P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalMonterey Park Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$107K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050736

1Hospital

Monterey Park Hospital

2Location

Monterey Park, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 91754

Los Angeles County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 102 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

1.3646

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$82K estimate
Likely $62⁠–⁠103K; about $170 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$82K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.3646 for Monterey Park Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $8.2M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $170 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $62–103K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.3646 This hospital 1.3646 lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.3646 This hospital 1.3646

Higher than 97% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 8 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.4210, to 0.9436. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 67% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9171

    Z-score−0.4979

    Part of score−0.0830

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 94% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.538

    Z-score2.1613

    Part of score+0.3602

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.932

    Z-score2.3863

    Part of score+0.3977

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 53% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.838

    Z-score−0.0210

    Part of score−0.0035

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 93% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.877

    Z-score1.9336

    Part of score+0.3223

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 96% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.953

    Z-score2.2251

    Part of score+0.3708

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.91710.9623−0.4979−0.0830Better than 67% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.5380.5592.1613+0.3602Worse than 94% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI1.9320.4892.3863+0.3977Worse than 97% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.8380.795−0.0210−0.0035Worse than 53% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.8770.3461.9336+0.3223Worse than 93% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.9530.6412.2251+0.3708Worse than 96% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.4979PSI 90+2.1613CLABSI+2.3863CAUTI−0.0210SSI+1.9336CDI+2.2251MRSA)÷6measures=1.3646Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.9854 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 1.3646, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.4979 divided by 6 = −0.0830PSI 90−0.0830 CLABSI: z‑score 2.1613 divided by 6 = +0.3602CLABSI+0.3602 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 6 = +0.3977CAUTI+0.3977 SSI: z‑score −0.0210 divided by 6 = −0.0035SSI−0.0035 CDI: z‑score 1.9336 divided by 6 = +0.3223CDI+0.3223 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 6 = +0.3708MRSA+0.3708 Total HAC Score: 1.3646Score1.3646 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.51.01.5 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.4979 divided by 6 = −0.0830PSI 90−0.0830 CLABSI: z‑score 2.1613 divided by 6 = +0.3602CLABSI+0.3602 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 6 = +0.3977CAUTI+0.3977 SSI: z‑score −0.0210 divided by 6 = −0.0035SSI−0.0035 CDI: z‑score 1.9336 divided by 6 = +0.3223CDI+0.3223 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 6 = +0.3708MRSA+0.3708 Total HAC Score: 1.3646Score1.3646 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.51.01.5

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.4979−0.0830−0.0830
CLABSI2.1613+0.36020.2772
CAUTI2.3863+0.39770.6749
SSI−0.0210−0.00350.6714
CDI1.9336+0.32230.9937
MRSA2.2251+0.37081.3645
Total HAC Score1.3646
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.9854 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $82K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $82K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $82K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.3646 This hospital 1.3646 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $82K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $82Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.3646 This hospital 1.3646

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$81,563
This hospital1.3646−$81,563
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$81,563

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($8,182,065payment−$15,244readmissions−$10,522value-based)×1%the cut=$81,563HAC cut

$81,563HAC cut÷480traditional Medicare stays=$170per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $82K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$15K and −$11K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $6,097,459
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $880,046
Outliers: unusually costly stays $168,900
Capital: buildings and equipment $557,446
Uncompensated care $478,214
Total, before the three programs $8,182,065
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9975 − 1) −$15,244
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9983 − 1) −$10,522
After these two $8,156,299
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $62⁠–⁠103K −$81,563
Net of the three programs likely −$126K to −$86K −$107,329

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$6,097,459
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$880,046
Outliers: unusually costly stays$168,900
Capital: buildings and equipment$557,446
Uncompensated care$478,214
Total, before the three programs$8,182,065
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9975 − 1))−$15,244
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9983 − 1))−$10,522
After these two$8,156,299
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $62–103K)−$81,563
Net of the three programs (likely −$126K to −$86K)−$107,329

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score1.3646same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$82Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.3646 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $82K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9171 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.538 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 1.932 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.838 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.877 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.953 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 1.3646 among its measured results: +0.3977.
  • PSI 90 −0.0830
  • CLABSI +0.3602
  • CAUTI +0.3977
  • SSI −0.0035
  • CDI +0.3223
  • MRSA +0.3708

