P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalHonorHealth Scottsdale Thompson Peak Med Ctr Estimated FY2026 net: −$19K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 030123

1Hospital

HonorHealth Scottsdale Thompson Peak Med Ctr

2Location

Scottsdale, AZ (Arizona’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 85255

Maricopa County

3Type

Major teaching · 120 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

5 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.2242

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $470K, likely $358⁠–⁠591K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2242 for HonorHealth Scottsdale Thompson Peak Med Ctr and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $470K estimate 1% of about $47.0M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.1557 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $358–591K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2242 This hospital 0.2242 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2242 This hospital 0.2242

Higher than 66% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.2889, to −0.0647. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 80% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8742

    Z-score−0.7976

    Part of score−0.1329

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 67% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.384

    Z-score−0.5157

    Part of score−0.0860

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 77% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.808

    Z-score0.6291

    Part of score+0.1049

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 91% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.807

    Z-score1.6389

    Part of score+0.2732

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 73% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.517

    Z-score0.5397

    Part of score+0.0899

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 51% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.626

    Z-score−0.1490

    Part of score−0.0248

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.87420.9623−0.7976−0.1329Better than 80% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.3840.559−0.5157−0.0860Better than 67% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.8080.4890.6291+0.1049Worse than 77% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.8070.7951.6389+0.2732Worse than 91% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.5170.3460.5397+0.0899Worse than 73% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.6260.641−0.1490−0.0248Better than 51% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.7976PSI 90−0.5157CLABSI+0.6291CAUTI+1.6389SSI+0.5397CDI−0.1490MRSA)÷6measures=0.2242Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.1557 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.2242, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.7976 divided by 6 = −0.1329PSI 90−0.1329 CLABSI: z‑score −0.5157 divided by 6 = −0.0860CLABSI−0.0860 CAUTI: z‑score 0.6291 divided by 6 = +0.1049CAUTI+0.1049 SSI: z‑score 1.6389 divided by 6 = +0.2732SSI+0.2732 CDI: z‑score 0.5397 divided by 6 = +0.0899CDI+0.0899 MRSA: z‑score −0.1490 divided by 6 = −0.0248MRSA−0.0248 Total HAC Score: 0.2242Score0.2242 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.7976 divided by 6 = −0.1329PSI 90−0.1329 CLABSI: z‑score −0.5157 divided by 6 = −0.0860CLABSI−0.0860 CAUTI: z‑score 0.6291 divided by 6 = +0.1049CAUTI+0.1049 SSI: z‑score 1.6389 divided by 6 = +0.2732SSI+0.2732 CDI: z‑score 0.5397 divided by 6 = +0.0899CDI+0.0899 MRSA: z‑score −0.1490 divided by 6 = −0.0248MRSA−0.0248 Total HAC Score: 0.2242Score0.2242 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.7976−0.1329−0.1329
CLABSI−0.5157−0.0860−0.2189
CAUTI0.6291+0.1049−0.1140
SSI1.6389+0.27320.1592
CDI0.5397+0.08990.2491
MRSA−0.1490−0.02480.2243
Total HAC Score0.2242
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1557 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.1557 higher, the cut would have been about $470K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $470K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $470K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2242 This hospital 0.2242 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $470K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $470Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2242 This hospital 0.2242

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$469,914
This hospital0.2242$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$469,914

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($44,458,021payment+$2,552,479teaching, MA stays−$257,267readmissions+$238,135value-based)×1%the cut=$469,914at stake

$469,914at stake÷3,236traditional Medicare stays=$145per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $470K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$257K and +$238K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $35,731,501
Teaching (indirect medical education) $5,093,883
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $2,552,479
Outliers: unusually costly stays $388,401
Capital: buildings and equipment $3,244,236
Total, before the three programs $47,010,500
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9928 − 1) −$257,267
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0067 − 1) +$238,135
After these two $46,991,368
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $469,914 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$22K to −$15K −$19,132

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, low-income-patient payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$35,731,501
Teaching (indirect medical education)$5,093,883
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$2,552,479
Outliers: unusually costly stays$388,401
Capital: buildings and equipment$3,244,236
Total, before the three programs$47,010,500
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9928 − 1))−$257,267
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0067 − 1))+$238,135
After these two$46,991,368
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $469,914)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$22K to −$15K)−$19,132

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.2242same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2242 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $470K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.0073
CLABSIup to 0.784
CAUTIup to 1.193
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIup to 0.757
MRSAup to 1.070

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8742 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.384 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.808 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.807 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.517 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.626 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.2242 among its measured results: +0.2732.
  • PSI 90 −0.1329
  • CLABSI −0.0860
  • CAUTI +0.1049
  • SSI +0.2732
  • CDI +0.0899
  • MRSA −0.0248

