P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalCalifornia Pacific Medical Center- Van Ness Campus Estimated FY2026 net: +$263K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050047

1Hospital

California Pacific Medical Center- Van Ness Campus

2Location

San Francisco, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 94109

San Francisco County

3Type

Major teaching · 480 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.0340

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $1.4M, likely $1.1⁠–⁠1.8M estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0340 for California Pacific Medical Center- Van Ness Campus and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $1.4M estimate 1% of about $143M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.3459 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $1.1–1.8M

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0340 This hospital 0.0340 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0340 This hospital 0.0340

Higher than 54% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 3 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.1570, to −0.1230. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 75% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0583

    Z-score0.4877

    Part of score+0.0813

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 58% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.658

    Z-score0.1199

    Part of score+0.0200

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 68% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.314

    Z-score−0.5617

    Part of score−0.0936

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 80% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.345

    Z-score0.8475

    Part of score+0.1413

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 73% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.190

    Z-score−0.7265

    Part of score−0.1211

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 56% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.715

    Z-score0.0370

    Part of score+0.0062

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.05830.96230.4877+0.0813Worse than 75% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.6580.5590.1199+0.0200Worse than 58% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.3140.489−0.5617−0.0936Better than 68% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.3450.7950.8475+0.1413Worse than 80% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.1900.346−0.7265−0.1211Better than 73% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.7150.6410.0370+0.0062Worse than 56% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.4877PSI 90+0.1199CLABSI−0.5617CAUTI+0.8475SSI−0.7265CDI+0.0370MRSA)÷6measures=0.0340Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.3459 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.0340, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.4877 divided by 6 = +0.0813PSI 90+0.0813 CLABSI: z‑score 0.1199 divided by 6 = +0.0200CLABSI+0.0200 CAUTI: z‑score −0.5617 divided by 6 = −0.0936CAUTI−0.0936 SSI: z‑score 0.8475 divided by 6 = +0.1413SSI+0.1413 CDI: z‑score −0.7265 divided by 6 = −0.1211CDI−0.1211 MRSA: z‑score 0.0370 divided by 6 = +0.0062MRSA+0.0062 Total HAC Score: 0.0340Score0.0340 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.4877 divided by 6 = +0.0813PSI 90+0.0813 CLABSI: z‑score 0.1199 divided by 6 = +0.0200CLABSI+0.0200 CAUTI: z‑score −0.5617 divided by 6 = −0.0936CAUTI−0.0936 SSI: z‑score 0.8475 divided by 6 = +0.1413SSI+0.1413 CDI: z‑score −0.7265 divided by 6 = −0.1211CDI−0.1211 MRSA: z‑score 0.0370 divided by 6 = +0.0062MRSA+0.0062 Total HAC Score: 0.0340Score0.0340 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.4877+0.08130.0813
CLABSI0.1199+0.02000.1013
CAUTI−0.5617−0.09360.0077
SSI0.8475+0.14130.1490
CDI−0.7265−0.12110.0279
MRSA0.0370+0.00620.0341
Total HAC Score0.0340
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.3459 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.3459 higher, the cut would have been about $1.4M by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.4M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.4M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0340 This hospital 0.0340 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.4M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.4Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0340 This hospital 0.0340

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$1,432,661
This hospital0.0340$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$1,432,661

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($136,642,496payment+$6,360,771teaching, MA stays−$313,501readmissions+$576,367value-based)×1%the cut=$1,432,661at stake

$1,432,661at stake÷3,627traditional Medicare stays=$395per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $1.4M by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$314K and +$576K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $89,571,661
Teaching (indirect medical education) $14,584,954
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $6,360,771
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $4,475,896
Outliers: unusually costly stays $14,744,391
Capital: buildings and equipment $10,789,680
Uncompensated care $2,475,914
Total, before the three programs $143,003,267
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9965 − 1) −$313,501
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0064 − 1) +$576,367
After these two $143,266,133
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $1,432,661 $0
Net of the three programs likely $212⁠–⁠309K +$262,866

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$89,571,661
Teaching (indirect medical education)$14,584,954
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$6,360,771
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$4,475,896
Outliers: unusually costly stays$14,744,391
Capital: buildings and equipment$10,789,680
Uncompensated care$2,475,914
Total, before the three programs$143,003,267
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9965 − 1))−$313,501
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0064 − 1))+$576,367
After these two$143,266,133
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $1,432,661)$0
Net of the three programs (likely $212–309K)+$262,866

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.0340same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0340 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $1.4M out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIup to 1.550
CAUTIup to 1.173
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIup to 0.724
MRSAup to 1.706

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0583 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.658 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.314 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.345 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.190 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.715 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.0340 among its measured results: +0.1413.
  • PSI 90 +0.0813
  • CLABSI +0.0200
  • CAUTI −0.0936
  • SSI +0.1413
  • CDI −0.1211
  • MRSA +0.0062

