P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalNortheast Alabama Regional Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$760K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 010078

1Hospital

Northeast Alabama Regional Medical Center

2Location

Anniston, AL (Alabama’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 36207

Calhoun County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 323 beds · Government · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

1 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.6627

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$289K estimate
Likely $220⁠–⁠364K; about $123 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$289K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6627 for Northeast Alabama Regional Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $28.9M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $123 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $220–364K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6627 This hospital 0.6627 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6627 This hospital 0.6627

Higher than 86% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 6 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CDI down to the national median (0.346) would lower the score the most: by 0.3859, to 0.2768. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CDI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 72% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9009

    Z-score−0.6116

    Part of score−0.1019

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 81% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.990

    Z-score0.8901

    Part of score+0.1484

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 89% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.118

    Z-score1.3763

    Part of score+0.2294

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 82% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.280

    Z-score−0.9768

    Part of score−0.1628

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.146

    Z-score2.1931

    Part of score+0.3655

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 85% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.226

    Z-score1.1049

    Part of score+0.1842

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.90090.9623−0.6116−0.1019Better than 72% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.9900.5590.8901+0.1484Worse than 81% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI1.1180.4891.3763+0.2294Worse than 89% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.2800.795−0.9768−0.1628Better than 82% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI1.1460.3462.1931+0.3655Worse than 97% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.2260.6411.1049+0.1842Worse than 85% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.6116PSI 90+0.8901CLABSI+1.3763CAUTI−0.9768SSI+2.1931CDI+1.1049MRSA)÷6measures=0.6627Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2835 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.6627, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.6116 divided by 6 = −0.1019PSI 90−0.1019 CLABSI: z‑score 0.8901 divided by 6 = +0.1484CLABSI+0.1484 CAUTI: z‑score 1.3763 divided by 6 = +0.2294CAUTI+0.2294 SSI: z‑score −0.9768 divided by 6 = −0.1628SSI−0.1628 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 6 = +0.3655CDI+0.3655 MRSA: z‑score 1.1049 divided by 6 = +0.1842MRSA+0.1842 Total HAC Score: 0.6627Score0.6627 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.6116 divided by 6 = −0.1019PSI 90−0.1019 CLABSI: z‑score 0.8901 divided by 6 = +0.1484CLABSI+0.1484 CAUTI: z‑score 1.3763 divided by 6 = +0.2294CAUTI+0.2294 SSI: z‑score −0.9768 divided by 6 = −0.1628SSI−0.1628 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 6 = +0.3655CDI+0.3655 MRSA: z‑score 1.1049 divided by 6 = +0.1842MRSA+0.1842 Total HAC Score: 0.6627Score0.6627 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.6116−0.1019−0.1019
CLABSI0.8901+0.14840.0465
CAUTI1.3763+0.22940.2759
SSI−0.9768−0.16280.1131
CDI2.1931+0.36550.4786
MRSA1.1049+0.18420.6628
Total HAC Score0.6627
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2835 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $289K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $289K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $289K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6627 This hospital 0.6627 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $289K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $289Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6627 This hospital 0.6627

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$289,374
This hospital0.6627−$289,374
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$289,374

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($29,408,324payment−$326,468readmissions−$144,457value-based)×1%the cut=$289,374HAC cut

$289,374HAC cut÷2,353traditional Medicare stays=$123per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $289K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$326K and −$144K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $23,486,933
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $936,189
Outliers: unusually costly stays $236,513
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,925,684
Uncompensated care $2,823,005
Total, before the three programs $29,408,324
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9861 − 1) −$326,468
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9938 − 1) −$144,457
After these two $28,937,399
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $220⁠–⁠364K −$289,374
Net of the three programs likely −$894K to −$612K −$760,299

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$23,486,933
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$936,189
Outliers: unusually costly stays$236,513
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,925,684
Uncompensated care$2,823,005
Total, before the three programs$29,408,324
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9861 − 1))−$326,468
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9938 − 1))−$144,457
After these two$28,937,399
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $220–364K)−$289,374
Net of the three programs (likely −$894K to −$612K)−$760,299

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.6627same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$289Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6627 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $289K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSI0.256 or lower
CAUTI0.412 or lower
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDI0.504 or lower
MRSA0.412 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9009 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.990 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 1.118 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.280 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 1.146 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.226 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CDI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.6627 among its measured results: +0.3655.
  • PSI 90 −0.1019
  • CLABSI +0.1484
  • CAUTI +0.2294
  • SSI −0.1628
  • CDI +0.3655
  • MRSA +0.1842

