P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalFairbanks Memorial Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$300K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 020012

1Hospital

Fairbanks Memorial Hospital

2Location

Fairbanks, AK (Alaska’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 99701

Fairbanks North Star

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 162 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.4022

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$380K estimate
Likely $295⁠–⁠463K; about $272 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$380K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4022 for Fairbanks Memorial Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $38.0M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $272 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $295–463K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4022 This hospital 0.4022 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4022 This hospital 0.4022

Higher than 75% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 5 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.3917, to 0.0105. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 50% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9640

    Z-score−0.1711

    Part of score−0.0285

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 98% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value2.082

    Z-score2.2402

    Part of score+0.3734

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 74% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.245

    Z-score−0.7280

    Part of score−0.1213

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 96% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value2.338

    Z-score2.1717

    Part of score+0.3620

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 67% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.470

    Z-score0.3577

    Part of score+0.0596

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 87% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4573

    Part of score−0.2429

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.96400.9623−0.1711−0.0285Worse than 50% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI2.0820.5592.2402+0.3734Worse than 98% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.2450.489−0.7280−0.1213Better than 74% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI2.3380.7952.1717+0.3620Worse than 96% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.4700.3460.3577+0.0596Worse than 67% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.0000.641−1.4573−0.2429Better than 87% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.1711PSI 90+2.2402CLABSI−0.7280CAUTI+2.1717SSI+0.3577CDI−1.4573MRSA)÷6measures=0.4022Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0230 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.4022, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1711 divided by 6 = −0.0285PSI 90−0.0285 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score −0.7280 divided by 6 = −0.1213CAUTI−0.1213 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score 0.3577 divided by 6 = +0.0596CDI+0.0596 MRSA: z‑score −1.4573 divided by 6 = −0.2429MRSA−0.2429 Total HAC Score: 0.4022Score0.4022 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1711 divided by 6 = −0.0285PSI 90−0.0285 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score −0.7280 divided by 6 = −0.1213CAUTI−0.1213 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score 0.3577 divided by 6 = +0.0596CDI+0.0596 MRSA: z‑score −1.4573 divided by 6 = −0.2429MRSA−0.2429 Total HAC Score: 0.4022Score0.4022 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.1711−0.0285−0.0285
CLABSI2.2402+0.37340.3449
CAUTI−0.7280−0.12130.2236
SSI2.1717+0.36200.5856
CDI0.3577+0.05960.6452
MRSA−1.4573−0.24290.4023
Total HAC Score0.4022
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0230 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $380K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $380K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $380K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4022 This hospital 0.4022 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $380K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $380Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4022 This hospital 0.4022

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$380,121
This hospital0.4022−$380,121
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$380,121

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($37,932,147payment−$14,073readmissions+$93,985value-based)×1%the cut=$380,121HAC cut

$380,121HAC cut÷1,398traditional Medicare stays=$272per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $380K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$14K and +$94K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $17,590,911
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,019,745
Outliers: unusually costly stays $2,666,254
Sole community hospital rate difference $14,935,184
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,720,053
Total, before the three programs $37,932,147
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9992 − 1) −$14,073
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0053 − 1) +$93,985
After these two $38,012,059
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $295⁠–⁠463K −$380,121
Net of the three programs likely −$348K to −$240K −$300,209

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$17,590,911
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,019,745
Outliers: unusually costly stays$2,666,254
Sole community hospital rate difference$14,935,184
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,720,053
Total, before the three programs$37,932,147
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9992 − 1))−$14,073
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0053 − 1))+$93,985
After these two$38,012,059
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $295–463K)−$380,121
Net of the three programs (likely −$348K to −$240K)−$300,209

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.4022same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$380Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4022 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $380K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.9441 or lower
CLABSI1.512 or lower
CAUTI0.187 or lower
SSI2.037 or lower
CDI0.434 or lower
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9640 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 2.082 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.245 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 2.338 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.470 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.000 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.4022 among its measured results: +0.3734.
  • PSI 90 −0.0285
  • CLABSI +0.3734
  • CAUTI −0.1213
  • SSI +0.3620
  • CDI +0.0596
  • MRSA −0.2429

