P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalPIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$339K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050471

1Hospital

PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital

2Location

Los Angeles, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 90017

Los Angeles County

3Type

Minor teaching · 380 beds · For-profit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.1125

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $552K, likely $450⁠–⁠600K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.1125 for PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $552K estimate 1% of about $55.2M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.4924 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $450–600K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.1125 This hospital −0.1125 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.1125 This hospital −0.1125

Higher than 45% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 7 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19No
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.2004, to −0.3129. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 84% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1345

    Z-score1.0194

    Part of score+0.1699

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 59% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value0.461

    Z-score−0.3371

    Part of score−0.0562

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 57% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value0.418

    Z-score−0.3110

    Part of score−0.0518

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 82% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value0.276

    Z-score−0.9837

    Part of score−0.1640

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 65% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.449

    Z-score0.2764

    Part of score+0.0461

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 59% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value0.535

    Z-score−0.3392

    Part of score−0.0565

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.13450.96231.0194+0.1699Worse than 84% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.4610.559−0.3371−0.0562Better than 59% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.4180.489−0.3110−0.0518Better than 57% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.2760.795−0.9837−0.1640Better than 82% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.4490.3460.2764+0.0461Worse than 65% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.5350.641−0.3392−0.0565Better than 59% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.0194PSI 90−0.3371CLABSI−0.3110CAUTI−0.9837SSI+0.2764CDI−0.3392MRSA)÷6measures=−0.1125Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.1125; CMS reports −0.1125. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.4924 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.1125, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.0194 divided by 6 = +0.1699PSI 90+0.1699 CLABSI: z‑score −0.3371 divided by 6 = −0.0562CLABSI−0.0562 CAUTI: z‑score −0.3110 divided by 6 = −0.0518CAUTI−0.0518 SSI: z‑score −0.9837 divided by 6 = −0.1640SSI−0.1640 CDI: z‑score 0.2764 divided by 6 = +0.0461CDI+0.0461 MRSA: z‑score −0.3392 divided by 6 = −0.0565MRSA−0.0565 Total HAC Score: −0.1125Score−0.1125 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.0194 divided by 6 = +0.1699PSI 90+0.1699 CLABSI: z‑score −0.3371 divided by 6 = −0.0562CLABSI−0.0562 CAUTI: z‑score −0.3110 divided by 6 = −0.0518CAUTI−0.0518 SSI: z‑score −0.9837 divided by 6 = −0.1640SSI−0.1640 CDI: z‑score 0.2764 divided by 6 = +0.0461CDI+0.0461 MRSA: z‑score −0.3392 divided by 6 = −0.0565MRSA−0.0565 Total HAC Score: −0.1125Score−0.1125 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.0194+0.16990.1699
CLABSI−0.3371−0.05620.1137
CAUTI−0.3110−0.05180.0619
SSI−0.9837−0.1640−0.1021
CDI0.2764+0.0461−0.0560
MRSA−0.3392−0.0565−0.1125
Total HAC Score−0.1125
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.4924 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.4924 higher, the cut would have been about $552K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $552K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $552K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.1125 This hospital −0.1125 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $552K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $552Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.1125 This hospital −0.1125

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$552,382
This hospital−0.1125$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$552,382

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($55,131,518payment+$446,024teaching, MA stays−$339,375readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$552,382at stake

$552,382at stake÷2,563traditional Medicare stays=$216per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $552K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$339K and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $43,509,619
Teaching (indirect medical education) $599,563
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $446,024
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $5,071,916
Outliers: unusually costly stays $412,906
Capital: buildings and equipment $3,940,897
Uncompensated care $1,596,617
Total, before the three programs $55,577,542
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9922 − 1) −$339,375
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $55,238,167
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $552,382 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$371K to −$293K −$339,375

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$43,509,619
Teaching (indirect medical education)$599,563
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$446,024
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$5,071,916
Outliers: unusually costly stays$412,906
Capital: buildings and equipment$3,940,897
Uncompensated care$1,596,617
Total, before the three programs$55,577,542
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9922 − 1))−$339,375
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$55,238,167
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $552,382)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$371K to −$293K)−$339,375

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.1125same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.1125 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $552K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIup to 1.998
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1345 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.461 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.418 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.276 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.449 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.535 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.1125 among its measured results: +0.1699.
  • PSI 90 +0.1699
  • CLABSI −0.0562
  • CAUTI −0.0518
  • SSI −0.1640
  • CDI +0.0461
  • MRSA −0.0565

