20171.4591.3430.429
20180.0000.0000.159
20190.0000.0000.9370.550
20211.4791.382
20220.000
20230.137
20240.5570.124

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 85% of the other 276 scored there.

In Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA area, its score is higher than 78% of the other 23 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 38% (Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA area: CMS cut 9 of 24 (38%); middle score 0.1499Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA area24 hospitals38% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.6251 This hospital 0.6251 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA area: CMS cut 9 of 24 (38%); middle score 0.1499Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA area24 hospitals38% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.6251 This hospital 0.6251

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045384%
West region59315726%−0.030284%
California2777627%−0.021785%
Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA area24938%0.149978%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105383%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073286%
For-profit6519815%−0.259091%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057486%
This hospital0.6251
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi8. Chapman Global Medical Center, Orange: score 1.0518, cut, 5 miles87. Providence St. Jude Medical Center, Fullerton: score −0.3715, not cut, 5 miles76. West Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim: score −0.5188, not cut, 5 miles65. Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Orange County - Anaheim, Anaheim: score 0.1429, not cut, 4 miles54. Providence St. Joseph Hospital, Orange: score 0.3656, not cut, 4 miles43. Garden Grove Hospital & Medical Center, Garden Grove: score 0.4980, cut, 3 miles32. UCI Health-Orange, Orange: score −0.3883, not cut, 2 miles21. AHMC Anaheim Regional Medical Center, Anaheim: score 0.1757, not cut, 2 miles1This hospital: Anaheim Global Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
AHMC Anaheim Regional Medical Center, Anaheim, CA20.1757not cut
UCI Health-Orange, Orange, CA2−0.3883not cut
Garden Grove Hospital & Medical Center, Garden Grove, CA30.4980cut
Providence St. Joseph Hospital, Orange, CA40.3656not cut
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Orange County - Anaheim, Anaheim, CA40.1429not cut
West Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim, CA5−0.5188not cut
Providence St. Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, CA5−0.3715not cut
Chapman Global Medical Center, Orange, CA51.0518cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1AHMC Anaheim Regional Medical CenterAnaheim, CA20.1757No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2UCI Health-OrangeOrange, CA2−0.3883No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
3Garden Grove Hospital & Medical CenterGarden Grove, CA30.49801% cut$204KAbove the national median on 3 of 5 measures
4Providence St. Joseph HospitalOrange, CA40.3656No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Orange County - AnaheimAnaheim, CA40.1429No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
6West Anaheim Medical CenterAnaheim, CA5−0.5188No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
7Providence St. Jude Medical CenterFullerton, CA5−0.3715No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Chapman Global Medical CenterOrange, CA51.05181% cut$57KAbove the national median on 3 of 3 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

11
There were discrepancies in the data collection process.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Anaheim Global Medical Center, Anaheim, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050744/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.