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.1711−0.0285same
CLABSI2.2402+0.3734same
CAUTI−0.7280−0.1213same
SSI2.1717+0.3620same
CDI0.3577+0.0596same
MRSA−1.4573−0.2429same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/020012/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 5 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.0750, higher than 61% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.2500, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.9200, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.3878, higher than 26% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2484, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.3073, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.5748, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2022: score 1.1939, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.6798, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.7648, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.4022, higher than 75% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.0750, higher than 61% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.2500, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.9200, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.3878, higher than 26% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2484, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.3073, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.5748, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2022: score 1.1939, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.6798, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.7648, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.4022, higher than 75% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.075061.5%not cut
FY20165.250045.0%not cut
FY20174.920040.9%not cut
FY2018−0.387826.0%not cut
FY2019−0.248434.1%not cut
FY20200.307373.4%not cut
FY20210.574886.0%cut
FY20221.193997.3%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.679886.0%cut
FY20250.764889.7%cut
FY20260.402275.9%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 3 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CAUTI 1.86 → 0.47 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 1.863CAUTI, 2018: 0.685CAUTI, 2019: 1.489CAUTI, 2021: 2.592CAUTI, 2022: 0.935CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.469 SSI, colon 0.84 → 2.61 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.844SSI, colon, 2018: 1.018SSI, colon, 2019: 1.926SSI, colon, 2021: 1.280SSI, colon, 2022: 1.871SSI, colon, 2023: 2.475SSI, colon, 2024: 2.609 C. diff 0.30 → 0.53 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.296C. diff, 2018: 0.580C. diff, 2019: 0.296C. diff, 2021: 0.230C. diff, 2022: 0.300C. diff, 2023: 0.442C. diff, 2024: 0.526 CAUTI 1.86 → 0.47 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 1.863CAUTI, 2018: 0.685CAUTI, 2019: 1.489CAUTI, 2021: 2.592CAUTI, 2022: 0.935CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.469 SSI, colon 0.84 → 2.61 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.844SSI, colon, 2018: 1.018SSI, colon, 2019: 1.926SSI, colon, 2021: 1.280SSI, colon, 2022: 1.871SSI, colon, 2023: 2.475SSI, colon, 2024: 2.609 C. diff 0.30 → 0.53 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.296C. diff, 2018: 0.580C. diff, 2019: 0.296C. diff, 2021: 0.230C. diff, 2022: 0.300C. diff, 2023: 0.442C. diff, 2024: 0.526

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCAUTISSI, colonC. diff
20171.8630.8440.296
20180.6851.0180.580
20191.4891.9260.296
20212.5921.2800.230
20220.9351.8710.300
20230.0002.4750.442
20240.4692.6090.526

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Alaska, its score is higher than 57% of the other 7 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 50% (Alaska).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Alaska: CMS cut 4 of 8 (50%); middle score 0.2409Alaska 8 hospitals50% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.4022 This hospital 0.4022 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Alaska: CMS cut 4 of 8 (50%); middle score 0.2409Alaska8 hospitals50% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.4022 This hospital 0.4022

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045375%
West region59315726%−0.030274%
Alaska8450%0.240957%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105376%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073278%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013474%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057478%
This hospital0.4022
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 231 miles away.
50 mi100 mi250 mi8. Peacehealth St Joseph Medical Center, Bellingham: score −0.3308, not cut, 1,445 miles87. Bartlett Regional Hospital, Juneau: score 0.0796, not cut, 624 miles76. Yukon Kuskokwim Delta Reg Hospital, Bethel: score −1.4622, not cut, 526 miles65. Central Peninsula General Hospital, Soldotna: score 0.5748, cut, 318 miles54. Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage: score 0.8527, cut, 261 miles43. Providence Alaska Medical Center, Anchorage: score 0.5634, cut, 260 miles32. Alaska Regional Hospital, Anchorage: score −0.0564, not cut, 259 miles21. Mat-Su Regional Medical Center, Palmer: score −0.8863, not cut, 231 miles1This hospital: Fairbanks Memorial Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Mat-Su Regional Medical Center, Palmer, AK231−0.8863not cut
Alaska Regional Hospital, Anchorage, AK259−0.0564not cut
Providence Alaska Medical Center, Anchorage, AK2600.5634cut
Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage, AK2610.8527cut
Central Peninsula General Hospital, Soldotna, AK3180.5748cut
Yukon Kuskokwim Delta Reg Hospital, Bethel, AK526−1.4622not cut
Bartlett Regional Hospital, Juneau, AK6240.0796not cut
Peacehealth St Joseph Medical Center, Bellingham, WA1,445−0.3308not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Mat-Su Regional Medical CenterPalmer, AK231−0.8863No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
2Alaska Regional HospitalAnchorage, AK259−0.0564No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3Providence Alaska Medical CenterAnchorage, AK2600.56341% cut$1.2MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
4Alaska Native Medical CenterAnchorage, AK2610.85271% cut$553KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
5Central Peninsula General HospitalSoldotna, AK3180.57481% cut$287KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
6Yukon Kuskokwim Delta Reg HospitalBethel, AK526−1.4622No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
7Bartlett Regional HospitalJuneau, AK6240.0796No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
8Peacehealth St Joseph Medical CenterBellingham, WA1,445−0.3308No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Fairbanks Memorial Hospital, Fairbanks, AK: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/020012/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.