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.0194+0.1699same
CLABSI−0.3371−0.0562same
CAUTI−0.3110−0.0518same
SSI−0.9837−0.1640same
CDI0.2764+0.0461same
MRSA−0.3392−0.0565same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050471/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 7 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.3500, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.7500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.5900, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.9177, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.339, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.8418, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.9991, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.7940, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.4342, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.2739, higher than 70% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.1125, higher than 45% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.3500, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.7500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.5900, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.9177, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.339, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.8418, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.9991, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.7940, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.4342, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.2739, higher than 70% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.1125, higher than 45% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.350082.1%cut
FY20166.750072.4%not cut
FY20177.590090.4%cut
FY20180.917792.5%cut
FY20190.33974.5%not cut
FY20200.841892.9%cut
FY20210.999196.1%cut
FY20220.794091.6%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.434277.6%cut
FY20250.273970.3%not cut
FY2026−0.112545.0%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.93 → 0.40 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.931CLABSI, 2018: 1.160CLABSI, 2019: 1.674CLABSI, 2021: 0.658CLABSI, 2022: 0.134CLABSI, 2023: 0.605CLABSI, 2024: 0.402 CAUTI 1.47 → 0.17 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.470CAUTI, 2018: 1.140CAUTI, 2019: 1.687CAUTI, 2021: 1.408CAUTI, 2022: 1.231CAUTI, 2023: 0.560CAUTI, 2024: 0.174 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2018: 3.805SSI, colon, 2019: 1.050SSI, colon, 2021: 0.393SSI, colon, 2022: 2.530SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 0.47 → 0.52 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.469MRSA, 2018: 1.111MRSA, 2019: 0.794MRSA, 2021: 2.128MRSA, 2022: 1.243MRSA, 2023: 0.354MRSA, 2024: 0.522 C. diff 1.04 → 0.56 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.039C. diff, 2018: 0.697C. diff, 2019: 0.436C. diff, 2021: 1.011C. diff, 2022: 0.542C. diff, 2023: 0.315C. diff, 2024: 0.564 CLABSI 0.93 → 0.40 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.931CLABSI, 2018: 1.160CLABSI, 2019: 1.674CLABSI, 2021: 0.658CLABSI, 2022: 0.134CLABSI, 2023: 0.605CLABSI, 2024: 0.402 CAUTI 1.47 → 0.17 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.470CAUTI, 2018: 1.140CAUTI, 2019: 1.687CAUTI, 2021: 1.408CAUTI, 2022: 1.231CAUTI, 2023: 0.560CAUTI, 2024: 0.174 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2018: 3.805SSI, colon, 2019: 1.050SSI, colon, 2021: 0.393SSI, colon, 2022: 2.530SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 0.47 → 0.52 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.469MRSA, 2018: 1.111MRSA, 2019: 0.794MRSA, 2021: 2.128MRSA, 2022: 1.243MRSA, 2023: 0.354MRSA, 2024: 0.522 C. diff 1.04 → 0.56 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.039C. diff, 2018: 0.697C. diff, 2019: 0.436C. diff, 2021: 1.011C. diff, 2022: 0.542C. diff, 2023: 0.315C. diff, 2024: 0.564

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.9311.4700.0000.4691.039
20181.1601.1403.8051.1110.697
20191.6741.6871.0500.7940.436
20210.6581.4080.3932.1281.011
20220.1341.2312.5301.2430.542
20230.6050.5600.0000.3540.315
20240.4020.1740.0000.5220.564

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 43% of the other 276 scored there.

In Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area, its score is higher than 40% of the other 69 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 1 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 30% (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area: CMS cut 21 of 70 (30%); middle score 0.0200Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area70 hospitals30% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.1125 This hospital −0.1125 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area: CMS cut 21 of 70 (30%); middle score 0.0200Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area70 hospitals30% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.1125 This hospital −0.1125

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045345%
West region59315726%−0.030243%
California2777627%−0.021743%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area702130%0.020040%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056744%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038444%
For-profit6519815%−0.259059%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057445%
This hospital−0.1125
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut none of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is about a mile away.
8. Southern California Hospital at Hollywood, Hollywood: score −1.2793, not cut, 5 miles87. Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles: score 0.0285, not cut, 4 miles76. Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Los Angeles, Los Angeles: score 0.0463, not cut, 4 miles65. Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles: score −1.0158, not cut, 3 miles54. Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles: score −0.2027, not cut, 3 miles43. Adventist Health White Memorial, Los Angeles: score −0.2254, not cut, 3 miles32. California Hospital Medical Center La, Los Angeles: score 0.2988, not cut, about a mile21. L A Downtown Medical Center, Los Angeles: score −0.0475, not cut, about a mile1This hospital: PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
L A Downtown Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA1−0.0475not cut
California Hospital Medical Center La, Los Angeles, CA10.2988not cut
Adventist Health White Memorial, Los Angeles, CA3−0.2254not cut
Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA3−0.2027not cut
Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA3−1.0158not cut
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA40.0463not cut
Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA40.0285not cut
Southern California Hospital at Hollywood, Hollywood, CA5−1.2793not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1L A Downtown Medical CenterLos Angeles, CA1−0.0475No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 4 measures
2California Hospital Medical Center LaLos Angeles, CA10.2988No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3Adventist Health White MemorialLos Angeles, CA3−0.2254No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
4Los Angeles General Medical CenterLos Angeles, CA3−0.2027No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5Hollywood Presbyterian Medical CenterLos Angeles, CA3−1.0158No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
6Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA40.0463No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
7Keck Hospital of USCLos Angeles, CA40.0285No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
8Southern California Hospital at HollywoodHollywood, CA5−1.2793No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 5 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

29
This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050471/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.