P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalBarstow Community Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$78K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050298

1Hospital

Barstow Community Hospital

2Location

Barstow, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 92311

San Bernardino County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 56 beds · For-profit · Urban · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

1 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

1.2103

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

Likely $41⁠–⁠65K; about $206 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$58K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.2103 for Barstow Community Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $5.8M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $206 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $41–65K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.2103 This hospital 1.2103 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.2103 This hospital 1.2103

Higher than 96% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 4 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.6046, to 0.6057. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 4 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 94% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.3087

    Z-score2.2356

    Part of score+0.5589

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 69% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.778

    Z-score0.3983

    Part of score+0.0996

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 55% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.553

    Z-score0.0144

    Part of score+0.0036

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 99% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value2.630

    Z-score2.1931

    Part of score+0.5483

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.30870.96232.2356+0.5589Worse than 94% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.7780.5590.3983+0.0996Worse than 69% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.5530.4890.0144+0.0036Worse than 55% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDI2.6300.3462.1931+0.5483Worse than 99% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 4; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(2.2356PSI 90+0.3983CLABSI+0.0144CAUTI+2.1931CDI)÷4measures=1.2103Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make 1.2104; CMS reports 1.2103. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.8311 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 1.2103, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.2356 divided by 4 = +0.5589PSI 90+0.5589 CLABSI: z‑score 0.3983 divided by 4 = +0.0996CLABSI+0.0996 CAUTI: z‑score 0.0144 divided by 4 = +0.0036CAUTI+0.0036 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 4 = +0.5483CDI+0.5483 Total HAC Score: 1.2103Score1.2103 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.01.2 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.2356 divided by 4 = +0.5589PSI 90+0.5589 CLABSI: z‑score 0.3983 divided by 4 = +0.0996CLABSI+0.0996 CAUTI: z‑score 0.0144 divided by 4 = +0.0036CAUTI+0.0036 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 4 = +0.5483CDI+0.5483 Total HAC Score: 1.2103Score1.2103 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.01.2

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 902.2356+0.55890.5589
CLABSI0.3983+0.09960.6585
CAUTI0.0144+0.00360.6621
CDI2.1931+0.54831.2104
Total HAC Score1.2103
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.8311 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $58K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $58K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $58K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.2103 This hospital 1.2103 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $58K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $58Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.2103 This hospital 1.2103

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$57,546
This hospital1.2103−$57,546
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$57,546

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($5,774,791payment+$0readmissions−$20,208value-based)×1%the cut=$57,546HAC cut

$57,546HAC cut÷279traditional Medicare stays=$206per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $58K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and −$20K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $3,906,043
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $117,181
Outliers: unusually costly stays $35,389
Sole community hospital rate difference $631,651
Low-volume adjustment $780,869
Capital: buildings and equipment $303,658
Total, before the three programs $5,774,791
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9948 − 1) −$20,208
After these two $5,754,583
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $41⁠–⁠65K −$57,546
Net of the three programs likely −$82K to −$54K −$77,754

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$3,906,043
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$117,181
Outliers: unusually costly stays$35,389
Sole community hospital rate difference$631,651
Low-volume adjustment$780,869
Capital: buildings and equipment$303,658
Total, before the three programs$5,774,791
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9948 − 1))−$20,208
After these two$5,754,583
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $41–65K)−$57,546
Net of the three programs (likely −$82K to −$54K)−$77,754

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score1.2103same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$58Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.2103 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $58K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.8324 or lower
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
CDI0.085 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 4 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.3087 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1745

CMS 0.778 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0580

CMS 0.553 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0603

CMS 2.630 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0968

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 1.2103 among its measured results: +0.5589.
  • PSI 90 +0.5589
  • CLABSI +0.0996
  • CAUTI +0.0036
  • CDI +0.5483