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.4877+0.0813same
CLABSI0.1199+0.0200same
CAUTI−0.5617−0.0936same
SSI0.8475+0.1413same
CDI−0.7265−0.1211same
MRSA0.0370+0.0062same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050047/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 3 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.0000, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 7.5000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.3600, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.0369, higher than 55% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2857, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.3730, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.3065, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1075, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.7009, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.1291, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0340, higher than 54% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.0000, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 7.5000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.3600, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.0369, higher than 55% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2857, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.3730, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.3065, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1075, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.7009, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.1291, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0340, higher than 54% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.000025.0%not cut
FY20167.500083.9%cut
FY20177.360088.1%cut
FY20180.036955.9%not cut
FY20190.285771.6%not cut
FY20200.373077.4%cut
FY20210.306573.4%not cut
FY2022−0.107543.9%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.700911.9%not cut
FY2025−0.129143.0%not cut
FY20260.034054.9%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 5 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.57 → 0.59 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.567CLABSI, 2018: 0.753CLABSI, 2019: 0.162CLABSI, 2021: 0.660CLABSI, 2022: 0.450CLABSI, 2023: 0.733CLABSI, 2024: 0.589 CAUTI 1.35 → 0.45 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.351CAUTI, 2018: 1.722CAUTI, 2019: 0.671CAUTI, 2021: 0.332CAUTI, 2022: 0.487CAUTI, 2023: 0.141CAUTI, 2024: 0.453 SSI, colon 1.05 → 0.57 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.054SSI, colon, 2018: 1.152SSI, colon, 2019: 0.433SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 2.577SSI, colon, 2024: 0.574 SSI, hysterectomy 1.86 → 0.97 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.863SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.788SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.674SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.968 MRSA 0.59 → 0.49 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.588MRSA, 2018: 0.387MRSA, 2019: 0.328MRSA, 2021: 0.286MRSA, 2022: 0.807MRSA, 2023: 0.892MRSA, 2024: 0.488 C. diff 0.97 → 0.17 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.972C. diff, 2018: 0.844C. diff, 2019: 0.804C. diff, 2021: 0.994C. diff, 2022: 0.243C. diff, 2023: 0.208C. diff, 2024: 0.172 CLABSI 0.57 → 0.59 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.567CLABSI, 2018: 0.753CLABSI, 2019: 0.162CLABSI, 2021: 0.660CLABSI, 2022: 0.450CLABSI, 2023: 0.733CLABSI, 2024: 0.589 CAUTI 1.35 → 0.45 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.351CAUTI, 2018: 1.722CAUTI, 2019: 0.671CAUTI, 2021: 0.332CAUTI, 2022: 0.487CAUTI, 2023: 0.141CAUTI, 2024: 0.453 SSI, colon 1.05 → 0.57 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.054SSI, colon, 2018: 1.152SSI, colon, 2019: 0.433SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 2.577SSI, colon, 2024: 0.574 SSI, hysterectomy 1.86 → 0.97 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.863SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.788SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.674SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.968 MRSA 0.59 → 0.49 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.588MRSA, 2018: 0.387MRSA, 2019: 0.328MRSA, 2021: 0.286MRSA, 2022: 0.807MRSA, 2023: 0.892MRSA, 2024: 0.488 C. diff 0.97 → 0.17 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.972C. diff, 2018: 0.844C. diff, 2019: 0.804C. diff, 2021: 0.994C. diff, 2022: 0.243C. diff, 2023: 0.208C. diff, 2024: 0.172

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20170.5671.3511.0541.8630.5880.972
20180.7531.7221.1520.7880.3870.844
20190.1620.6710.4331.6740.3280.804
20210.6600.3320.0000.2860.994
20220.4500.4870.0000.8070.243
20230.7330.1412.5770.8920.208
20240.5890.4530.5740.9680.4880.172

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 53% of the other 276 scored there.

In San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA area, its score is higher than 66% of the other 15 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 7 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 22% (300 to 499 beds) to 32% (Major teaching).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA area: CMS cut 4 of 16 (25%); middle score −0.0847San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA area16 hospitals25% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.0340 This hospital 0.0340 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA area: CMS cut 4 of 16 (25%); middle score −0.0847San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA area16 hospitals25% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.0340 This hospital 0.0340

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045354%
West region59315726%−0.030253%
California2777627%−0.021753%
San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA area16425%−0.084766%
Major teaching42413632%0.178041%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038456%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013453%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057456%
This hospital0.0340
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 4 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is less than a mile away.
8. UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco: score 0.2558, not cut, 3 miles87. California Pacific Medical Center - Mission Bernal, San Francisco: score −0.3667, not cut, 3 miles76. Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hosp & Trauma Ctr, San Francisco: score 0.4979, cut, 2 miles65. UCSF Health St. Mary's Hospital, San Francisco: score −0.2017, not cut, 2 miles54. California Pacific Medical Ctr-Davies Campus Hosp, San Francisco: score 0.4281, cut, about a mile43. Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco, San Francisco: score 0.4438, cut, about a mile32. Chinese Hospital, San Francisco: score 1.0334, cut, less than a mile21. UCSF Health Saint Francis Hospital, San Francisco: score −0.0598, not cut, less than a mile1This hospital: California Pacific Medical Center- Van Ness Campus

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
UCSF Health Saint Francis Hospital, San Francisco, CAunder 1−0.0598not cut
Chinese Hospital, San Francisco, CAunder 11.0334cut
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA10.4438cut
California Pacific Medical Ctr-Davies Campus Hosp, San Francisco, CA10.4281cut
UCSF Health St. Mary's Hospital, San Francisco, CA2−0.2017not cut
Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hosp & Trauma Ctr, San Francisco, CA20.4979cut
California Pacific Medical Center - Mission Bernal, San Francisco, CA3−0.3667not cut
UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA30.2558not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1UCSF Health Saint Francis HospitalSan Francisco, CAunder 1−0.0598No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2Chinese HospitalSan Francisco, CAunder 11.03341% cut$66KAbove the national median on 3 of 3 measures
3Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San FranciscoSan Francisco, CA10.44381% cut$279KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4California Pacific Medical Ctr-Davies Campus HospSan Francisco, CA10.42811% cut$207KAbove the national median on 4 of 5 measures
5UCSF Health St. Mary's HospitalSan Francisco, CA2−0.2017No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
6Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hosp & Trauma CtrSan Francisco, CA20.49791% cut$1.1MAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7California Pacific Medical Center - Mission BernalSan Francisco, CA3−0.3667No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8UCSF Medical CenterSan Francisco, CA30.2558No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. California Pacific Medical Center- Van Ness Campus, San Francisco, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050047/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.