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.6116−0.1019same
CLABSI0.8901+0.1484same
CAUTI1.3763+0.2294same
SSI−0.9768−0.1628same
CDI2.1931+0.3655same
MRSA1.1049+0.1842same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 6 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.4000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.7500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.7500, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.2132, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.1579, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.3937, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.5603, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.9305, higher than 94% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.2636, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.8913, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6627, higher than 86% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.4000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.7500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.7500, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.2132, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.1579, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.3937, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.5603, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.9305, higher than 94% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.2636, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.8913, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6627, higher than 86% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.400083.3%cut
FY20166.750072.4%not cut
FY20175.750057.3%not cut
FY20180.213267.2%not cut
FY20190.157964.2%not cut
FY20200.393778.3%cut
FY20210.560385.3%cut
FY20220.930594.1%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.263669.4%not cut
FY20250.891392.4%cut
FY20260.662786.2%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 2.34 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.343CLABSI, 2018: 3.774CLABSI, 2019: 1.647CLABSI, 2021: 0.328CLABSI, 2022: 0.288CLABSI, 2023: 1.850CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 0.18 → 0.54 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.179CAUTI, 2018: 0.198CAUTI, 2019: 1.293CAUTI, 2021: 1.112CAUTI, 2022: 0.205CAUTI, 2023: 1.622CAUTI, 2024: 0.535 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.890SSI, colon, 2021: 0.260SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.618SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 2.52 → 0.57 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 2.515MRSA, 2018: 1.419MRSA, 2019: 1.585MRSA, 2021: 1.081MRSA, 2022: 1.366MRSA, 2023: 1.976MRSA, 2024: 0.573 C. diff 0.29 → 1.18 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.293C. diff, 2018: 0.631C. diff, 2019: 0.756C. diff, 2021: 1.104C. diff, 2022: 1.156C. diff, 2023: 1.117C. diff, 2024: 1.177 CLABSI 2.34 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.343CLABSI, 2018: 3.774CLABSI, 2019: 1.647CLABSI, 2021: 0.328CLABSI, 2022: 0.288CLABSI, 2023: 1.850CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 0.18 → 0.54 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.179CAUTI, 2018: 0.198CAUTI, 2019: 1.293CAUTI, 2021: 1.112CAUTI, 2022: 0.205CAUTI, 2023: 1.622CAUTI, 2024: 0.535 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.890SSI, colon, 2021: 0.260SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.618SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 2.52 → 0.57 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 2.515MRSA, 2018: 1.419MRSA, 2019: 1.585MRSA, 2021: 1.081MRSA, 2022: 1.366MRSA, 2023: 1.976MRSA, 2024: 0.573 C. diff 0.29 → 1.18 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.293C. diff, 2018: 0.631C. diff, 2019: 0.756C. diff, 2021: 1.104C. diff, 2022: 1.156C. diff, 2023: 1.117C. diff, 2024: 1.177

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20172.3430.1790.0002.5150.293
20183.7740.1980.0001.4190.631
20191.6471.2930.8901.5850.756
20210.3281.1120.2601.0811.104
20220.2880.2050.0001.3661.156
20231.8501.6220.6181.9761.117
20240.0000.5350.0000.5731.177

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Alabama, its score is higher than 73% of the other 67 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 22% (300 to 499 beds) to 43% (Alabama).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Alabama: CMS cut 29 of 68 (43%); middle score 0.2561Alabama 68 hospitals43% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government 401 hospitals35% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.6627 This hospital 0.6627 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Alabama: CMS cut 29 of 68 (43%); middle score 0.2561Alabama68 hospitals43% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government401 hospitals35% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.6627 This hospital 0.6627

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045386%
South region1,17426322%−0.105686%
Alabama682943%0.256173%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105384%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038490%
Government40114035%0.160277%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057488%
This hospital0.6627
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 5 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 22 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Marshall Medical Centers, Boaz: score 0.6065, cut, 43 miles87. Coosa Valley Medical Center, Sylacauga: score −0.8311, not cut, 42 miles76. Floyd Cherokee Medical Center, Centre: score −1.4622, not cut, 36 miles65. Clay County Hospital, Ashland: score 1.0698, cut, 30 miles54. St Vincent's St Clair, Pell City: score 0.9644, cut, 28 miles43. Riverview Regional Medical Center, Gadsden: score −0.5664, not cut, 26 miles32. Gadsden Regional Medical Center, Gadsden: score 0.6323, cut, 26 miles21. Citizens Baptist Medical Center, Talladega: score 1.4707, cut, 22 miles1This hospital: Northeast Alabama Regional Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Citizens Baptist Medical Center, Talladega, AL221.4707cut
Gadsden Regional Medical Center, Gadsden, AL260.6323cut
Riverview Regional Medical Center, Gadsden, AL26−0.5664not cut
St Vincent's St Clair, Pell City, AL280.9644cut
Clay County Hospital, Ashland, AL301.0698cut
Floyd Cherokee Medical Center, Centre, AL36−1.4622not cut
Coosa Valley Medical Center, Sylacauga, AL42−0.8311not cut
Marshall Medical Centers, Boaz, AL430.6065cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Citizens Baptist Medical CenterTalladega, AL221.47071% cut$39KAbove the national median on 3 of 3 measures
2Gadsden Regional Medical CenterGadsden, AL260.63231% cut$219KAbove the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Riverview Regional Medical CenterGadsden, AL26−0.5664No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
4St Vincent's St ClairPell City, AL280.96441% cut$44KAbove the national median on 2 of 3 measures
5Clay County HospitalAshland, AL301.06981% cut$17KAbove the national median on 2 of 2 measures
6Floyd Cherokee Medical CenterCentre, AL36−1.4622No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
7Coosa Valley Medical CenterSylacauga, AL42−0.8311No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
8Marshall Medical CentersBoaz, AL430.60651% cut$148KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Northeast Alabama Regional Medical Center, Anniston, AL: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/010078/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.