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 4, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 902.2356+0.5589same
CLABSI0.3983+0.0996same
CAUTI0.0144+0.0036same
CDI2.1931+0.5483same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.3500, higher than 1% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 1.9375, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −1.0040, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2726, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.1047, higher than 61% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.3031, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 1.0975, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.1852, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.1540, higher than 63% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 1.2103, higher than 96% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.3500, higher than 1% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 1.9375, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −1.0040, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2726, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.1047, higher than 61% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.3031, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 1.0975, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.1852, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.1540, higher than 63% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 1.2103, higher than 96% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20151.35001.6%not cut
FY20162.25006.2%not cut
FY20171.93757.3%not cut
FY2018−1.00407.8%not cut
FY2019−0.272632.2%not cut
FY20200.104761.3%not cut
FY20210.303173.2%not cut
FY20221.097596.5%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.185265.2%not cut
FY20250.154063.0%not cut
FY20261.210396.6%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 3 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.84 → 0.94 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 1.845CLABSI, 2022: 0.937 CAUTI 1.67 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2021: 1.669CAUTI, 2022: 0.909CAUTI, 2023: 0.000 C. diff 3.33 → 2.18 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 3.330C. diff, 2018: 1.890C. diff, 2019: 0.632C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.587C. diff, 2023: 3.176C. diff, 2024: 2.181 CLABSI 1.84 → 0.94 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 1.845CLABSI, 2022: 0.937 CAUTI 1.67 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2021: 1.669CAUTI, 2022: 0.909CAUTI, 2023: 0.000 C. diff 3.33 → 2.18 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 3.330C. diff, 2018: 1.890C. diff, 2019: 0.632C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.587C. diff, 2023: 3.176C. diff, 2024: 2.181

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIC. diff
20173.330
20181.890
20190.632
20211.8451.6690.000
20220.9370.9090.587
20230.0003.176
20242.181

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 96% of the other 276 scored there.

In Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area, its score is higher than 100% of the other 29 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 13% (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area) to 28% (Fewer than 100 beds).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area: CMS cut 4 of 30 (13%); middle score −0.3020Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area30 hospitals13% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 1.2103 This hospital 1.2103 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area: CMS cut 4 of 30 (13%); middle score −0.3020Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area30 hospitals13% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 1.2103 This hospital 1.2103

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045396%
West region59315726%−0.030295%
California2777627%−0.021796%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area30413%−0.3020100%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105395%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115492%
For-profit6519815%−0.259096%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057497%
This hospital1.2103
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 23 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda: score −0.5774, not cut, 60 miles87. Redlands Community Hospital, Redlands: score 0.4496, cut, 60 miles76. Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton: score −0.0272, not cut, 60 miles65. Community Hospital of San Bernardino, San Bernardino: score −0.5166, not cut, 55 miles54. St Bernardine Medical Center, San Bernardino: score −0.4108, not cut, 55 miles43. Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville: score −0.9449, not cut, 33 miles32. Victor Valley Global Medical Center, Victorville: score 0.0953, not cut, 30 miles21. Providence St Mary Medical Center, Apple Valley: score 0.4569, cut, 23 miles1This hospital: Barstow Community Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Providence St Mary Medical Center, Apple Valley, CA230.4569cut
Victor Valley Global Medical Center, Victorville, CA300.0953not cut
Desert Valley Hospital, Victorville, CA33−0.9449not cut
St Bernardine Medical Center, San Bernardino, CA55−0.4108not cut
Community Hospital of San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA55−0.5166not cut
Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA60−0.0272not cut
Redlands Community Hospital, Redlands, CA600.4496cut
Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA60−0.5774not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Providence St Mary Medical CenterApple Valley, CA230.45691% cut$383KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
2Victor Valley Global Medical CenterVictorville, CA300.0953No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3Desert Valley HospitalVictorville, CA33−0.9449No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
4St Bernardine Medical CenterSan Bernardino, CA55−0.4108No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5Community Hospital of San BernardinoSan Bernardino, CA55−0.5166No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
6Arrowhead Regional Medical CenterColton, CA60−0.0272No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Redlands Community HospitalRedlands, CA600.44961% cut$256KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
8Loma Linda University Medical CenterLoma Linda, CA60−0.5774No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Barstow Community Hospital, Barstow, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050298/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.