P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalGreene County Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: $0×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 010051

1Hospital

Greene County Hospital

2Location

Eutaw, AL (Alabama’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 35462

Greene County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 20 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

Not Available

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
CMS footnote 16: There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

No score published

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $4K, likely $3⁠–⁠5K estimate

No score

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports no Total HAC Score for Greene County Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $4K estimate 1% of about $398K, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year.

Likely range $3–5K

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

In FY2024, FY2025, and FY2026, CMS reports a payment reduction decision for this hospital but no Total HAC Score.

CMS’s note on the score: Results are not available for this reporting period.

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 0 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Figure 1. CMS published no measure values for this hospital.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 12: This measure does not apply to this hospital for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 90no value published0.9623no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTIno value published0.489no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDIno value published0.346no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($398,494payment+$0readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$3,985at stake

$3,985at stake÷27traditional Medicare stays=$148per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 2. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $4K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $176,436
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $5,293
Low-volume adjustment $79,699
Capital: buildings and equipment $13,656
Uncompensated care $123,410
Total, before the three programs $398,494
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) not in CMS’s readmissions file: no adjustment $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $398,494
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $3,985 $0
Net of the three programs $0

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, outlier payments, and a sole community hospital rate difference.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$176,436
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$5,293
Low-volume adjustment$79,699
Capital: buildings and equipment$13,656
Uncompensated care$123,410
Total, before the three programs$398,494
Readmissions (HRRP) (not in CMS’s readmissions file: no adjustment)$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$398,494
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $3,985)$0
Net of the three programs$0

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 3. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.0000, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.0000, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0130, higher than 50% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.0466, higher than 55% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.0638, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.0868, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.0983, higher than 62% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.0000, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.0000, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0130, higher than 50% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.0466, higher than 55% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.0638, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.0868, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.0983, higher than 62% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.000073.6%not cut
FY20166.000056.2%not cut
FY20176.000062.8%not cut
FY2018−0.013050.3%not cut
FY20190.046655.6%not cut
FY20200.063857.4%not cut
FY20210.086859.8%not cut
FY20220.098362.4%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024N/Anot cut, with no score published
FY2025N/Anot cut, with no score published
FY2026N/Anot cut, with no score published

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

5
Results are not available for this reporting period.
13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
12
This measure does not apply to this hospital for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Greene County Hospital, Eutaw, AL: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/010051/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.