P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalStanford Health Care Estimated FY2026 net: +$1.6M×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050441

1Hospital

Stanford Health Care

2Location

Stanford, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 94305

Santa Clara County

3Type

Major teaching · 613 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

5 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.0796

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $6.3M, likely $5.2⁠–⁠6.9M estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0796 for Stanford Health Care and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $6.3M estimate 1% of about $635M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.3003 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $5.2–6.9M

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0796 This hospital 0.0796 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0796 This hospital 0.0796

Higher than 57% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 5 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CDI down to the national median (0.346) would lower the score the most: by 0.0897, to −0.0101. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; CDI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 82% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8647

    Z-score−0.8638

    Part of score−0.1440

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 62% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.698

    Z-score0.2127

    Part of score+0.0355

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 69% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.687

    Z-score0.3374

    Part of score+0.0562

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 63% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.994

    Z-score0.2463

    Part of score+0.0410

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 69% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.485

    Z-score0.4158

    Part of score+0.0693

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 60% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.759

    Z-score0.1290

    Part of score+0.0215

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.86470.9623−0.8638−0.1440Better than 82% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.6980.5590.2127+0.0355Worse than 62% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.6870.4890.3374+0.0562Worse than 69% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.9940.7950.2463+0.0410Worse than 63% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.4850.3460.4158+0.0693Worse than 69% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.7590.6410.1290+0.0215Worse than 60% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.8638PSI 90+0.2127CLABSI+0.3374CAUTI+0.2463SSI+0.4158CDI+0.1290MRSA)÷6measures=0.0796Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.3003 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.0796, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.8638 divided by 6 = −0.1440PSI 90−0.1440 CLABSI: z‑score 0.2127 divided by 6 = +0.0355CLABSI+0.0355 CAUTI: z‑score 0.3374 divided by 6 = +0.0562CAUTI+0.0562 SSI: z‑score 0.2463 divided by 6 = +0.0410SSI+0.0410 CDI: z‑score 0.4158 divided by 6 = +0.0693CDI+0.0693 MRSA: z‑score 0.1290 divided by 6 = +0.0215MRSA+0.0215 Total HAC Score: 0.0796Score0.0796 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.8638 divided by 6 = −0.1440PSI 90−0.1440 CLABSI: z‑score 0.2127 divided by 6 = +0.0355CLABSI+0.0355 CAUTI: z‑score 0.3374 divided by 6 = +0.0562CAUTI+0.0562 SSI: z‑score 0.2463 divided by 6 = +0.0410SSI+0.0410 CDI: z‑score 0.4158 divided by 6 = +0.0693CDI+0.0693 MRSA: z‑score 0.1290 divided by 6 = +0.0215MRSA+0.0215 Total HAC Score: 0.0796Score0.0796 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.8638−0.1440−0.1440
CLABSI0.2127+0.0355−0.1085
CAUTI0.3374+0.0562−0.0523
SSI0.2463+0.0410−0.0113
CDI0.4158+0.06930.0580
MRSA0.1290+0.02150.0795
Total HAC Score0.0796
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.3003 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.3003 higher, the cut would have been about $6.3M by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $6.3M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $6.3M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0796 This hospital 0.0796 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $6.3M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $6.3Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0796 This hospital 0.0796

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$6,345,461
This hospital0.0796$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$6,345,461

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($590,176,345payment+$42,796,176teaching, MA stays−$377,305readmissions+$1,950,931value-based)×1%the cut=$6,345,461at stake

$6,345,461at stake÷12,575traditional Medicare stays=$505per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $6.3M by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$377K and +$2.0M.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $314,420,938
Teaching (indirect medical education) $101,774,913
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $42,796,176
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $10,706,033
Outliers: unusually costly stays $120,548,988
Capital: buildings and equipment $37,503,686
Uncompensated care $5,221,787
Total, before the three programs $632,972,521
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9988 − 1) −$377,305
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0062 − 1) +$1,950,931
After these two $634,546,147
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $6,345,461 $0
Net of the three programs likely $1.4⁠–⁠1.7M +$1,573,626

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$314,420,938
Teaching (indirect medical education)$101,774,913
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$42,796,176
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$10,706,033
Outliers: unusually costly stays$120,548,988
Capital: buildings and equipment$37,503,686
Uncompensated care$5,221,787
Total, before the three programs$632,972,521
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9988 − 1))−$377,305
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0062 − 1))+$1,950,931
After these two$634,546,147
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $6,345,461)$0
Net of the three programs (likely $1.4–1.7M)+$1,573,626

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.0796same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0796 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $6.3M out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.1221
CLABSIup to 1.472
CAUTIup to 1.432
SSIup to 2.043
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAup to 1.619

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8647 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.698 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.687 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.994 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.485 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.759 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CDI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.0796 among its measured results: +0.0693.
  • PSI 90 −0.1440
  • CLABSI +0.0355
  • CAUTI +0.0562
  • SSI +0.0410
  • CDI +0.0693
  • MRSA +0.0215