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.4979−0.0830same
CLABSI2.1613+0.3602same
CAUTI2.3863+0.3977same
SSI−0.0210−0.0035same
CDI1.9336+0.3223same
MRSA2.2251+0.3708same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050736/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 6 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 8 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.0500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.7500, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.0000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2018: score 1.0084, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.3922, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2020: score 1.2167, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2021: score 1.3554, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2022: score 1.1346, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.1341, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 1.2333, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2026: score 1.3646, higher than 97% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.0500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.7500, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.0000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2018: score 1.0084, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.3922, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2020: score 1.2167, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2021: score 1.3554, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2022: score 1.1346, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.1341, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 1.2333, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2026: score 1.3646, higher than 97% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20152.05006.1%not cut
FY20164.750033.4%not cut
FY20177.000083.1%cut
FY20181.008493.8%cut
FY20190.392277.2%cut
FY20201.216797.9%cut
FY20211.355498.7%cut
FY20221.134697.0%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.134162.1%not cut
FY20251.233396.6%cut
FY20261.364697.5%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 3 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 0.95 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 2.865CLABSI, 2022: 1.654CLABSI, 2023: 0.952 CAUTI 0.00 → 3.62 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 2.120CAUTI, 2019: 0.875CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 3.623 C. diff 1.31 → 0.30 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.307C. diff, 2018: 1.935C. diff, 2019: 2.741C. diff, 2021: 0.547C. diff, 2022: 0.774C. diff, 2023: 1.421C. diff, 2024: 0.301 CLABSI 0.00 → 0.95 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 2.865CLABSI, 2022: 1.654CLABSI, 2023: 0.952 CAUTI 0.00 → 3.62 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 2.120CAUTI, 2019: 0.875CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 3.623 C. diff 1.31 → 0.30 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.307C. diff, 2018: 1.935C. diff, 2019: 2.741C. diff, 2021: 0.547C. diff, 2022: 0.774C. diff, 2023: 1.421C. diff, 2024: 0.301

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIC. diff
20170.0000.0001.307
20182.1201.935
20190.8752.741
20212.8650.0000.547
20221.6540.0000.774
20230.9523.6231.421
20240.301

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 97% of the other 276 scored there.

In Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area, its score is higher than 97% of the other 69 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 30% (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area: CMS cut 21 of 70 (30%); middle score 0.0200Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area70 hospitals30% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 1.3646 This hospital 1.3646 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area: CMS cut 21 of 70 (30%); middle score 0.0200Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area70 hospitals30% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 1.3646 This hospital 1.3646

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045397%
West region59315726%−0.030296%
California2777627%−0.021797%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area702130%0.020097%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105396%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073298%
For-profit6519815%−0.259097%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057498%
This hospital1.3646
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is about a mile away.
8. Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles: score −0.2027, not cut, 4 miles87. San Gabriel Valley Medical Center, San Gabriel: score −0.3469, not cut, 4 miles76. Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles: score 0.0285, not cut, 4 miles65. Los Angeles Community Hospital, Los Angeles: score −0.0570, not cut, 4 miles54. Adventist Health White Memorial Montebello, Montebello: score 0.4948, cut, 3 miles43. East Los Angeles Doctors Hospital, Los Angeles: score −0.7472, not cut, 3 miles32. Alhambra Hospital Medical Center, Alhambra: score 0.0747, not cut, 3 miles21. Garfield Medical Center, Monterey Park: score 1.1736, cut, about a mile1This hospital: Monterey Park Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Garfield Medical Center, Monterey Park, CA11.1736cut
Alhambra Hospital Medical Center, Alhambra, CA30.0747not cut
East Los Angeles Doctors Hospital, Los Angeles, CA3−0.7472not cut
Adventist Health White Memorial Montebello, Montebello, CA30.4948cut
Los Angeles Community Hospital, Los Angeles, CA4−0.0570not cut
Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA40.0285not cut
San Gabriel Valley Medical Center, San Gabriel, CA4−0.3469not cut
Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA4−0.2027not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Garfield Medical CenterMonterey Park, CA11.17361% cut$337KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
2Alhambra Hospital Medical CenterAlhambra, CA30.0747No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3East Los Angeles Doctors HospitalLos Angeles, CA3−0.7472No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 4 measures
4Adventist Health White Memorial MontebelloMontebello, CA30.49481% cutno estimateAbove the national median on 2 of 4 measures
5Los Angeles Community HospitalLos Angeles, CA4−0.0570No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
6Keck Hospital of USCLos Angeles, CA40.0285No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7San Gabriel Valley Medical CenterSan Gabriel, CA4−0.3469No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
8Los Angeles General Medical CenterLos Angeles, CA4−0.2027No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Monterey Park Hospital, Monterey Park, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050736/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.