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.7976−0.1329same
CLABSI−0.5157−0.0860same
CAUTI0.6291+0.1049same
SSI1.6389+0.2732same
CDI0.5397+0.0899same
MRSA−0.1490−0.0248same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030123/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.2500, higher than 63% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.5000, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.5100, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0760, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.0843, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3140, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2411, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2061, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.1970, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0952, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2242, higher than 66% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.2500, higher than 63% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.5000, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.5100, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0760, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.0843, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3140, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2411, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2061, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.1970, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0952, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2242, higher than 66% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.250063.1%not cut
FY20166.500068.6%not cut
FY20176.510074.7%not cut
FY2018−0.076045.0%not cut
FY2019−0.084345.5%not cut
FY2020−0.314029.4%not cut
FY2021−0.241134.5%not cut
FY2022−0.206136.9%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.197038.4%not cut
FY20250.095259.2%not cut
FY20260.224266.4%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.41 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.415CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.316CLABSI, 2021: 0.646CLABSI, 2022: 1.708CLABSI, 2023: 0.716CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 1.31 → 1.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.309CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.265CAUTI, 2021: 1.141CAUTI, 2022: 0.624CAUTI, 2023: 0.625CAUTI, 2024: 1.003 SSI, colon 1.62 → 1.33 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.616SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.540SSI, colon, 2021: 0.777SSI, colon, 2022: 0.911SSI, colon, 2023: 2.847SSI, colon, 2024: 1.327 SSI, hysterectomy 0.49 → 1.10 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.492SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.554SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.105 MRSA 0.00 → 0.61 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.000MRSA, 2018: 1.383MRSA, 2019: 0.621MRSA, 2021: 2.978MRSA, 2022: 0.000MRSA, 2023: 0.645MRSA, 2024: 0.608 C. diff 0.72 → 0.27 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.723C. diff, 2018: 1.351C. diff, 2019: 0.477C. diff, 2021: 0.502C. diff, 2022: 0.698C. diff, 2023: 0.748C. diff, 2024: 0.269 CLABSI 0.41 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.415CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.316CLABSI, 2021: 0.646CLABSI, 2022: 1.708CLABSI, 2023: 0.716CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 1.31 → 1.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.309CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.265CAUTI, 2021: 1.141CAUTI, 2022: 0.624CAUTI, 2023: 0.625CAUTI, 2024: 1.003 SSI, colon 1.62 → 1.33 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.616SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.540SSI, colon, 2021: 0.777SSI, colon, 2022: 0.911SSI, colon, 2023: 2.847SSI, colon, 2024: 1.327 SSI, hysterectomy 0.49 → 1.10 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.492SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.554SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.105 MRSA 0.00 → 0.61 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.000MRSA, 2018: 1.383MRSA, 2019: 0.621MRSA, 2021: 2.978MRSA, 2022: 0.000MRSA, 2023: 0.645MRSA, 2024: 0.608 C. diff 0.72 → 0.27 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.723C. diff, 2018: 1.351C. diff, 2019: 0.477C. diff, 2021: 0.502C. diff, 2022: 0.698C. diff, 2023: 0.748C. diff, 2024: 0.269

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20170.4151.3091.6160.4920.0000.723
20180.0000.0000.0000.5541.3831.351
20190.3160.2650.5401.1050.6210.477
20210.6461.1410.7772.9780.502
20221.7080.6240.9110.0000.698
20230.7160.6252.8470.6450.748
20240.0001.0031.3270.6080.269

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Arizona, its score is higher than 66% of the other 60 scored there.

In Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area, its score is higher than 66% of the other 36 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 19% (Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area) to 32% (Major teaching).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona 61 hospitals20% cut Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area: CMS cut 7 of 37 (19%); middle score 0.0991Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area37 hospitals19% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.2242 This hospital 0.2242 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona61 hospitals20% cut Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area: CMS cut 7 of 37 (19%); middle score 0.0991Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area37 hospitals19% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.2242 This hospital 0.2242

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045366%
West region59315726%−0.030265%
Arizona611220%0.056066%
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area37719%0.099166%
Major teaching42413632%0.178054%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073267%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013465%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057468%
This hospital0.2242
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut none of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. The Core Institute Specialty Hosp, Phoenix: score −1.0835, not cut, 14 miles87. Phoenix Indian Medical Center, Phoenix: score 0.3662, not cut, 14 miles76. HonorHealth Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center, Scottsdale: score 0.0746, not cut, 13 miles65. HonorHealth Deer Valley Medical Center, Phoenix: score 0.2475, not cut, 11 miles54. Honor Health John C. Lincoln Medical Center, Phoenix: score 0.3289, not cut, 11 miles43. HonorHealth Scottsdale Shea Medical Center, Scottsdale: score 0.3178, not cut, 6 miles32. Abrazo Scottsdale Campus, Phoenix: score −0.5216, not cut, 5 miles21. Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix: score −0.0274, not cut, 2 miles1This hospital: HonorHealth Scottsdale Thompson Peak Med Ctr

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ2−0.0274not cut
Abrazo Scottsdale Campus, Phoenix, AZ5−0.5216not cut
HonorHealth Scottsdale Shea Medical Center, Scottsdale, AZ60.3178not cut
Honor Health John C. Lincoln Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ110.3289not cut
HonorHealth Deer Valley Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ110.2475not cut
HonorHealth Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center, Scottsdale, AZ130.0746not cut
Phoenix Indian Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ140.3662not cut
The Core Institute Specialty Hosp, Phoenix, AZ14−1.0835not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Mayo Clinic HospitalPhoenix, AZ2−0.0274No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2Abrazo Scottsdale CampusPhoenix, AZ5−0.5216No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
3HonorHealth Scottsdale Shea Medical CenterScottsdale, AZ60.3178No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
4Honor Health John C. Lincoln Medical CenterPhoenix, AZ110.3289No cut$0Above the national median on 6 of 6 measures
5HonorHealth Deer Valley Medical CenterPhoenix, AZ110.2475No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
6HonorHealth Scottsdale Osborn Medical CenterScottsdale, AZ130.0746No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
7Phoenix Indian Medical CenterPhoenix, AZ140.3662No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 4 measures
8The Core Institute Specialty HospPhoenix, AZ14−1.0835No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. HonorHealth Scottsdale Thompson Peak Med Ctr, Scottsdale, AZ: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030123/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.