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.8638−0.1440same
CLABSI0.2127+0.0355same
CAUTI0.3374+0.0562same
SSI0.2463+0.0410same
CDI0.4158+0.0693same
MRSA0.1290+0.0215same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050441/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 5 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 5 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.4000, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 7.5000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.8500, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.5726, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.9904, higher than 94% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.4628, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.0065, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.2633, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.0725, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0991, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0796, higher than 57% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.4000, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 7.5000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.8500, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.5726, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.9904, higher than 94% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.4628, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.0065, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.2633, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.0725, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0991, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0796, higher than 57% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.400065.3%not cut
FY20167.500083.9%cut
FY20177.850092.5%cut
FY20180.572684.5%cut
FY20190.990494.4%cut
FY20200.462881.5%cut
FY20210.006552.8%not cut
FY20220.263372.6%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.072547.1%not cut
FY20250.099159.5%not cut
FY20260.079657.9%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 6 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.48 → 0.61 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.478CLABSI, 2018: 0.665CLABSI, 2019: 0.615CLABSI, 2021: 1.280CLABSI, 2022: 0.853CLABSI, 2023: 0.787CLABSI, 2024: 0.610 CAUTI 1.04 → 0.59 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.038CAUTI, 2018: 1.009CAUTI, 2019: 1.285CAUTI, 2021: 0.494CAUTI, 2022: 0.782CAUTI, 2023: 0.777CAUTI, 2024: 0.593 SSI, colon 1.14 → 0.86 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.141SSI, colon, 2018: 0.664SSI, colon, 2019: 1.241SSI, colon, 2021: 1.227SSI, colon, 2022: 0.555SSI, colon, 2023: 1.129SSI, colon, 2024: 0.862 SSI, hysterectomy 3.24 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 3.244SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.473SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.356SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.517SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 2.118SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 1.52 → 0.75 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.525MRSA, 2018: 0.386MRSA, 2019: 0.513MRSA, 2021: 0.814MRSA, 2022: 0.885MRSA, 2023: 0.768MRSA, 2024: 0.749 C. diff 1.09 → 0.45 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.093C. diff, 2018: 0.811C. diff, 2019: 0.793C. diff, 2021: 0.920C. diff, 2022: 0.608C. diff, 2023: 0.521C. diff, 2024: 0.452 CLABSI 1.48 → 0.61 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.478CLABSI, 2018: 0.665CLABSI, 2019: 0.615CLABSI, 2021: 1.280CLABSI, 2022: 0.853CLABSI, 2023: 0.787CLABSI, 2024: 0.610 CAUTI 1.04 → 0.59 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.038CAUTI, 2018: 1.009CAUTI, 2019: 1.285CAUTI, 2021: 0.494CAUTI, 2022: 0.782CAUTI, 2023: 0.777CAUTI, 2024: 0.593 SSI, colon 1.14 → 0.86 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.141SSI, colon, 2018: 0.664SSI, colon, 2019: 1.241SSI, colon, 2021: 1.227SSI, colon, 2022: 0.555SSI, colon, 2023: 1.129SSI, colon, 2024: 0.862 SSI, hysterectomy 3.24 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 3.244SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.473SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.356SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.517SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 2.118SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 1.52 → 0.75 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.525MRSA, 2018: 0.386MRSA, 2019: 0.513MRSA, 2021: 0.814MRSA, 2022: 0.885MRSA, 2023: 0.768MRSA, 2024: 0.749 C. diff 1.09 → 0.45 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.093C. diff, 2018: 0.811C. diff, 2019: 0.793C. diff, 2021: 0.920C. diff, 2022: 0.608C. diff, 2023: 0.521C. diff, 2024: 0.452

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20171.4781.0381.1413.2441.5251.093
20180.6651.0090.6641.4730.3860.811
20190.6151.2851.2411.3560.5130.793
20211.2800.4941.2271.5170.8140.920
20220.8530.7820.5550.0000.8850.608
20230.7870.7771.1292.1180.7680.521
20240.6100.5930.8620.0000.7490.452

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 57% of the other 276 scored there.

In San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA area, its score is higher than 33% of the other 6 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 5 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 43% (San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA area: CMS cut 3 of 7 (43%); middle score 0.2933San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA area7 hospitals43% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up 365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.0796 This hospital 0.0796 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA area: CMS cut 3 of 7 (43%); middle score 0.2933San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA area7 hospitals43% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.0796 This hospital 0.0796

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045357%
West region59315726%−0.030257%
California2777627%−0.021757%
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA area7343%0.293333%
Major teaching42413632%0.178043%
500 beds and up36510529%0.132345%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013455%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057459%
This hospital0.0796
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 6 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose: score 0.7741, cut, 15 miles87. Washington Hospital, Fremont: score −0.3622, not cut, 14 miles76. Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Fremont, Fremont: score 0.3788, not cut, 14 miles65. Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Santa Clara, Santa Clara: score 0.5070, cut, 11 miles54. San Mateo Medical Center, San Mateo: score −0.1382, not cut, 10 miles43. Sequoia Hospital, Redwood City: score 0.0267, not cut, 6 miles32. El Camino Health, Mountain View: score −0.1713, not cut, 6 miles21. Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Redwood City, Redwood City: score −0.3395, not cut, 6 miles1This hospital: Stanford Health Care

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Redwood City, Redwood City, CA6−0.3395not cut
El Camino Health, Mountain View, CA6−0.1713not cut
Sequoia Hospital, Redwood City, CA60.0267not cut
San Mateo Medical Center, San Mateo, CA10−0.1382not cut
Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Santa Clara, Santa Clara, CA110.5070cut
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Fremont, Fremont, CA140.3788not cut
Washington Hospital, Fremont, CA14−0.3622not cut
Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA150.7741cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Redwood CityRedwood City, CA6−0.3395No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2El Camino HealthMountain View, CA6−0.1713No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Sequoia HospitalRedwood City, CA60.0267No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
4San Mateo Medical CenterSan Mateo, CA10−0.1382No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Santa ClaraSanta Clara, CA110.50701% cut$332KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
6Kaiser Foundation Hospital - FremontFremont, CA140.3788No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7Washington HospitalFremont, CA14−0.3622No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8Santa Clara Valley Medical CenterSan Jose, CA150.77411% cut$1.9MAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050441/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.